Anyone who writes daily for a living is going to occasionally have periods when writing doesn’t come easily. Every once in a while, you won’t feel like writing. Maybe you just want to veg out or do something normal. Maybe you can’t find anything truly inspiring to discuss. Maybe your creative juices get depleted and need to be recharged.
I have a different problem. I want to write and have plenty to write about. I just don’t want to say what I feel I have to say.
Call it a heavy heart or something too close to despondency. Call it an uneasiness with stating plainly what is growing painfully obvious. I’m naturally inclined toward calm and suspicious of hyperbole. If I find my political heat boiling too quickly, I tend not to trust myself and to doubt the value or utility of what I have to say.
I have to toss those reservations aside to make commentary on the state of our nation. This is a five-alarm fire, and anything I might say about it can hardly match what even some Republicans are already saying. For example, Eliot Cohen has taken a tone that is so dire and vituperative that it would be very difficult for a liberal like myself to surpass.
Precisely because the problem is one of temperament and character, it will not get better. It will get worse, as power intoxicates Trump and those around him. It will probably end in calamity—substantial domestic protest and violence, a breakdown of international economic relationships, the collapse of major alliances, or perhaps one or more new wars (even with China) on top of the ones we already have. It will not be surprising in the slightest if his term ends not in four or in eight years, but sooner, with impeachment or removal under the 25th Amendment. The sooner Americans get used to these likelihoods, the better.
Cohen served as Condoleezza Rice’s counselor at the State Department from 2007 to 2009. He’s a neoconservative hawk whose career has been tightly linked with Paul Wolfowitz. In 1997, he cofounded the notorious Project for the New American Century (PNAC), an organization that pushed relentlessly for war with Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. He served as a puppet of Dick Cheney’s propaganda war, arguing on television for Cheney’s pet theories that 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta met with an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague and that Hussein had other ties to the 9/11 attacks. He opposed the nomination of Chuck Hagel to serve as Secretary of Defense under President Obama because he thought he wouldn’t be tough enough on Iran.
Over the years, I have thought of Cohen as a kind of poster boy for the banality of evil, as he played with others’ lives in a cavalier way, always advocating more and more violence without ever considering the possibility of his own hubris or weighing sufficiently the downside risks of the policies he advocated. Were he to make a foreign policy recommendation, I would greet it with immense skepticism. But he’s making an assessment of our new president’s character, and he’s doing it from a position where he has access to insights that I don’t enjoy.
Cohen was a vocal part of the conservative #NeverTrump team during the primaries and even the general election. Despite that, he was quickly tapped after Trump’s victory to give staffing advice for the incoming administration’s national security team. In a November 15th column, he explained why he had to back out of that arrangement.
The short version is that Cohen, who had initially “urged career officials to serve in Trump’s administration,” was contacted by “a longtime friend and senior transition team official (who) asked him to submit names of possible national security appointees.” In one case, he mentioned a name of someone who was wary of serving under Trump and therefore “would not submit a résumé but would listen if contacted.” In response, Cohen’s friend sent a “very weird, very disturbing” email:
“It was accusations that ‘you guys are trying to insinuate yourselves into the administration…all of YOU LOST.’…it became clear to me that they view jobs as lollipops, things you give out to good boys and girls,” said Cohen, who would not identify his friend…His friend’s email conveyed the feeling that ‘we’re so glad to see the bicoastal elites get theirs,’” added Cohen, who described the response as “unhinged.”
At that point Cohen switched gears and advised no one who valued their reputation and integrity to serve Trump at least until they saw “who gets the top jobs.”
Until then, let the Trump team fill the deputy assistant secretary and assistant secretary jobs with civil servants, retired military officers and diplomats, or the large supply of loyal or obsequious second-raters who will be eager to serve. The administration may shake itself out in a year or two and reach out to others who have been worried about Trump. Or maybe not.
Since Trump’s inauguration, Cohen has taken a harder line, culminating with the piece he wrote yesterday. Here’s his assessment of where we’re headed in a hand basket (including the part already cited above).
Trump, in one spectacular week, has already shown himself one of the worst of our presidents, who has no regard for the truth (indeed a contempt for it), whose patriotism is a belligerent nationalism, whose prior public service lay in avoiding both the draft and taxes, who does not know the Constitution, does not read and therefore does not understand our history, and who, at his moment of greatest success, obsesses about approval ratings, how many people listened to him on the Mall, and enemies…
…Precisely because the problem is one of temperament and character, it will not get better. It will get worse, as power intoxicates Trump and those around him. It will probably end in calamity—substantial domestic protest and violence, a breakdown of international economic relationships, the collapse of major alliances, or perhaps one or more new wars (even with China) on top of the ones we already have. It will not be surprising in the slightest if his term ends not in four or in eight years, but sooner, with impeachment or removal under the 25th Amendment. The sooner Americans get used to these likelihoods, the better.
