Why don’t you tell Congress where you stand? Here, we’ll make it easy for you. More below about little-discussed treacherous repayment schemes:
From today’s NewStandardNews.net:
Though federal legislation to protect credit card companies is receiving a share of criticism for shifting the burden of bankruptcy onto the poor, few have noticed the new rules could indirectly enforce treacherous repayment schemes.
Apr 5 – With bankruptcy reform legislation on the fast track to becoming law later this year, consumer advocates are issuing new warnings about abusive lenders and fake nonprofit credit counseling and debt management firms.
The bankruptcy reform bill has already passed the Senate and is expected to easily pass through the House of Representatives. The legislation is heavily backed by the credit industry, which spent more than $40 million on political fundraising and lobbying for the changes. But the proposed reforms have come under fire from consumer protection and industry watchdog groups. Most publicized are concerns that the legislation will make it harder for indebted individuals to find real debt relief through bankruptcy protection by requiring many debtors to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, in which the debtor is required to set up a repayment plan; instead of Chapter 7, in which some assets are seized, but debts are erased.
But a less talked about provision of the bill would require people seeking bankruptcy protection to first seek credit counseling, a prerequisite widely seen by consumer advocate groups as an opportunity for the debt counseling industry to profit off people in desperate financial circumstances.
“We’re concerned that this is basically giving carte blanche to an entire for-profit industry,” said Linda Sherry, spokesperson for Consumer Action, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization. … Read all.
link
Of course, if your housing happens to cost more than that, you are empowered to obtain, at your own expense, less expensive housing, or if that is not available, liberate yourself from housing completely and send your wages directly to the credit card company until your employer discovers that you are living in your car and terminates your employment.
It does not appear from this chart that medical treatment of any kind is considered an allowable expense. I imagine that before passage some provision will be demanded by the insurance companies to allow victims to continue giving them money, but since most bankruptcies occur due to individuals with insufficient income to support lifestyle extravagances such as housing and medical treatment in the first place, the big winner will still be the prison industrial complex.
Do debtors get a choice of either the Federal exemption schedule or their home state’s exemption schedule?
If so, wouldn’t creating state schemes that better protect debtors be a great Dem platform? You could also pull in the real estate lobby because they would hate to see the market flooded with homes as a result of the new B’ruptcy rules.
do me a solid, and try to get back to me today on J-a-P’s latest.
Also, you gotta chime in on this thread on Slacker’s manifesto. I feel like a raving right winger over there.