I was doing a little research and accidentally came across this little stink bomb: the IRS is going to hire private collection agencies to squeeze errant taxpayers.
Well, you say, it’s not as if some guy named Vito is going to threaten to break your legs, right? Oh yeah… right
Isn’t that just special? Do Conservatives really think that this will make government smaller? Will it enhance our right to privacy? Isn’t funneling government money to private corporations just stealing? Maybe huge tax cuts and the resulting cuts in revenue have a teensie bit to do with this?
“Taxation is something the government uniquely does. The government has coercive power over individuals to pay up. That should be a government function, not a private one.”
Under the plan, set to start by the end of the year, the government would transmit Social Security numbers and other information on tax evaders to one of as many as 12 companies that land the contracts.
Proponents point out that more than 40 states use private companies to recoup taxes.
“We have a backlog of cases and not enough people to do this work,” he said.
Morgante, who is leading the project, said the IRS would use outsiders on the easiest cases — ones in which, for example, a taxpayer has admitted owing money but hasn’t paid.
That would free federal employees to take on more complicated cases that require enforcement action, such as seizing property and filing liens.
And although the collection firm’s compensation will be tied to collections, the pay of individual employees will not, according to the plan, which is being completed.
“The company will get paid that way, but the workers won’t,” he said. “They are going to be held to the same standards as government employees.”
From 1988 to 2003, the number of individual returns grew by 26 percent, while the IRS’ permanent staff dropped 31 percent, according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a research group affiliated with Syracuse University.
Consequently, audit rates reached record lows.
During this period, the IRS tested a privatization program. Private companies earning flat fees were hired to contact about 125,000 tax evaders and remind them of their overdue bills but not arrange payment.
Congress canceled the project midway after discovering it was costing more than it was making. A treasury audit also found that contractors had called outside of allowed hours — either too early in the morning or too late at night — and failed to protect sensitive data.
But those who want to try again say technology has improved, and companies have more experience doing this kind of work for governments.
Morgante said 81 companies have shown interest in the federal work.
Using the Education Department’s student loan recovery program as a model, contractors could expect to pocket about 17 percent of what they collect, a debt recovery expert said. The rate could be higher initially to help lessen start-up costs.
But Colleen Kelley, the president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents IRS workers, said that any plan that ties collections to profit will spur aggressive tactics and undo reforms Congress enacted in 1998 to curb abuses.
In 1997, the Senate held hearings, stretching over three days, on IRS “horror stories.” Leading segments on the evening news showed agency employees, hidden behind screens with their voices disguised, accusing management of targeting the poor.
Internal audits released the next year found that the IRS had improperly seized property from taxpayers in more than 25 percent of cases studied from 1997.
This is going to be a return to the old thug-like tactics of the IRS, this time perpatrated by private collection agencies with everything to gain. Read the whole article here This story is passing way under the radar at this point. The article also says that contracts will be awarded and the system in place by the end of this year. Another example of the horrors that are America Under Bush. Cross posted at dkos.
Definitely. I hadn’t heard a peep about this until reading your diary, Nag.
Needless to say, I think this is a crock. I don’t want some collection agency hack getting hold of social security numbers and tax information. The government needs to find a way to handle this and keep private companies out of it.
The way the article reads, it’s almost a done deal. All that’s left to do is award the contracts. Like I said, it was an accidental find. I then Googled it and found nothing else. Don’t forget that those collection agency hacks will most likely have no governmental oversight… hell, the government itself has no oversight, why should they even care about a few (million)taxpayers getting burned by these agencies?
When do we get the right, to go after all the tax monies this administration has given to the corporations, the wealthy, loopholes for oil companies, private contracts for supporters, etc, etc,
The only CRISIS in this country is the current administration.
If we recouped all those monies mentioned above, we would be back in surplus, the way the thieving bastards started…..gggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
(shak’n my head)
I’m on a news-reading tare this afternoon.
