Promoted from the diaries by pastordan. I think Fred is responding in part to my argument here, but I’m fairly confident he’d say our perspectives are not mutually exclusive. In any case, this is a typically well-researched and thoughtful post. A good model for diary newbies.
What can we do about the Christian Right? (I have been asked this, in response to various diaries on dKos.) This diary is the beginning of an answer. I suppose its directed to everyone, and no one in particular — except you, the reader. There is as you might imagine, no one short answer to the question. But farther down, I am going to offer one anyway. I am convinced that it is the place to begin; the lens through which to view all other elements of the struggle. It is the foundation. Without it, everything else are unconnected dots.
The good news is that its simpler than you may think, and you may already be doing it.
But no scrolling ahead! There are reasons why I save the answer til the end.
I was inspired, as I often am, to write this diary in response to the Christian Right itself. It happens that there is a small, but important Christian Right conference in Atlanta next month. It will not get the national attention that D. James Kennedy’s recent “Reclaiming America” conference received. And it will probably not be as large, or draw very many people from beyond Atlanta. But it is important for other reasons. The conference sponsor, American Vision, is one of the leading hubs of theocratic education and activism in the United States. And I think a look at the conference agenda, tells us much about the theocratic movement, and how it seeks to take power. And because this is so, or at least thats how it appears to me, it offers us some insight into what we must do in response.
The conference titled Restore America Rally looks from this distance, like an ideological indoctrination seminar in Christian nationalism, and a pep rally for the political movement that emanates from it. Let’s take a quick look at the featured speakers.
Gary DeMar, is the head of American Vision, which publishes books for the Christian school and Christian home school market. DeMar’s own books tend to be works of Christian historical revisionism, which among other things, seek to persuade young people that the U.S. was founded as a “Christian nation.” His first presentation at the conference, intended for young people, is on “America’s Christian Heritage.” This is one way of framing the basic premise of Christian nationalism. And it is important because it is a central underlying premise of all of the Christian Right, and is arguably a necessary ingredient to their success. But it is also a major weakness, because it is a premise that is more than faulty, its just plain wrong. I have written about this before, and there is plenty of good source material to support this, so I will not dwell on it here. But its a subject we all need to get very good at. I think it is part of the key to turning the tide.
DeMar’s vision for America, and his widening influence in the Christian Right in Georgia, and nationally, is disturbing. DeMar is a leader of the Christian Reconstructionist movement, which believes that the U.S. should be governed by a harsh theocracy and impose what they call “Biblical law.” I happen to have written a great deal about DeMar and his fellow theocrats in my book Eternal Hostility: The Struggle Between Theocracy and Democracy. Here is a sample: “Gary DeMar, in his book Ruler of the Nations wrote that “The law that requires the death penalty for homosexual acts effectually drives the perversion of homosexuality underground, back into the closet…”. The longterm goal, he adds, “should also be the execution of abortionists and the parents who hire them. If we say that abortion is murder, then we must call for the death penalty.’ DeMar claims that Christians ‘are not to impose a top-down tyranny to ram the Bible down people’s throats.’ However, he insists “we must elect public officials who say they will vote for Biblical laws.” (page 82)
Of course, DeMar probably won’t be talking about the more gruesome and totalitarian aspects of the theocratic agenda for America when he addresses young people at the Restore America Rally. The darker side of the Christian Nation will remain deep in the shadows until they are able to take power; and when they do, they will say they are only doing what God requires, even if it is unpleasant. Smart, if disingenuous politics.
During the evening rally, DeMar will answer a rhetorical question: “Is Reclaiming America a Futile Exercise?” And when he is done, young and old will learn just what they can do to restore America’s Christian heritage — the true intentions of the Founding Fathers that, sadly, have been so twisted and thwarted by secular humanism and the runaway federal judiciary.
They will hear a “challenge” from Sadie Fields, president of the Christian Coalition of Georgia. She will tell the rally goers, assembled in the pews of Trinity Chapel, that they can reclaim America by becoming active Christian citizens; by lobbying, and most importantly, engaging in electoral politics, and learning how to do it well — as has been key to the success of the Christian Coalition, and its historic role in transforming politics in the Republican Party, and in the country.
Finally, they will hear a stem winder from keynoter Roy Moore, who in the program is referred to as “Chief Justice.” Moore will tell his revisionist and self-serving account of how he violated the order of a federal judge to remove the monument to the Ten Commandments that he had installed in the Alabama state courthouse; and how he was fired for it by a panel of retired judges and how the courts turned down his appeals. Then he will tell his audience how the problem is “judicial tyranny,” and how he is standing tall, and remaining righteous and true to his understanding of his Oath of Office, and the will of God. People will see him as a hero of the faith, a Christian patriot, and a role model. He will also seek to persuade his audience that they, and the true intentions of the Founding Fathers have been betrayed, and that they must restore America’s Christian heritage and reclaim America.
