Papa says:
Everybody has predicted his demise, but then Chalabi keeps on reappearing–whether as disgraced banker, Pentagon favorite, or, per the CIA, Iranian spy,etc. The latest metamorphosis was when he suddenly resurfaced, to the amazement of his enemies in a two-way race with a fellow Shiite for the post of Iraqi Prime Minister, but then gracefully stepped aside for Ayatollah Ali al Sistani’s man. It’s almost certain he will be appointed to an influential cabinet post. He was always a survivor–first with the collapse of the Petra Bank (escaping in the trunk of a car), for which a Jordanian court sentenced him in absentia to 22 years of hard labor, for using the bank as his own “piggy bank”. Then Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney embraced him for his bogus intelligence about weapons of mass destruction. After Saddam’s fall, his brother Salem was handed a massive budget to organize war crimes tribunals, while Ahmed at the behest of the US Provisional Authority, was given the task of dismantling the Baath Party. In that role, he seized land and property owned by Baathists and acquired personal control over Saddam’s intelligence files on Baath Party membership. This made him a powerful player and darling of the Shiites, who out of revenge wanted the Baath Party structure totally destroyed, which led to the humiliation of Baathists with military experience, especially those who could have helped stabilize the country. (Of course the Shiites are coming to power in an Arab country for the first time in a thousand years!)
Yet 5 months after he sat next to Laura Bush at the State of the Union, US soldiers surrounded his home/headquarters and held him at gunpoint, while seizing his computers and personal files. He in turn fled to Iran, while the CIA leaked that he was an Iranian spy, who had placed sources in danger by providing Iranian intelligence with codes to break US intercepts on Iranian communications. But instead of being arrested and charged with money laundering, etc., he won the confidence of Sistani and returned months later, also supported by the Shiite Daiwa Pary and the cleric, Moqtada Al-Sadr. Numerous sources have confirmed that President Bush blames him for the Iraqi intelligence failures and intensly dislikes him. In fact during a recent telephone call with King Abdullah of Jordan, Bush told the king that he could “piss on Ahmed Chalabi”. In contrast neo-cons like Perle continue to publicly defend their former golden boy. Maybe they never understood that Chalabi was only conerned about his own agenda (not an uncommon attitude in the Mid-East). Does he have 9 more lives???
Incredible!/”Incroyable”! The saga of Iraq contines–tune in tomorrow, for the further adventures of Ahmed Chalabi. Or is it Houdini?
Chalabi needed to become an enemy of the USA in order for him to regain some credibility in Iraq. Do you have a source for the Bush “piss-on” Chalabi remark?
Sounds like deliberately leaked bullshit to me.
hey booman..just noticed FAQ still says you’ve been around about a week…just might what to update…
Will check in with Papa on the Piss remark…
Clearly the Bush | Cheney | Rove team have NEVER been misled. The NEOCONS had their plans for the Middle East Peace [OIL] concept drawn up years ago. The “pissed off or on” charade is for the “buhne” or public consumption only.
Numerous sources have confirmed that President Bush blames him for the Iraqi intelligence failures and intensly dislikes him. In fact during a recent telephone call with King Abdullah of Jordan, Bush told the king that he could “piss on Ahmed Chalabi”.
In contrast neo-cons like Perle continue to publicly defend their former golden boy. Maybe they never understood that Chalabi …
Perle’s defence of Chalabi is to be interpreted as a pretense to save face and his own credibility. Never say you made a mistake or misjudgement. The interpretation of all false intelligence was what the feud between State – Powell – and DoD – Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and Feith – was all about. Which agenda to follow. Dick Cheney’s operation since Election 2000 was the determination to get Saddam Hussein [`s OIL] no matter what.
When it became clear in Iraq which side Chalabi chose, the Iranian influenced people, the DoD team had to disgrace Chalabi and move forward with other puppets. Nothing wrong with WH IQ.
Topic is crucial in past and future debate on Iraq issue, so a recommendation well deserved.
Oui – Liberté – Egalité – Fraternité
… on the future development of important investments in Iran. Clearly the nuclear facilitities [FOSSIL deposits] in Iran is a major issue. Halliburton website.
The Board should be assured however, that the U.S. Sanctions do not prohibit them as individuals, or as the Halliburton Company Board of Directors, from having knowledge of the activity there.
As far as Pakistan’s cooperation with the US administration in the War on Terror, after the initial political pressure on president and dictator Musharraf, all was well soon. Now large amount -$$$bn- US taxpayers money flowing into Pakistan’s failing economy. The primary recipients of US tax money? Right, Halliburton et al and contracts to map and survey Pakistan’s OIL resources.
These tids & bits have all been published before, it doesn’t stick as a major news item and is forgotten. We have a war on our hands!
Oui – Liberté – Egalité – Fraternité
Of course the Shiites are coming to power in an Arab country for the first time in a thousand years!
Holy toledo!!!
No no no no no, not even close to being true.
Shi’ites rule and are the majority (70%) in Bah’rain, which is as Arab as you get.
There was a Shi’ite monarchy who led what was formerly North Yemen prior to 1967 as well.
Shi’ite governments also rule in both Iran as well as Azerbaijan.
For the record, there are large Shi’ite populations in Turkey (15%), Libya (31%), Kuwait (30%), Afghanistan (15%), Pakistan (20%) and Saudi Arabia (about 10%).
Pax
Is the byline Judith ” I was [xxxxxxx] right” Miller? So, that’s what she’s been doing lately. She’s always been a PR flack.
Roger Ailes (no, not that one)