Cross-posted at Daily Kos.
Late last night, I read the NYT‘s “Pentagon Will Not Try 17 G.I.’s Implicated in Prisoners’ Deaths.” (See Luam’s diary.)
Early this morning, after scanning the new headline stories at Reuters/Yahoo (“U.S. Troops Tortured Iraqis in Mosul, Documents Show”) and ABCNews (“U.S. Troops Tortured Iraqis in Mosul, Documents Show”), I became more infuriated after I went to the real source, the ACLU:
: : : Much more below : : :
Further, against practice, the FOIA documents were not turned over first to the requesting groups but to certain reporters:
In light of this, I will not quote from any news articles, and will exclusively rely on the ACLU site which does a masterful job of summarizing the contents of the 1,200 new pages — which you, as as citizen of the world, may also read, thanks solely to the hard work of the ACLU and its partner organizations in this long-fought effort, marked by delay after delay:
Quick Summary of the Mosul Torture Allegations:
- Abuse of a high school student detainee
- Death of detainee with no history of medical problems
- Soldiers being told to “beat the fuck out of detainees”
- Perceptions of chain of command endorsement of “pay-back”
Details of the Mosul Torture Allegations — gleaned by the ACLU from the FOIA Documentation:
+ Abuse of a high school student detainee:
Commander’s report of inquiry intobroken jaw of a high-school boy (such that the boy required his mouth to be wired shut and could eat only through a straw). The victim was told “to say that I’ve fallen down and no one beat me.” The report concluded that the broken jaw was caused either as a result of a blow by a U.S. soldier or a collapse due to “complete muscle failure” from being excessively exercised.
It found that “abuse of detainees in some form or other was an acceptable practice and was demonstrated to the inexperienced infantry guards almost as guidance” by 311th Battalion Military Intelligence personnel. Personnel “were striking the detainees,” and evidence suggested that the 311th Military Intelligence personnel and/or translators “engaged in physical torture of the detainees.” It was recommended that no punitive action be taken against the Commander of the Battalion. (See pp. 1173-1280)
+ Death of detainee with no history of medical problems:
Abu Malik Kenami died while in detention in Mosul, Iraq. The investigation speculates that Kenami may have suffered a heart attack.
On the day he died, Kenami had been “punished with ups and downs several times…and ha[d] his hands flex cuffed behind his back.” He was also hooded, with “a sandbag placed over [his] head.” “Ups and downs” are “a correctional technique of having a detainee stand up and then sit-down rapidly, always keeping them in constant motion.”
The file states that “[t]he cause of Abu Malik Kenami’s death will never be known because an autopsy was never performed on him.” Kenami’s corpse was stored in a “reefer van” for five days before it was turned over to a local mortician. (See pp. 1281 – 1333)
+ Soldiers being told to “beat the fuck out of detainees”:
Documents dated August 16, 2003, relating to an investigation into “alleged ROE and Geneva Convention violations” in Iraq include sworn statements relating to “Bulldog 6” telling soldiers to “take the detainee[s] out back and beat the fuck out of them.” (See pp. 1584-1613)
+ Perceptions of chain of command endorsement of “pay-back”:
An informal investigation into an incident of abuse by soldiers while they were dropping detainees off for further questioning by the “3BCT MIT team” in Iraq. The MIT team saw the soldiers kicking blindfolded and “zipcuffed” detainees several times in the sides while yelling profanities at them. The investigation concludes that at least three TF 2-70 did abuse the detainees and adds that “some of the TF 2-70 may perceive that the chain-of-command is endorsing `pay-back’ by allowing the units most affected by suspected detainee actions to play the greatest role in bringing those suspects to justice.” (See pp. 1619-1755)
The page numbers noted above relate to PDF documents posted online
Update [2005-3-26 9:32:40 by susanhbu]: From the ACLU press release:
“These documents provide further evidence that the torture of detainees was much more widespread than the government has acknowledged,” said ACLU attorney Jameel Jaffer. “At a minimum, the documents indicate a colossal failure of leadership.”
The ACLU, along with Human Rights First, earlier charged Rumsfeld “with direct responsibility for the torture and abuse of detainees in U.S. military custody.”
Details about the Rumsfeld lawsuit are online
It’s only the groups like the ACLU, Human Rights First — and their partners in the above FOIA action, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Physicians for Human Rights (no URL?), Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans for Peace.
Why don’t we contribute to these groups above today out of our Easter basket proceeds — or other funds? We can begin with contributing to the ACLU.
And we can pray the ACLU keeps on the government, and then that something comes of it — unlike the cases just abandoned by the U.S. Army, according to the New York Times.
But why oh why must the ACLU needlessly piss off people by using phrases like:
“what for many is a holiday weekend”
No reason not to call it Easter. By catering to those who would blow a sprocket at the mere mention of a religious holiday, the ACLU seems to be telling people who do call it Easter weekend (even non-Christians like myself) that they are either coarse and rude for using such divisive terms, or even worse that they are unwelcome.
Of course this isn’t true- the ACLU has fought tooth and nail for the rights of everyone, including Christians. But using language like that plays right into the elitist stereotype.
OTOH, They still get some Easter Turkey from me.
Their point is that dumping bad news on a late Friday afternoon is typical Bush practice …. that it’s a holiday for many makes it more sure that even fewer people will see the story. I’m not going to fuss about it much …
my fury is reserved solely for the widespread indoctrination in the use of torture by the U.S. military, and its utter abdication of any semblance of honoring the Geneva Conventions or all other international law, not to mention common decency.
when the nation has cried havock and loosed the dogs of war.