Or something pretty close to that.
An aside: That Moore and his fans continue to use the title “Chief Justice,” tells us much about the culture of the theocrats. Moore was ousted from his post for his crackpot theatrics and his defiance of a federal court order. But notice in the bio on Moore’s web site, almost every sentence begins with “Chief Justice,” as if he were to the title born.
“Chief Justice Moore served our Country as a Captain in the Military Police Corps of the United States Army. He also served as Battalion Staff Officer at Ft. Riley, Kansas, and Illesheim, Germany, and as a Company Commander in Vietnam. During his professional career, Chief Justice Moore became the first full-time Deputy District Attorney in Etowah County and served in this position from 1977 until 1982. In 1984, Chief Justice Moore undertook private practice of law in Gadsden, until he became Circuit Judge, Sixteenth Judicial Circuit in 1992. Chief Justice Moore served in this capacity until his election as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama in November, 2000.”
It is a similar sense of entitlement that animates the Christian theocrats; they believe that God has anointed them, as Christian Right leader D. James Kennedy has put it, as“God’s vice-regents” The resentment they feel when they don’t get their way, often manifests itself in their political behavior.
There is a tendency, especially among those who are just learning about the Christian Right, to get very worked up about “the dominionists,” “the theocrats” and “the Reconstructionists,” and so on. And this is understandable. (If it wasn’t I wouldn’t have spent so many years learning and writing about these things.) But once you do know, once you do understand, what then? What do we do with what we have learned? How much information do we need to take action? Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that learning about the Christian Right is something we should not do, or ever stop doing. What I am saying is that one does not need to be an expert to begin to take action, and the knowledge that we gain should inform our activism.
Here is the good news. The answer lies in what the what the theocrats themselves are doing to gain power. Electoral politics. Yup. Electoral politics.
The Christian Right spent years systematically raising their constituency’s consciousness about politics and public policy; building a culture that includes, rather than excludes electoral politics, a culture that actually sees electoral politics as a natural outgrowth of their religious and home life. We need to find ways to do this in ways appropriate to our own communities, our own institutions. I am not talking about big opinions about what the Democratic Party should do; or what the mainstream churches or organized labor should do. I am talking about what I should do, and what you should do, in our own lives, our own communities, and the institutions we relate to. These will be different for most of us. I have been trying to do this in my own life, and this is part of why I write this diary. (My main involvement is Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts.)
So the next time someone starts breathlessly talking or writing about what “the dominionists” (or some other powerful opponents) are up to: Don’t panic. And don’t let that person panic. We know they’re bad. We know they have some considerable political strength and momentum. Take a deep breath. Do what most Kossacks do, or are learning to do. Electoral politics. Collectively, we have great power.
I repeat. The answer to the power of the Christian Right is electoral power of our own. No excuses. Many of us have tended to abandon this cornerstone of citizenship in favor of other things. It is time to get our priorities straight. Less talk, more action. Less entertainment, more citizen involvement. Less TV and sports. More electoral politics. Do we want the theocrats to win? More electoral politics.
Yeah, yeah, framing. Yeah, yeah, message. Yeah, yeah, netroots. Yeah, yeah, statements of principles. These, and more are important, and I am not minimizing them. They are all elements of electoral politics, elements of citizenship. It is the path to power in the United States. Each of us, as citizens have the right and the obligation to learn to do it well, just as the Christian Coalition and their allies have learned to do it well. If we believe that democracy is a good thing, we need to learn to get very good at it. We need to be better at it than those who would destroy it.
I don’t mean to be simplistic or glib. While the foundational idea is simple, I know the rest may be complicated and hard. But once we accept that orienting ourselves to electoral politics is the necessary foundation, everything else falls into place. Electoral politics is integral to citizenship in a constitutional democracy. How could it be otherwise? Voting alone is not enough. The survival of constitutional democracy depends on the active participation of the citizens. Did you know that the typical turnout for special elections for the state legislature in Massachusetts is 25%? Here in the bluest of the blue states? This kind of statistic is typical around the country, and the problem citizen disengagement and lack of particiaption needs to change. It’s possible; and it’s necessary.
And yes, we have some reclaiming to do ourselves. We need to reclaim American history and develop a better, accurate, competing narrative. And part of that narrative must also be our own stories of reclaiming the knowledge and skills it will take to also reclaim the power of citizenship.
Learning political and electoral skills, developing a good political culture in our communities and our institutions; establishing networks of political relationships; building for power — all takes time. But it will be time well spent. Let’s get to work.
[Adapted and Crossposted from FrederickClarkson.com]
You’ve always had the power.
When I first started hearing Falwell/Dobson etc many years ago I thought they were so on the fringe that they would be ignored. Meanwhile they were out starting christian law schools and journalism classes with christian slant to writing, starting the whole home schooling program with the decidedly christian viewpoint.