Of course, I ended last week with a similar set of conclusions, including an invocation of the 25th Amendment as the only way out of this disaster. And that was before Trump unveiled his Muslim Ban and spurred nationwide domestic protest and international condemnation.
I don’t want to adopt this shrill and alarmist tone, but I hope at least it can be recognized as something different from partisan dissatisfaction with the results of an election I thought and hoped would go in the other direction. Cohen and I couldn’t be more different in our personal politics or our foreign policy priorities, and yet we’re singing from the exact same hymnal on Trump. Keep in mind, the likely remedy for this situation would make Mike Pence our president which means that most of the consequences of losing the election that I don’t like wouldn’t be mitigated and, in many cases, might even be exacerbated. I’m not looking to escape the natural consequences of an election, as much as I might wish things had turned out differently in November. I honestly do not think this country can endure a four-year term of Trump as our president, and the prospects for worldwide calamity are so great that I can’t avoid saying very radical sounding things about where we stand and what must be done.
This morning Ileana Ros Lehtinen was on CNN, vs the ban – she brought up separation of powers.
Booman, you wrote a very helpful post about the Mormons re: this issue. that is what we need, reasoned posts about how to move forward, making alliances across the aisle.
That is what we need, reasoned posts about how to move forward, making alliances across the aisle.
I’m warning you. Be very careful about that!! People like Evan McMullin, or Eliot Cohen, aren’t your friend, no matter how much other people are fooled/suckered into believing otherwise.
Alliances don’t have to be with friends. We allied with the Soviet Union in WWII, and it’s a good thing we did.
But they do have to have to share an objective that is necessary for both and less costly than other alternatives for the parties. McMullin and Cohen don’t meet that test.
we’re not saying jump on board to their entire agenda but where we agree join forces
McMullin is against the Muslim ban so we can ally on that. For the most part, the next two years are going to be about stopping Trump initiatives and for the most part we will be able to agree with “sane” Republicans on that. That won’t obligate us to support some odious proposal of theirs in 2021.
Also, the way American politics works, stopping Trump successfully will likely put the Democrats in power in 2021. Republicans know this and NeverTrump Republicans are basically those willing to accept another round of Democratic dominance to stop Trump. They, not we, are the ones who will pay most of the cost of any alliance. I think they deserve some slack for being willing to put country before party, for once.
You know that McMullin tweeted out a picture of himself Friday at the “March for Life,” right? All the rabid anti-choice fanatics go to that. McMullin is trying to play the “last reasonable Republican” grift.
A lot of those Trump voters many say we need to win back happen to like his views on immigration, law and order, regulations, etc.
Warnings are fine. Everyone should have their eyes wide open. But this isn’t, shouldn’t be, and can’t be a partisan issue. Allowing it to be partisan gives Trump strength, and he has more than enough of that as it is.
But this isn’t, shouldn’t be, and can’t be a partisan issue.
It already is though. What elected Republican do you see standing up to Trump? There isn’t one. Has any elected Republican come out against the Muslim ban, for starters?
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/01/republicans-are-not-all-board-trumps-immigration-order
Charlie baker, governor of Massachusetts, has come out strongly against it.
Because of the protests the other day and because the businesses, especially hospitals/medical centers, in Boston would blast him with both barrels.
And? That’s how politics works. You can be a Republican in MA but you can’t be a wingnut, because the people won’t stand for it.
>>People like Evan McMullin, or Eliot Cohen, aren’t your friend
the system needs a +10 rating for this.
what they wrote. it’s not about friends. it’s about showing the world how it’s done, without violence.
Step 1, alliances across the aisle
I assume we are moving towards 25th amendment. that will involve lots and lots of discussion in the media and Congress and probably SCOTUS – I have no idea. This will involve everyone. keep in mind, if we don’t, other parties, well aware of the direness of the situation, may step in and that will not be good in the long term (as we may assume, they well know).
Get off the couch in your parents basement, guys, let’s get to work.
Indeed, a nation turns its lonely eyes to you, Victoria Nuland…
No one gives a shit about Victoria Nuland outside of Washington hacks and a small number of far left and far right foreign policy critics.
