I can’t count the number of times I’ve use the government’s weather sites. It’s a must for boaters and hikers around here. How about you? Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), introduced a bill last week that would prohibit federal meteorologists from offering free weather information, in competition with companies such as AccuWeather and the Weather Channel which offer their own forecasts through paid services and free ad-supported Web sites. The National Weather Service Web site, for example, would be forced to close down.
Thing is, RAW STORY has discovered, Santorum “has received nearly $4,000 from AccuWeather’s founder and executive vice president since 2000.” More below:
Santorum is not the only one who failed to disclose financial connections; so did the Palm Beach Post newspaper in its story about the legislation:
[Myers] gave $1,000 to Santorum in the last election cycle. Santorum was the only senator Myers financially supported.
AccuWeather’s 15,000 clients include Post, which utilizes the firm’s hurricane forecast maps on PalmBeachPost.com. The Post failed to include mention of Myers contributions.
Myers’ brother, Joel, founder, CEO and president of AccuWeather, has also given generously to Santorum over the years—more than $2,000 in the last election cycle alone. …
In a release Apr. 14, Santorum said the bill was sorely needed.
“With the support of my colleagues, we can pass this legislation to modernize the description of the National Weather Service’s roles within the national weather enterprise, so that it reflects today’s reality in which the National Weather Service and the commercial weather industry both play important parts in providing weather products and services to the nation,” Santorum said.
Sen. Bill Nelson expressed concern:
“The weather service proved so instrumental and popular and helpful in the wake of the hurricanes,” Nelson spokesman Dan McLaughlin told the Post. “How can you make an argument that we should pull it off the Net now? What are you going to do, charge hurricane victims to go online, or give them a pop-up ad?”
Although I feel that this is a stupid idea, for the best coverage use weather underground. It is, by far, the best weather related site.
Thanks for the link. I hadn’t heard of it.
What I don’t get is why Santorum would go to all this trouble for a lousy $4K.
It’s really hard for me to get in the of one of those Republicans…
My first thought Susan is that it’s just the repukes chipping away of federal government info and privatizing everything so CEO’s/big business can make more and more money at our expense.
Seemingly little things like this that get passed before anyone notices and then it’s too late. Although I think this is getting a lot more attention then Santorum thought it would, hope so anyway.
Problem is, Weather Underground seems to use NWS information exclusively. If NWS goes, so does Weather Underground, as well as other online weather services. I had read this already… being a Pennsylvanian, I sort of ‘collect’ Santorum links for later use.
I realize how dumb that sounds, given Santorum’s gross lies, corruption, and general sociopathy. But as the song says, little things mean a lot.
This is the “little” issue that everybody can grasp:
Santorum and the GOP want to take away your free Weather Service forecasts. Their bill will privatize the data so you either have to pay for forecasts or watch ads to see them. Americans have counted on free access to Weather forecasts for more than a century, but the Santorum gang wants to sell you out to their corporate backers. Did you wonder what the Republicans are up to with “privatization”? Now you know. It’s time to take back America.