IRS may want share of money from Ebay sales
By MARY DALRYMPLE
Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Hawking baby and children’s clothes, along with some garage sale and thrift store bargains, on eBay helps Sunni Wojnarowsky bring in some extra money so she can afford to stay home with her two young boys.
The additional dollars are great, but does she really need to hassle with the paperwork and report her small profit to the Internal Revenue Service? Her question, posed to the online auction site’s discussion board for sellers, generated much advice — and more confusion.
“You can’t get an answer from anybody,” Wojnarowsky said in an interview from her home in Brunswick, Ohio. “It would be nice to have a straightforward answer of yes, you file taxes, or no, you don’t.”
More than 135 million people have registered to use the auction site that calls itself “the world’s online marketplace.” Buyers bought more than $34 billion worth of merchandise there last year.
Some people make money by cleaning out items from their closets; others use the site to run small businesses.
In tax law, there is no clear, bright line that separates fun from profit, or a hobby from a business. But IRS instructions make it clear that all income — a category that includes bribes, gambling winnings, kickbacks and money made in illegal activities — can be taxed.
“When you’re working on the Internet, it’s kind of a gray issue,” said Bart Fooden, a certified public accountant in Woodbury, N.Y., who advises small businesses and individuals. “The big issue is whether you’re doing it as a business or not.”
The IRS can apply a list of nine indicators that might prove whether someone’s online auctions amount to a business. These indicators include evidence that the taxpayer depends on the income, acts in a businesslike manner, or puts enough time and effort into the activity to suggest a profit motive.
Fooden said the difference between a hobby and a business can often be the seller’s intent.
If someone is selling the junk that is collecting dust in a garage or basement, then that person probably is getting less than he paid for it. No profit here.
If someone is buying goods in bulk from a wholesaler and hoping to make a couple extra bucks reselling each one, then that person could have just started a profitable business, Fooden said.
Some categories are not so clear.
If a great-aunt’s collection of antique china fetched top dollar from collectors, that might mean capital gains taxes are owed.
If someone scours neighborhood garage sales for great deals on comic books to resell on eBay, that might amount to running a business.
It often is best to ask a tax professional, said Bob Miller, who says he spends about 18 hours a day on eBay, selling collectable postage stamps and advising other buyers and sellers from his home in northern Utah.
“When the person that you owe the money to can throw you in jail, it’s always a good idea to get professional advice,” he said.
eBay spokesman Chris Donlay said the company does not report individual sales to the tax authorities. eBay urges users, in the site’s educational materials and seminars, to learn about tax issues.
“It’s really up to the seller, just like offline,” he said. “We are just a venue, really. We’re sort of like the mall landlord or the owner of the parking lot where the flea market happens.”
It takes so little effort to set up shop on eBay that some might overlook the tax issues, Miller said.
“If you have an e-mail address, you can start selling. If you’re a U.S.-based seller, you need to have a credit card and a bank account,” Miller said.
“People have a feeling that they’re selling on eBay, they’re not a business. It’s not true. If you are selling and making a profit, you have to declare it.”
An eBay survey last year found that 430,000 of its U.S. sellers make a significant portion or all of their revenue from selling on eBay.
While it might sound like nothing good can come of the headache involved in claiming a small profit from online auctions, consider the perks. Business expenses can be deducted from profits. That includes the cost of the goods sold, fees, supplies and maybe a home office — if the qualifications are met.
Wojnarowsky said she plans to report her eBay profits, which she estimates at roughly $2,000, but she is not looking forward to it.
Last year, the Wojnarowsky paid a $400 tax preparation fee, which included a business schedule to report online auction earnings. This year, they will crunch the numbers themselves using tax preparation software.
“I talked to a friend of mine who does eBay, and she’s not filing because she said it’s not regulated,” Wojnarowsky said. “But my fear is, yeah, but what if you’re wrong? I don’t want to pay the fine.”