I’m warning you. Be very careful about that!! People like Evan McMullin, or Eliot Cohen, aren’t your friend, no matter how much other people are fooled/suckered into believing otherwise.
Exactly. It’s standard Republican Detachment Disorder weasel-speak. These guys’ fee-fees are hurt because they don’t actually disagree with anything the GOP has to say, just that their president says it so baldly. They’re like “I never had anything whatsoever to do with this madness during my career as a GOP functionary or water carrier. And I’ve never heard of this Limbaugh guy either!” They try to liken the Trump Phenomenon just suddenly appearing one day like a mushroom cloud over the offices of the RNC. Don’t give Cohen one iota of credit here. He had no problem passively letting the likes of Brooks, Will, Malkin, O’Reilly, Beck, Hannity and the rest work long and hard on weaponizing the stupid and when it’s blown up in his face, well…Republican Detachment Disorder.
If President Pence had this exact same order vetted and had proper procedures in place for its implementation so that there wouldn’t be the operational clusterfuck at the ground level, ie., the airports, none of the Cohens on the right would be bleating.
Is anyone aware of a literature (political philosophy?) that discusses, sort of academically, the point at which it becomes incumbent upon the citizens of a democracy to physically resist, nonviolently or otherwise, the duly-elected regime?
I’m inclined not toward calm so much but toward a life of insular privilege. Still, this is something that I’ve never given a great deal of thought to. I presume other people have. Any recommendations?
The right wing crazies have been talking about “taking up arms” against the government for years–especially during Obama’s presidency. (“Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice” and all that.) They’ve normalized that dialogue completely–except when they say it, it’s about gun control, corporate regulation and white power.
Yeah, but surely there’s a more measured, intelligent literature about this question. I’m not saying I’m about to run out and stand in front of a tank. I posses a powerful combination of cowardice and prejudice. I just suspect there’s a book about this shit that starts with “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice” and actually breaks things down.
I mean, the vast majority of the left agrees that invading Iraq under false pretenses and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people wasn’t sufficient, right? Was it incumbent upon Americans to use force against the Roosevelt administration because of Japanese internment?
I think most of us would say no. So what are the triggers? What are the factors? I don’t know. What are the questions to ask?
Prejudice! I meant ‘privilege,’ but prejudice is no doubt true, too!
I highly recommend you just shut up about this. go demonstrate at an airport if you’re wondering what to do
this is not the way to go, absolutely not. peaceful demonstrations, lawsuits [all in process].
We should ‘absolutely not’ ask for recommendations of academic literature? The question is a legitimate one. I’m not saying we’ve reached that point; I’m asking if there are people who’ve thought this through more thoroughly than you or I have.
I don’t know if Trump will collapse under the weight of his monstrosity and inadequacy. I suspect so. If he doesn’t, I don’t know if he’ll rise to the level of a genocidal threat. I hope not. However, I am fairly certain that this is the time to gain clarity on these matters, while they are still just outlandish questions in blog comments.
etc.
What especially scares me about this situation is the elephant in the room (meaning it, not “literally” but somewhat less figuratively than the way that saying is usually employed): the Trump voters. They put him in the Oval Office, fair and square (unlike Bush II, either time), and they think all of this is great. “He’s already done more in eight days than Obama did in eight years”…”exhilharating”…”finally someone on our side” etc.
And, the method I’m seeing everywhere on the left for combating or persuading those people — talking about Trump’s contempt for women or for people of color — is not working (and never will work). They don’t want to hear from “politically correct” “liberal crybabies” (we’re exactly the problem Trump is “solving”). Mentioning women or women’s rights is about as effective in this context as it was for Marcia Clark when she erroneously believed that the black women on the O. J. jury would sympathize with his murdered wife (they detested her). “Why do you hate me?” is not an effective argument against Trump supporters.
The only thing that is going to have any effect on those people is, unfortunately, when the Bannon approach to geopolitics, domestic economics and industry/trade (meaning, regulation, taxation etc.) fail spectacularly — and, even in that case, I’m not sure they’ll get the point (they’ll probably blame someone else). These people have been very carefully conditioned over many decades to believe in a coherent system of nonsense and misinformation; getting them to awaken to reality is as difficult as de-programming Scientologists. Right now, they’re in a heady, glorious honeymoon period. They don’t see anything wrong at all–this is exactly what they voted for.
