Still Calling

Democratic Party

Not this time, motherfucker

The Orange Shitstain stepped in it last week. While Fuckstick von Clownface and his team of neo-Nazis probably expected the “coastal liberal elites” to protest their idiotic and hateful ban on Muslims, they instead caused a nationwide backlash. Here’s a sampling. And remember: we are not alone. There are more of us then there are…

Hillary Derangement Syndrome

I couldn’t get through this recent piece of shit at Common Dreams without throwing things at the wall. I couldn’t even finish it.

“Pro-Clinton Democrats join Big Pharma and state Republicans in fighting to defeat first-in-the-nation ballot measure for statewide single-payer plan”

Colorado was not first in the nation to propose a single-payer system. That was Vermont in 2011. And before that there as MAsscare and other experiments. Oh sure, play semantics SORRY YOU’RE WRONG.

“Most Americans support replacing Obamacare with a single-payer system, and Bernie Sanders has made his support for universal healthcare a central pillar of his presidential campaign. His rival Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, continues to support the least popular position of maintaining the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with only incremental and modest changes.”

Like many people, I support single payer. I have more skin in the game than most because I am on Medicaid now -essentially single-payer health care- due to my long-term unemployment. It is superior in every way to my previous Obamacare Silver plan. THAT SAID. I was an actual sort-of serious reporter during the healthcare debates and was deep in the weeds of the research. It is, frankly, unbelievable that anything passed at all and now that the ACA is here, it’s not going away anymore than the TSA or the NSA. The Sanders idea of starting over just isn’t realistic. What IS realistic, and which WAS popular about Obamacare, is the Public Option. The insurance companies opposed it tooth and nail, because it’s basically “Medicare for All”. Obama backed down. But Clinton is on the record as saying she wants to revisit the public option, which she has vocally supported since day one.
It is interesting that the writer keeps using phrasing like “Pro-Clinton Democrats join Big Pharma and state Republicans” and “Clinton’s position is echoed by establishment Democrats in Colorado, including Clinton supporter and former governor Bill Ritter” and “John Hickenlooper, the state’s current governor another prominent pro-Clinton Democrat”. Clinton, to the best of my knowledge, has never represented Colorado in any form: she was first lady in Arkansas, First Lady in the White House, Senator for New York, and Secretary of State. There is no reason at all to believe that the preferences of Colorado Reps Ritter and Hickenlooper have anything to do with Clinton’s preferences: in fact it’s absurd. By the writer’s logic, Clinton must also be in favor of legal marijuana, since both of these Clinton-supporters represent America’s marijuana playground.

The writer -IMO- has now proven him or herself full of shit three times, tying Hillary Clinton to issues she has nothing to do with, in an effort to make the candidate look bad. I had to stop reading.

Is there any reason, as a critical reader, to take anything this person writes at face value again?

Feel the Bern

Memes like this are beginning to show up all over my Facebook feed and they are really beginning to annoy the ever-loving shit out of me:


It seems that a substantial percentage of my friends -all of who I thought would know better, seeing as they’re middle-aged, fairly well-educated, politically-aware adults like myself- either believe in magic, have no idea how our political system works, or simply have no memory past last weekend. So let me be forthright: this will never happen, not even if Bernie Sanders is elected in a landslide.

But let me back up a moment. Most of the people I know, both online and in real life, know I am no fan of the Clintons. I have not liked either of those rat bastards since NAFTA, DOMA, and the PRWORA. That said, I don’t “like” politicians, at least not in the personal sense. I view them as tools to accomplish certain political goals, kind of like I view the various members of a football team. I don’t have to personally like any of the Philadelphia Eagles personally, as long as they crush Dallas. I don’t need to like Barack Obama so long as he’s fighting to advance goals I hold dear.

At this point in the country’s history, one of the two parties -the Republican Party- that control the country has gone completely fucking insane. They control both houses of Congress, and their nominees have a bare majority on the Supreme Court. Thanks to a combination of Democratic dumbassery and Republican gerrymandering, they control many statehouses as well. If we as a nation are to avoid becoming a far-right dystopia that even my conservative friends would recoil from, we must, at the very least, hold the Executive Branch. Ideally, we run a candidate who will have coattails and take back either the House or the Senate.

