Update [2005-3-30 11:15:28 by susanhbu]: “The United States is holding about 10,500 prisoners in Iraq, more than double the number held in October, the military says.” (MSNBC)
Thanks again to the ACLU, we now have a copy of the “smoking gun” 2003 memo signed by Gen Ricardo Sanchez, then commander of US forces in Iraq.
Reports the BBC, “the Sept. 2003 document … authorised interrogation techniques including the use of dogs, stress positions and disorientation.” The ACLU press release notes:
The existence of the memo had been widely rumored, but this is the first time that the memo has been released. …
But what about Sanchez’s “no way, not me!” testimony before Congress?
Troutfishing posted a diary at Daily Kos this morning — “Citizen-journalist finds apparent proof of Sanchez perjury concerning torture” — that caught my eye. Amongst Troutfishing’s morning e-mail, he says he spotted this:
It appears that nobody else has made the connection.….
I [Susan’s note: The “I” is Mark Kraft] posted on my journal at insomnia.livejournal.com about a memo that the ACLU released late today, indicating that Gen. Sanchez signed off on 29 interrogation techniques, including 12 which far exceeded limits established by the Army’s own Field Manual.
The memo also indicates that Gen. Sanchez committed perjury when testifying before Congress.
From Sanchez’s testimony on May 19, 2004::
SANCHEZ: “Sir, that may be correct that it’s in a news article, but I never approved any of those measures to be used within CJTF-7 (Abu Grhaib) [sic] at any time in the last year.”
The memo, Troutfishing reports, specifically details his approval for the following techniques, as expressed verbatim from the document :
wording, not mine.)
Specifically, in at least two instances, he signed off on practices that by his own admission were intended to create and exploit fear. He approved, frankly, the exact practices he said under oath that he did not approve.
Also of note from the ACLU on March 1, 2005:
You may view the ACLU’s copy of Sanchez’s memorandum.
Trouthfishing provides a link to “Sanchez’ sworn testimony before the Congressional committee.”
Emphases mine and Troutfishing’s.
“On the Judy Woodruff CNN program with Bob Novak at 3:50 p.m.ET, the discussion centered on the promotion of Gen. Ricardo Sanchez to 4-Star General. He was the military head of the Abu Ghraib prison during the period in 2003 when the prisoner abuses took place.”
link
No reports yet of when he will be receiving his fifth star.
Your handle on information always amazes me.
That is a compliment I will cherish dearly.
If a duck shits in Zanzibar, you know on whose petunia and with what curses it was shooed from the garden.
🙂
You know, I am convinced your posts are getting weirder 🙂
It was the butterfly in China flapping its wings – your comments are purely the product of sublime chaos theory.
instead commander of troops in theater (Iraq), which means that military head of prison, Brig General Janet Karpinski, was under his command.
Methinks this is an important distinction, don’t you?
To my knowledge, General Karpinsky was not promoted.
Despite the indiscretion of a few low-ranking camera enthusiasts, under the command of General Sanchez, US policies have been consistently implemented according to the will and desires of those who pay for it.
This is big–and will get bigger!
Thank God for the ACLU! Go make a donation, now.
And thanks for this diary.
to help end violence … Amnesty, IANSA and Oxfam have just launched a global campaign aiming to stop gun running and control the arms
trade – and they need your support now. Simply go to Million Faces.
I was not aware of this – an excellent extension of the “I’m Sorry” initiative.
I haven’t looked at the other countries but what struck me was the number of nice, ordinary people from Wales that had posted their pictures. By which I mean, not the faces of the usual anarchist rent a mob (I know, that all sounds right-wing but surely you know what I mean). It was this ordinary, not your usual protesters that made the peace marches in London so effective and which so stirred up the politicians.
Really is worth highlighting by means of a separate front page diary, Susan.
Did anyone really think he was telling the truth when he testified? It seems that one sure way to tell if someone is lying in this administration is if Bush promotes them. That appears to be a consistant pattern.
And if much of this is reported in the MSM I will be colored amazed.