We’re not going to reach Trump’s base. They’re filthy pieces of shit and they always will be. But not everyone who voted for Trump is a part of his base. His approval rating is in free-fall. We can drive down his support to just his base. Which is what, about 27% of the population? Maybe less? And then, hopefully, put the fear into the congressional majorities that enable him. We don’t have to peel off too many senators to handicap the right’s legislative agenda, and Trump’s litany of evil fuckups are going to be a big help with that.
You’re not wrong but a number of Trump voters disapproved of him but voted for him anyway.
Sure, and those are exactly the people that we can get on our side now that crooked Hillary isn’t there to vote against.
On a related note:
Trump Regrets
The biggest difference between me and them is that they are surprised. If they had seen this coming like all of us did they wouldn’t have voted for him either. Strange.
areyousorryyet
Nothing that I have seen from alt-lefties like you will attract a single Trump voter. It’s “racist”, “stupid”, “nazi”, and other insanely stupid shit like that all the way.
People do not like to be badgered. The alt-left has decided that full-throated hysteria is the best approach. This is both wrong and deeply deeply stupid. What SHOULD be done right now is to SIT THE FUCK DOWN and SHUT THE FUCK UP.
When your enemy sinking, the best choice is sit there and let him drown.
Let his supporters, especially the tepid ones, watch him for a time. They will many of them come around. But if the alt-left losers push them into a corner, tepid supporters will be converted into much stronger supporters.
By the full hysteria of the alt-left right now, the Trump supporters are being strengthened and pushed farther into a Trump-support mode.
Words fail me. Words fail me. I will let President Bannon speak, instead:
http://www.vox.com/2017/1/29/14429984/trump-immigration-order-steve-bannon
This is 100% unadulterated racism and white supremacy.
Dataguy is down with Bannon’s vision on this. He’s made it very clear: “Americans” only. And by Americans, we know he means “white” despite his protests to the contrary. Bannon will upend the visa system and keep people out. Dataguy will snitch at first chance if Trump pushes any kind of hotline.
Oh, and WTF is “alt-left”? I’m not alt-left. I’ve voted Democratic in every election since I -could- vote. Many, many of us voted for Hillary. As it turns out, more than voted for President Bannon.
dataguy, are you OK? This doesn’t seem warranted. None of us are talking to vile Trump voters, and they certainly don’t come over here to be “badgered”.
“Alt-left?” Good Lord, I’m seeing extraordinarily mild-mannered people at the post-inauguration protests I’ve gone to. People who have never come out to protests before. People with their young children. I think you’re just off the beam here.
Trump’s Executive Order is transparently racist. It explicitly articulates a religious test. Reports of its execution this weekend included Federal airport security officials asking people in custody what their opinion is of President Trump.
Given all these things, I wonder why your heated concern is about honest citizen response to these horrible, American-hating policies.
He has a sort of point in that the campaign explicitly focused on Trump as racist/sexist and it didn’t work. So why should it work now? Trump has run things as he said he would. None of it was hidden.
That’s different when it comes to Trump voters who didn’t believe that part who thought it was just to whip up others, but no one likes to think they voted for that kind of thing especially when it comes from outside their own heads. Even though it’s not warranted, it’s strategic to make a distinction between Trump being racist and his voters being racist.
Focusing on the orders of the actual impact (i.e. is this the free country you believe in) might be more successful and let them come to the conclusion of fascism/racism on their own.
What does that guy who advocated a bounty system to pay off immigrant-hunting vigilantes think?
Said nobody ever. Have fun in the 27%.
As someone who is somewhat closer to being alt-left, believe me Marduk is not alt-left.
Also letting the enemy sink was what the HRC campaign did the entire time. Didn’t work and doesn’t work. Without actually bringing attention to the sinking without tossing anvils it’s less likely to happen.
I’ve seen two competing definitions for the “alt-left”.
One, promoted by Brietbart and WND during the campaign, is basically just a strident Hillary supporter or “Social Justice Warrior”. It’s just a wingnut slur for Democrat. I assume this is dataguy’s intended usage.
The other, used on progressive blogs, refers to the racist and sexist elements of the left. Basically people like dataguy himself.
I don’t imagine you identify with either definition, so what did you think he meant by it? What’s your understanding of the term “alt-left”?
My understanding was to see it as an the Intercept or Glenn Greenwald type, that see American power as the principle cause of problems in the world (imperialism, corporatism, deep state etc.) and tend be sympathetic to anything that reigns it in. Which I am not, but I am much closer to that than you I think.