As I told BooMan lo these many years ago- if we engage in this war of choice the Republic is dead.
Passivity in the face of the GOP “riots” in Florida allowed a lawless executive to emerge. The invasion of Iraq created precedent for lawless exercize of that executive authority.
The Congress has surrendered to lawlessness as exemplified in its in intervening in the Schiavo case and, to mix metaphors, the only Rubicon uncrossed is the Judiciary. This explains the constant drumbeat of attacks on our courts.
That leaves only the people to stand in the way of the tyrant. Fortunately there are great people in this country- like the fine soldiers and officers in the U.S. military who had the courage to even create the documents that have exposed the torture and murder schemes of this administration. And like the local Chief of Police in Florida who beleived in Rupuclican government enough to face down Jeb Bush’s pratoreans when they came to kidnap Ms. Schiavo on Thursday.
Beautifully written. I wish you’d turn it into its own diary … extended, of course.
P.S. I missed the story about “Jeb Bush’s pratoreans when they came to kidnap Ms. Schiavo” and the police chief … I’ve been avoiding the story best I can. Must look it up. (And has anyone written a diary with him as a hero?)
You assume that the Chief of Police of Pinellas Park is a he–
Nope She’s a she, and a navy veteran to boot.
Link to Miami Herald Story
Chief of Police Doreen Thomas’s Bio– Can we clone her?
Also to be held in high regard- Everett Rice, Pinellas County Sherrif and one of eight republican legislators in Florida who opposed the illegal acts of the FL legislature in Ms. Schiavo’s case:
“I tried to vote my conscience and not necessarily do what’s popular,” Rice said. “I wasn’t counting votes. I think the Republicans might have misread this thing.”
Link- warning to freeperland
Um, talk about language that plays right into stereotypes 🙂
Saying “what for many is a holiday weekend” neither disparages those who celebrate it not suggests in any way shape or form anything but a simple combination of a) respect for those who do, and b) a recognition of those who do not.
Is it not a useful thing to remind us all that we are a nation of diverse beliefs, none of which is held to be officially privileged or sanctioned, and to encourage tolerance of all of them? Frankly, I am nonplussed by your reaction to the most innocuous phrase.
Thesis: The phrase in question “what for many is a holiday” conveys less information that “Easter”.
Proof:
Thesis two: It requires wore work to use the phrase than to use “Easter”.
Proof: More letters, more bandwidth. De Minimus but true.
Axiom: Doing more work to communicate information than is required is the result of either inefficiency or intentional purpose. If the latter, the extra work is directed at a purpose other than the communication.
Conclusion: the ACLU either, A) Added inefficiency to their attempt to communicate information about government wrongdoing to “remind us all that we are a nation of diverse beliefs, none of which is held to be officially privileged or sanctioned, and to encourage tolerance of all of them,” or B) “[R]ecogni[zing]… those who do not” celebrate Easter by refusing to name the holiday.
If A), then the ACLU is going off message and plugging two missions at once, bad PR by a good organization.
or Certain Christians will either feel patronized because of the implication that it is they that need to be reminded that “we are a nation of diverse beliefs, none of which is held to be officially privileged or sanctioned” by refusing to use one of their major holidays as a temporal reference point OR if B) then they will be downright offended at the idea that there are those who find them so icky that it pains them to read, use or say the word Easter and who require or deserve recognition in public forums.
Should we call Labor day weekend “what is for some a holiday weekend” in recognition of those that have to work during the holiday? or in recognition of folks who like living in “right to work” states? You’d sure piss off some Union guys if you did, so I don’t want to find out.
I also agree with everyone that this is a very small point. I wouldn’t be (an am not) the least bit offended by direct attempts to de-establish religious holidays from government recognition. That could be a good thing for both the state and religion.
However, pursuing the noble agenda you’ve ascribed to the ACLU in the context of trying to adress war crimes serves neither purpose well.
As much as we talk about how the Democratic party and allies need to improve communications, we see very little direct implementation of even the most basic rules of rhetoric, such as don’t confuse two issues in one statement.
You are prolific. And you do this for free?
My conscience would pay me back big time if I didn’t :):) Thank you.
Thank you for another great piece of reporting, Susan. I appreciate your work (as much as it sickened me to read the findings)
Although my cynical distrust has me reading between the lines of pretty much everything nowadays, I personally didn’t take exception to the “holiday weekend” comment. I simply took it as a way to reflect the lack of attention this issue will receive, rather than political correctness surrounding Christian Holy days.
Where is the outcry, and what can we do without checks and balances to keep this administration in check? And why the hell is Rumsfeld still in power? I’m deeply saddened for the Iraqi detainees, and I’m fearful for the implications to U.S. soldiers who may become POWs.
This is horrible beyond words, I am glad you posted it as much as I hate to read it. I have sent my paltry contribution to the aclu-if I had more it would be more-but there must be something more we can do? I’ve tried writing ltes, I’ve contacted my reps. etc but it seems so little in the face of this outrage! There has to be some way to stop this, some way to see justice done. These people are committing war crimes in our names, it’s obscene! I’m sorry I am rambling, I’m just so angry and heart sick I don’t know how to express myself clearly.
Remember, soldiers don’t torture people. Torture tortures people. And they’re just following orders.