There was a little piece today in my free morning paper (amNY) that caught my attention.
WASHINGTON — The Homeland Security Department’s former independent watchdog says he was twice summoned to then-Secretary Tom Ridge’s office last year and asked why his reports criticizing the agency were being sent to Congress and whether they could be presented more favorably to the department.
Ridge “was trying to get me not to give things to Congress and also to try to spin reports in a way most favorable to the department, and I resisted both of those,” former Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin said in an interview.
Watchdog Details Confrontations With Ridge
Ridge denies this:
Ervin’s statements are “untrue and deserve no further comment,” said Ridge, who left as secretary last month.
Read the interesting article, Inspector General Ervin does not mince words:
According to Ervin, Ridge asked, “What can we do to coordinate our messages on these reports so that you and we are saying the same thing about it?”
Ervin recalled: “I said, `I’m not in the spin business. We don’t coordinate our messages with the department. You can characterize it and spin it however you want, but that’s your business, not ours, and we’re not going to coordinate anything with you.'”
AS you will note from the article, IG Ervin is a former inspector general. I had missed this back in December, but here is what I found.
From USA Today on 27 December 2004:
By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — The government agency responsible for protecting the nation against terrorist attack is a dysfunctional, poorly managed bureaucracy that has failed to plug serious holes in the nation’s safety net, the Department of Homeland Security’s former internal watchdog warns.
Ervin lost his job this month in mysterious fashion. Appointed by President Bush in December 2003 when Congress was out of session, Ervin was never confirmed by the Senate. Nor was he renominated by the White House this month when his “recess appointment” — which lasted until the congressional session ended — expired Dec. 8.
A key senator won’t say why. Elissa Davidson, spokeswoman for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, wouldn’t comment on why Chairman Susan Collins, R-Maine, never held confirmation hearings for Ervin. “The decision not to renominate Clark Kent Ervin was purely a White House decision,” she said.
And then there is this: POGO Project on Government Oversight – follow the link to Post 9/11 Security. The DHS is trying to suppress even unclassified information. The Inspector General is not reconfirmed because the White House did not want it, yet
Congress created the federal system of inspectors general in response to the Watergate scandal.
(from the above link to amNY).
Now ex-IG Ervin states that Ridge tried to make him spin his reports to Congress.
I profess no knowledge beyond what this amNY-article stated and what I found on some links, but it seems that the DHS and the Administration are extremely eager and vigilant in ensuring a lid on things.
What’s going on?
Is a replacement in place?
Has anyone been nominated?
I tried to look, this was my first hit:
Vacancies in the DHS Inspector General’s Office. An incredible number of vacancies for what seems to be fairly senior positions. Maybe they’re not too keen on inspecting themselves?
Then the DHS’ own page. It would seem that there is currently an “Acting Inspector General”
Here and here
They don’t take the Office of the Inspector General for the DHS too seriously, it seems.
it seems the only people who don’t get reappointed or reupped are the ones who DO their jobs.
That’s a very good way to put it.
Maybe they have a work standard and ethics threshold, where the scales are reversed…
Thanks for the links. Really enjoyed the imagery on both sites.
Now; how to post images?
<img src="put link here">
I tried that last night Booman and it didn’t work. I had to link to a graphic instead (remember my Mata Froggy – covert GOP infiltration agent?)
Here, I’ll try placing it again (I bet it won’t work)
Okay, it worked that time, LOL, hmmmmm. Did you change something?
Nice job.
Someone should make a list of people who have left this adminstration in disgust and put all their quotes together.
That would be a powerful statement.
I don’t even know if IG Ervin left in disgust. Seems he enjoyed his job and wanted to stay on:
Above from Government Computer News last December 10.
Look at this: Statement by Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff before the House Appropriations Homeland Security Sub-Committee of 2 March 2005:
How will this comprehensive review take place after the Inspector General’s Office is totally ignored? No new Inspector General nominated and scores of vacancies.
want this site to be known for tin-foil hattery but I just can’t past this
Mindbending article.
Michael Chertoff, the man in charge of our Homeland Security was a lawyer for al-Qaeda before he took his job at the FBI and became the head of the 9/11 investigation.
And that scares the piss out of me. And if anyone can explain how a lawyer goes from the Senate Whitewater investigation to representing low-level fraudsters in NJ…
…worst…appointment…ever.
Must admit that I did not read more than the first couple of ‘pages’.
Any corroborating links on Chertoff representing NJ frauds? Cause that’s a strange career path.
If you google: Chertoff, HMO, New Jersey
you’ll get a bunch of stuff.
And if you have Lexis you’ll get even more.
You know I’m from Jersey and we got the best underworld out there.
All shapes and sizes. Kerik runs with the Sopranos types. Chertoff is trying to get Islamic radical money launderers for al-Qaeda off the hook for swindling the state of NJ out of millions.
It is pretty freaking scary if you allow yourself to dwell on it.
to collate comments from officials that left in disgust is great. I hope someone will take on the project.