Says so right there in the Crazification Factor, aka “the Keyes Constant”.
Well, yeah, it wasn’t an accident I chose that number.
since it could have been just serendipity, figured I might as well just make the ref. explicit for general edification.
Shakespeare wrote:
“Present fears are less than horrible imaginings”
I think much of what had been written here over the last week is over the top apocalyptic nonsense familiar to any regular reader of Zero Hedge.
My own present fears are pretty bad: Obamacare, a New Supreme Court Member, complex negotiations with foreign countries conducted by not very smart and not very experienced people.
But it has two other dimensions are well:
For the Obama to Trump voter (as opposed to the Trump voter) would re-write the sentence as follows:
“Present Fears are GREATER than horrible imaginings”. The voters who decided this election had doubts about Trump but the voted for him anyway. People like Booman STILL haven’t figured out what this means. They retreat into accusations of racism or find other grounds to dismiss what they did not understand.
It is I think, why they are so scared. Since they did not predict Trump, they do not understand what limits might exist.
For a certain type of establishment member (I mean this in the broadest sense) the fear results from their own loss of control It isn’t the change that has been proposed that scares them, it is the unfamiliarity that comes from exile.
For those familiar with Yes Prime Minister, Trump is not one of us.
Yes I think he is a nut job, but no, I don’t think this is anything close to an existential moment for Democracy.
Then, respectfully, you’re not paying sufficient attention to the systemic changes being made right in front of us. By proceeding with Executive Orders that haven’t been vetted by the Justice Department (Trump doesn’t have a John Woo), by exclusing the head of the Joint Chiefs from the National Security Council by fiat (while including Bannon, who hasn’t been vetted), by (reportedly) encouraging NSA agents to disregard Federal court orders — by doing all of this and apparently just defying the congress to do anything about it — Trump is engaged in an Executive seizure of power that puts Bush/Cheney’s to shame. It’s the “enabling” act stage, and it’s happening just as fast as it did in 1933-4.
On twitter people were suggesting that Bannon sitting on the NSC was a violation of law.
Which it absolutely is not. Obama had people on the NSC that were not approved by the Senate as well.
I think you are misreading the moment pretty badly.
Right back at you.
“Trial Balloon for a Coup”
http://medium.com/@yonatanzunger/trial-balloon-for-a-coup-e024990891d5#.8kt08ey7m
Candidly, during the campaign, I thought you were too alarmist.
I don’t feel that way now.
Thank you for that.
This article was written in response to that and is mildly reassuring:
https:/tompepinsky.com/2017/01/30/weak-and-incompetent-leaders-act-like-strong-leaders
Guardian reporting that State Department resignations were actually closer to a purge
OK, so what?
And I bet that the push, in the State Department, to accelerate the movement of refugees in the last few days had more than a little to do with this. Everyone above a certain level was told to submit a pro-forma resignation letter. These letters were accepted.
Dude, I get it: you hate immigrants to the point that your team up with fascists to get rid of them. But a purge is not the same thing that normally happens. Even if they accept resignation letters they keep people on until their people are confirmed. That’s not happening. Nikki Haley requested Obama people stay on until she gets a full staff up and running. Trump said no. That’s insane. They’re not consulting State on anything.
“…to accelerate the movement of refugees in the last few days…”
Assumes facts not in evidence. Not everyone employed by the Federal Government is an Obama mole, contrary to what Dear Leader thinks.
We went through this at the end of Dubya’s last term, fears of sleeper moles within the bureaucracy were unfounded.
not in evidence”, what’s left to them?
As someone who has been much more alarmist vis-a-vis the new fuhrer and his accomplices Rinse Prater, McConnell and Ryan, welcome to the life raft.
No need to any further underline the character and nature of the man that the incompetent white electorate (and the failed constitution) have placed in the WH. It was quite clear he did not have the proper temperament to be prez and is suffering from a spectacularly acute form of personality disorder. That he exponentially increased the danger by surrounding himself with human turds like Bannon simply adds nuclear bombs to the fire.
The difficulty is that as a result of a decade of game rigging, bribery and corruption, the only possible check on the American Madman is the Repub Congress. The Repub party became a destroyed institution during the Stolen Election of 2000, and has incredibly only gotten worse since then. All routes to protect the nation from an insane prez lead through the Congress, and it has been rendered only slightly less insane than the mad prez it now is supposed to oversee. So there is simply no hope on what could be called the “constitutional” front.