I am not going to address Booman’s rumination on whether Sanders would lose all 50 states, although I will recommend that you read it because it is salient, important, and accurate. Nor will I address Dick Polman’s argument that Sanders self-identification as a socialist renders him unelectable, although that is also a piece well worth your time. What I will address is the magical thinking and sheer ignorance of recent history that renders memes like that above foolish and dangerous: the fact of the matter is that it is not as simple as “We fund this shit by taking back the money that the 1% has been stealing from us for the past 50+ years.” This is as silly as anything that Nader’s supporters claimed back in 2000, and their silliness (aided by Al Gore’s incompetent campaign) helped “elect” George W. Bush, and we all know what happened after THAT.

Fun fact: a president is not a magician. Bernie Sanders, if elected, will have to deal with the same cast of Democratic and Republican douchebags that Obama dealt with. Anyone watching the progress of the Affordable Care Act should know that. Has everyone forgotten that some of the worst compromises on health care reform were made at the insistence of Democrats, or were you just not paying attention? Read up on Max Baucus, Bart Stupak, and Nebraska’s Ben Nelson. Read up on the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005, co-sponsored by Tom Carper. Read up on how a cabal of Democrats worked together to water down student loan debt reform. Barack Obama, let’s recall, was elected in a LANDSLIDE, and still had to work with these backbiters and thieves. With the Senate and the House firmly in the hands of the GOP -we may take back the Senate, but the House is probably out of reach- what makes you think that a Sanders victory would be any different? Even if it was another landslide?

I am so tired of the wishful thinking I keep seeing from people who should know better. I don’t care for Clinton at all, but if anyone is capable of making Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan eat a bag of dicks, it’s Hilary, who has already been through the GOP wringer. You’re electing a president, not a best friend. I’m not saying “don’t support or vote for sanders” but it is simply not a case of “elect Sanders and he’ll get the money back from the 1%”. That is a fucking PIPE DREAM. His own party will fight him tooth and nail. Be realistic.

And I wouldn’t be bringing any of this up, but for the fact that so many of these same people are saying if Sanders isn’t the nominee they won’t support Clinton. To them I say: You. Are. Fools. Clinton will not be a perfect president. Neither will Sanders. But both of these individuals will be a damn sight better than Trump, Cruz, Kasich, or any of the Republican candidates, who (with the likely exception of Trump) will be a rubber-stamp for whatever dog shit proposals the lunatics in the House and Senate will send to the White House.

This isn’t a very nice way of putting it, but grow the fuck up and get serious. You’re not electing a best friend. You’re not getting married til-death-to-us-part. You are electing someone who will advance your goals to one extent or another. Is Hillary sheisty in many ways? Sure. So is Obama, who you’ll recall fucked us on domestic surveillance, trade, and immigration. Or were you to busy making #feelthebern hashtags to notice?

What matters is whether the person in the White House is on our side. Both Clinton and Sanders are serious, thoughtful, and imperfect candidates. I admire your enthusiasm. Really, I do. But stop living in the Neighborhood of Make Believe, and for God’s sake stop encouraging people to believe in equally stupid Neighborhood of Make Believe pipe dreams that have absolutely no basis in reality or recent history.

Because if the result is President Cruz or Trump, I am blaming YOU.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz in Deep Sh*t

I think the first time I ever heard of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, current head of the DNC, was in 2008. Thatr’s when she was raked over the coals for refusing to support three Democrats who were campaigning against a bunch of right-wing Florida republicans she was friends with: She has worked with three of the…

In Which I Call Bullshit

I understand that the President is doing the whole “compare and contrast” thing, but it’s damned easy to call for progressive policies when you know there’s no chance of them passing: The Obama administration isn’t waiting until Tuesday night’s State of the Union address to let the American public know about the bold plans the…