So here we are today and these people with their christian theocracy agenda are everywhere and it’s scary.
You’re right in that everything is local and we have to start locally, town by town and state by state.
So then next time someone starts breathlessly talking or writing about what “the dominionists” (or some other powerful opponents) are up to: Don’t panic. And don’t let that person panic. We know they’re bad. We know they have some considerable political strength and momentum. Take a deep breath.
Um, truly no disrespect, Fred, and you know how definitive and influential your writings have been for me, but MOST people DO NOT know they’re bad. MOST people DO NOT know about their political strength and momentum. The prevailing wisdom is that the supposed theocratic threat is a tin-foil paranoia of hateful atheists, and that at worst we are talking about a tiny fringe minority that need not be taken seriously, because “It can’t happen here”.
There IS no organized action to counteract this, because there is no acknowledgement of the threat outside a handful of people like you, and amateurs like me, who have been talking about this for the past decade. I can count the people on the fingers of one hand: Fred Clarkson, Joan Bokaer at theocracy watch, Kelly Leosis and Katherine Yurica at yuricareport, George Monbiot, writing mostly for the Guardian, one or two more. My “galiel’s canaries” warning the day after the election got some circulation and attention in the blogosphere, and then faded again from public consciousness, despite the fact that, day by day, the predictions made in that post are coming true.
People do NOT want to believe we are threatened by theocracy. People are also uncomfortable by the prospect of appearing to attack “religion”, the great American taboo. Moreover, most of the Left (along with most of the Right) is still wearing Marxian blinders, interpreting everything that happens as the result of the rich fighting the poor. We are still blind to the zealotry of Islam, but we are at least beginning to recognize that there is more at play than the mere legacy of colonialism and economic exploitation. But rare is the person who sees the Bush administration as anything other than a collection of greedy oil-men. This has blinded nearly everyone to the threat from true zealots who operate completely outside the rational arena.
The Left is divided, indecisive and weak on this subject, while the theocrats are united, focused and determined.
I’m afraid electoral activism will not be enough to counter this united, carefully planned assault on the foundations of democracy and republicanism in America.
Until we are willing to confront the role of faith in politics in general, we will continue to be vulnerable to zealotry. Until we teach our young people to think for themselves, critically and rationally, we will continue to be diffuse and nebulous in our defense against theocracy.
The tide is against us. The next generation will be less-educated, more indoctrinated, more vulnerable than the last. The theocrats have been working for decades from the ground-up, affecting society, culture, education, politics, and law at every level. And since their goal is the end of democracy, they have no compunctions about subverting it to achieve their ends.
I fear the real threat will not be recognized until it is too late, and the ballot-box is no longer an option for reform (I’m not sure it is even today). Like Germany faced with Nazism, we are making the same mistake of being reasonable and smug and overestimating the stability of our democracy in the face of critical internal threats.
I don’t disagree with your call, but I wonder mightily just who you think is heeding it. You talk as if it is a consensus among progressives that we face a theocratic threat from within. In my experience, nothing could be further from the truth.
point well taken. I do think tho, that enough people understand the threat of the Christian right as a political force, even if the word theocratic does not occur to them. It doesn’t need to be a huge number, it just needs to be enough people to begin to turn the tide. I think that is possble. It certainly won’t happen from you and I blogging the night away, but i do think this idea would work, and that it is consistent with what DFA, PDM and others are already doing.
I guess its my sense that as long as the countervailing forces are mobilized and able to electorally prevail over the CR, thats the desired result anyway. We can work on the other stuff as we go.
There are actually quite a few people in the mainline churches who have come to appreciate the threat of the Christian right, including the theocratic threat. If you read Bruce Prescott’s Mainstream Baptist blog, for example, its loud and clear there.
I am under no illusions that a vast electoral army of church state separationists is going to rise up because of my little diary, or anything else anyof us might write. But its part of the widening coversaton that IS going on.
I am speaking at a conference on the CR in NYC next month. I posted this diary in part as a way of field testing the ideas I want to present at the conference. I am the only one, as far as I know, whose job it is to say what to do. Its a great opportunity and a great responsibility.
So all ideas, objections, criques and so on, are extremely helpful, and will be put to good use.
Isn’t the proportion of Americans who are Bible thumpers steadily declining? They do outbreed us (one of my pet peeves, as a left-wing dad with two kids, and plans for more–but I need help!); but then they “lose” a fair number of their offpring to our side by the teen years, while we lose hardly any to theirs.
Alan
Maverick Leftist
Its less a matter of population, and more a matter of organization, and the knowledge, skills, and commitment it takes to make organization go.
Politics is neither a tide nor a pendulum. We need to look at resources: financial, organization, trained activists, and most precious of all, people’s time and attention. Without these, we are far overly subject to the slings and arrows of cruel fate (to borrow shamelessly from Shakespeare.)