That leaves civic disorder, which is also highly problematic given that the vast spaces across the South, Midwest and West are essentially the heartland of Trumpism. The protest are/would be centered on the great blue cities, and there seems no way to get at the true geography and backbone of Trumpism. Add in the fact that they are heavily armed, irrational and simply awaiting the American Madman’s tweet ordering all patriots to attack the enemy.
As for the courts, as Gruppehfuhrer Bannon’s hero Andrew Jackson once said, “John Marshall [the Great Chief Justice] has made his decision, now let him enforce it”. Judicial orders aren’t self-executing, unfortunately.
Quite a conundrum. But if it is any kind of philosophical consolation, we have reached the logical endpoint of the vile American “Conservative” movement, and history will record that those that call themselves “conservatives” are to blame for all that now comes about…although as usual they will wildly deny it, Cohen included.
CNBC Now
Does anyone on his team understand how regulations come into existence and how they can be revoked? Exactly who is this EC directed at? Congress? The agencies under his authority?
Now I could go for an EC to the Pentagon that for every new dollar requested in it budget proposal, two dollars must be cut from the existing Pentagon budget.
Satire account?
Nope. (I checked other sources before posting the CNBC News tweet.) Reuters – Trump signs executive order to slash regulations.
Holy fuck.
Trumpian reality has already left satire in the dust.
I can’t trust my own grasp of reality. It’s like second-level gaslighting.
The Onion should just start printing the news.
Broadening my question to: does anyone on his team know and understand anything about government operations and the law?
The answer to that question according to The NYTimes is no and his team is limited to his inner circle. How Trump’s Rush to Enact an Immigration Ban Unleashed Global Chaos.
WTF? Is Trumper already scraping the bottom of the barrel for Hundred Days newz?
What a stupid person thinks smart policy sounds like. Or perhaps this was an official MAGA contest?–“Submit YOUR good gub’mint suggestion to Preslident Trump and win a free MAGA beer mug!”
From the Know-it-all at Zeb’s Bar to national policy. Waaahoooo!! Heil Trumper!
Probably worse than What a stupid person thinks smart policy sounds like.
Note the difference in the operating style of GWB and Trump. Both ignorant and relatively average in intelligence. Both born into privilege. I’m seeing Trump as the exceedingly overvalued child (a relatively rare phenomenon) and that wasn’t the case with GWB. Thus, GWB was reckless but he wasn’t without doubts. While he blew off his recklessness, ignorance, and doubts, it fell far short of Trump’s “So, what!” GWB also had Poppy and his BFFs around who would say, “Uhh …” Trump has yet to exhibit any doubt that he’s not a genius and master of all.
Cohen wrote:
Oh.
That sounds just like Bush II to me…Bush II as played by the puppeteer Dick Cheney. Cohen is just playing both sides against the middle in order to get over.
Do not take all of these vicious neocon lashings out at Trump as anything other than an attempt to climb back in the driver’s seat and continue to make Blood For Oil war monies. Trump is simply allied with another gang of thieves, and they have now successfully taken much of the NeoCon Gang’s territories.
You are absolutely correct in saying that Cohen is:
Why would you begin to trust his stated opinions now? He’s not just Trump’s enemy, he is everbody’s enemy except for those his own gang. Ally with him at your peril.
At all of our peril.
Bet on it.
AG
P.S. There are better ways to oppose rump than okey-doking the Cheney forces.
There must be, or we are all royally fucked.
Bet on that as well.
Trump, or his handlers, is playing the Andrew Jackson card. He will defy Fed courts and the Supreme Court if it comes to that. To slow that process, Fed Judges need to issue bench warrants for contempt on the Customs and Immigration officials and have Federal Marshals start picking them up.
The President may be covered by Executive Privilege but I doubt an official at JFK is. And arrest anyone who tries to spring them.
By forcing Federal employees to make a choice, is the one way to stop the slide.
Ridge
Here’s the earworm I’ve been hearing for the last several days:
…
And I don’t know a soul who’s not been battered
I don’t have a friend who feels at ease
I don’t know a dream that’s not been shattered
or driven to its knees
But it’s all right, it’s all right
We’ve lived so well so long
Still, when I think of the road
we’re traveling on
I wonder what went wrong
I can’t help it, I wonder what went wrong
My earworm… Toad the Wet Sprocket — Amnesia
The final solution’s back in style
We are the ones letting it ride
I never knew we were so blind
Amnesia in comfort, so unkind
Tell me
When they come for you
Who will there be to speak
And when they come for you
Who will there be left to speak for you?