Cross-posted at DailyKos. The White House today nominated Zalmay Khalilzad to be American ambassador to Iraq. “Khalilzad has been the odds-on favorite to replace John Negroponte,” say the NY Times and Village Voice, which notes:
[NYT] ran 592 words and referred to Khalilzad’s high school basketball career and his graduate work … The Sun printed 770 words [about his] job as the envoy to Afghanistan …
[N]either paper mentioned Khalilzad’s work for Unocal [which] included negotiating with the Taliban over a pipeline [across] Afghanistan in the 1990s.
I note that not even The Village Voice revealed that Khalilzad — a protégé of Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz — “is a member of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC).”
The Village Voice continues:
But it also seems weird to make nothing out of it–and especially to mention key points of his resume but not the Unocal stint.
Of course, it is possible the reporters simply didn’t know about the Unocal connection. While the link was mentioned in “Fahrenheit 9/11” and several articles about that movie, it is not noted in the State Department’s official biography of the diplomat. But a State Department spokesman confirms Khalilzad did work for Unocal.
SourceWatch.org has the low-down on Khalilzad, including his nickname of “Viceroy”:
Zalmay Khalilzad, “the most senior Afghan-American” and highest-ranking Muslim to serve in the Bush administration,[1] became the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan in November 2003. He headed the Bush-Cheney transition team for the Defense Department in 2000 and has been a Counselor to Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.[2]
He is a member of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and was one of the signers of the [letter to Clinton].
In September 2004, Khalilzad was charged with trying to influence the October 9 Afghan presidential elections. “Several [Afghan presidential] candidates … maintain that the U.S. ambassador and his aides are pushing behind the scenes to ensure a convincing victory by the pro-American incumbent, President Hamid Karzai,” reported the Los Angeles Times. One candidate, Mohammed Mohaqiq, said Khalilzad had asked him and others to withdraw from the race: “They have been doing the same thing with all candidates. That is why all people think that not only Khalilzad is like this, but the whole U.S. government is the same. They all want Karzai — and this election is just a show.”[3]
Khalilzad denied the charges, but the Los Angeles Times notes: “Khalilzad has been nicknamed ‘the Viceroy‘ because the influence he wields over the Afghan government reminds some Afghans of the excesses of British colonialism. … Delegates to gatherings that named Karzai interim president in 2002 and ratified Afghanistan’s new Constitution last December also accused the ambassador of interfering, even of paying delegates for their support.”[4]
Joel Brinkley summarizes Khalilzad’s network in the Bush administration as follows:
“Mr. Khalilzad, a protégé of Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz since long before Mr. Bush took office, served as a senior director on the president’s national security council staff during the early years of Mr. Bush’s first term.”[5]
The Sunni Sisters blog adds the following about Khalilzad’s wife:
Cheryl Benard is an Austrian-born self-styled feminist who has, in the past, written several rather offensive novels about Muslim women. A trained sociologist, she is married to Zalmay Khalilzad, the Afghan-born Bush diplomat and National Security Council advisor who happens to be a former RAND analyst, UNOCAL representative to the Taliban, and protegee of Paul Wolfowitz. Benard and Khalilzad met while they were doing graduate work at the University of Chicago, where Khalilzad was mentored by Albert Wohlstetter, an influential neo-con theorist who also mentored Wolflwitz, and Ahmed Chalabi.
Khalilzad was also an associate at the Project for a New American Century, and one of twenty-five PNAC associates who sent a letter to President Clinton in 1998 calling on him to invade Iraq. The signatories included Donald Rumsfeld, William J. Bennett, William J. Kristol, Richard Perle, and Paul Wolfowitz. Other PNAC associates, supporters, and thinkers have, in the past, included J. Danforth Quayle, Elliot Abrams, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, and Francis Fukuyama. In other words, it’s the cream of the neo-con and right-wing crops.
I need more time to process this, but just wanted to mention a reminder that Karzai also was a Unocal employee. Not that that means anything, or anything…
Why am I not reassured by this? Why? Why? Why?
As the PNAC choir sings, “I’m in with the In-Crowd” Kahlilzad steps forward to the microphone and proclaims “Iraqifazation is Our Goal! Bunnies can still dance in the streets of Bagdad! You Never Had It So Good! I am your leader! until we find an Iraqi!”
How much more incestuous can all this get for god’s sake? Oh yeah and heaven forbid that any reporter will ask him about the Unocal/Tailban/pipeline thingy.
And another oh yeah, I think Dan Quayle would be in the supporter group not the ‘thinker’ group, wouldn’t ya think? I really try not to make to many snarky comments as that doesn’t promote much insight but well..just shit, huh.
Please, please stop fantasising about this pipeline. Yes, they talked about it a lot, yes there was some lobbying, but the thing is this pipeline WILL NEVER be built, because it makes no sense.
This whole “Taliban” pipe is just an exercise in diplomacy with Russia and India, but it will not happen.
you can use that if you think it will be more believable. 🙂
Given the obstacles to development of a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan, it seems unlikely that such an idea will make any progress in the near future, and no major Western companies have expressed interest in reviving the project. The security situation in Afghanistan remains an obvious problem, while tensions between India and Pakistan make it unlikely that such a pipeline could be extended into India and its large (and growing) gas market. Financial problems in the utility sector in India, which would be the major consumer of the natural gas, also could pose a problem for construction of the TAP line. Finally, the pipeline’s $2.5-$3.5 billion estimated cost poses a significant obstacle to its construction. link
but I will add that even if Afghanistan suddenly became secure and Western oil companies got to be interested, the pipeline would still not make economic sense and would not be financed.
US Nuclear Offers Throw Pipeline Projects With Iran, Pakistan into Disarray
Chevrontexaco Buys Unocal
India, China locked in energy game
Woo EU gas investors, energy body tells Turkmen
SourceWatch.org — quoted above — talks about it in the past tense, and as a natural gas pipeline:
I missed this yesterday at Sourcewatch.org, and it’s something to think about in terms of his political astuteness as an ambassador:
Just as oil industry conflicts of interest have not been a concern for the Bush administration in its appointments, Khalilzad’s historic support for the Taliban seems not to be either,” wrote the environmental, anti-mining group Project Underground of Khalilzad’s ambassadorship.
He wrote at least two Washington Post editorials during that time period that were clearly inaccurate, and were blantant attempts to promote the Taliban as decent business partners and paragons of moderation.
hi Jerome, I didn’t mean that there was going to be a pipeline I meant more in general terms that someone bush was appointing had ties to big oil interests. Which is something reporters should at least mention or even investigate his background on. Given that many people think Iraq was invaded for oil.
Again. These people.
Just in case anyone here hasn’t read the letter from the PNAC to Clinton in 1997 (or even if you just haven’t read it lately) here’s the link. It never fails to blow my mind. From the letter:
Signatories to the letter: Elliott Abrams, Richard L. Armitage, William J. Bennett, Jeffrey Bergner, John Bolton, Paula Dobriansky, Francis Fukuyama, Robert Kagan, Zalmay Khalilzad, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Peter W. Rodman, Donald Rumsfeld, William Schneider, Jr., Vin Weber, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, and Robert B. Zoellick.
And while you’re checking out their website, there’s always the “Statement of Principles,” which includes
Many of the same names as signers of the Statement (including Khalilzad) but add Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush.
hi janet, I agree that we should all probably reread PNAC periodically to remind us of how blatantly they’ve set out their goals-for everyone to see except that not that many people are even aware of the PNAC.
Another thing I blame the media for-not making this a big story in itself.