promoted by BooMan. Thanks to Cicero for making me read it 😉
{The notice featured in this diary comes from a source “on the inside” who is fond of their job and will therefore remain nameless}
A seemingly innocuous memo was released today by the SBA, that essentially clears the way for the Federal government to directly fund the Republican’s Theocratic allies.
For those of you who don’t know the US SBA’s job is to guarantee loans made by banks to small businesses. This means if the business fails, SBA will pay the lender roughly 75% of the remaining value of the loan. The guarantee allows large banks to take otherwise unacceptable risks and fund small and start-up businesses, which are traditionally very poor credit risks.
If it works everybody wins, the economy grow, more people get jobs, the lender makes a profit etc.
So Far so Good.
But my Spidey-sense started tingling today when my source sent me an SBA Information Notice entitled:
SBA Loans Allowed to For-Profit Subsidiaries of Not-For-Profit Organizations, Including Faith-Based Organizations
Seems harmless, but this “clarification” is Big Trouble
While this appears on the surface to be only a technical bulletin clarifying SBA’s rules, the tone and emphasis of the notice make it very clear, what the real message is:
Pursuant to Executive Order 13342, signed by the President on June 1, 2004, the SBA was, among other things, directed to incorporate community organizations, including faith-based organizations, into the Agency’s programs and initiatives to the greatest extent legally possible.
In Washingtonese that meant the President expected SBA to move heaven and earth to twist the syntax of its rules to the maximum extent possible to find a way to fund these groups. And the SBA delivered:
The Agency is now clarifying that for-profit subsidiary companies of community and faith-based organizations may be eligible for SBA financial assistance.
Clarifying is Washington speak for Changing
All SBA borrowers must meet certain eligibility requirements, found in subpart A of 13 CFR Part 120. These regulations prohibit SBA loans to not-for-profit businesses or businesses principally engaged in teaching, instructing, counseling or indoctrinating religion or religious beliefs, whether in a religious or secular setting.
Until now, it was considered inappropriate (not to mention of a violation of the establishment clause of the 1st amendment) for federal funds to go be used to promote or proselytize a single sectarian of religious viewpoint over another.
So while SBA money could be used to fund a bookstore carrying a wide range of books about all religions, it wouldn’t say, fund the book-store inside of a mega-church that only carried copies of it’s pastor’s writings.
Well those quaint standards and rules are gone now. While technically keeping the rule intact they’ve just created a loophole you could fly an Airbus through:
However, for-profit subsidiaries of not-for-profit organizations(including community groups and faith-based organizations)..are eligible for financial assistance.. so long as these subsidiaries are not principally engaged in teaching, instructing, counseling, or indoctrinating religion or religious beliefs. {emphasis original}
In non-lawyer that means that its perfectly fine to engage in “teaching, instructing, counseling, or indoctrinating religion or religious beliefs” just so long as they also create enough of a fig-leaf of “other business”.
It very hard to see this as anything but a well timed plan to fund W’s allies to the tune of several million dollars each. The same people pushing this expansion will be the people allowed to decide what constitutes “principally engaged” and something tells me they’re going to have very lenient standards. What this means is that just as a major media, and public-relations war is brewing; W’s allies can now free up a whole lot of their liquid cash reserves.
Any group such a Focus on the Family that has for-profit subsidiary (such as their publishing house) can now get about a million dollars (SBA loan ceiling) in federally guaranteed loan money) to finance their operations. This will allow them to use the money they raise from their faithful to be spent elsewhere, such as large media buys supporting the president’s agenda.
This is also a very sneaky way for major financial institutions to get around campaign contribution limits. Banks and credit card companies, who owe the Republicans big time for the bankruptcy bill, can now return the favor. All the lender has to do is make loans to the “for profit” shell corporations of staunch Republican religious organizations, under the guise of SBA lending. While they can’t use the loan funds directly to support a candidate, all money is interchangeable, and the organization, will suddenly have a lot more of to use however they see fit.
To make matters worse, the Banks won’t even be donating their own money, they’ll be donating yours and mine. Because SBA guarantees the loans, they have to cover the loss if they are defaulted on . This means when they aren’t paid back, the lender force the SBA (Which means our tax dollars)to pay 75% of the balance, with interest!
The Republiban has said since the election that they would be seeking “payback” from this administration for their support. Who knew they meant it so literally?
This is huge. This should be front paged, absolutely. I knew there was more finagling going on with the Faith Based crowd. Bush thinks the US treasury is his personal checking account. This administration has done a record amount of damage to our system of government in record time. I think we should not only impeach the bastard, we should make him personally pay for the money he’s cost the taxpayers… and force him to work at soup kitchens in the poorest places in the nation for the rest of his life.
Your Spidey sense is tuned and functioning perfectly. Toots to you for a great diary.
For the normal reasons, surely, but also this is very bad for the churches I think.
They’ll (the ones which are seduced into thinking this is a good thing, not the Talibanish ones) will be sorry a decade or so down the road, I believe.
This is so important, and so typical of this bunch!
My transcript notation for distinguished performance in Administrative law.
This is going to be a Bloody mess, and oh, yeah- for-profit subsidiaries of religious organizations are allowed to discriminate on gender and religious grounds.
This will f’ing bankrupt the SBA too, just in time for such funds to be unavailable to the only sector (entreprenuership) that has a chance of salvaging our economy.
Big Business and other monopolists must love this plan too- less cap for the comp!
Just did a little business modelling in my head-
combined with structural tax advantages provided to real property owned by religious organizations churches will be able to use this to take over as much of the low margin business sector (groceries, gas stations, movie theaters, etc.) as they wish.
It would involve subleasing a logically minimal footprint of the commercial structure to the for profit venture and finding a tenable religious use for the rest of the area. Thus a church owned grocery could avoid paying property taxes on its parking lot.
Combine this with tax exemptions for certain employees of relious groups who could then be loaned to the for profit subsidiary- and you have an insurmountable competitive advantage for the for-profit subsidiaries of religious organizations.
Though this, in the end, might contribute to the GOP’s meltdown. Some business sectors might well begin to feel the heat from these megachurch industrial complexes and feel the need to hit back.
If the Fundies love being persecuted now, they’ll be ecstatic about riling up the Chamber of Commerce.
I have been using the term “American Taliban” since we first invaded Afghanistan. Now it has become clear, unfortunately, how pernicious they have become.
This report by the Rockefeller Center for Religion & Social Policy lays out the current state of the law as of the end of ’04. In their analysis of current cases, broad-based challenges to faith-based programs failed because the “enabling” document was not legislation enacted by congress. Meaning Plaintiff’s had no “standing” to sue. But they could go after one program at a time.
Stopping this train means pulling FBCI funding from the budget. What’re the odds on that one? Checkmate. Hiding in plain sight.
= = = = = = =
SBA FBCI Website with this Factsheet (.pdf):
* SBA’s 68 district offices sent a letter from the Administrator to more than 25,000 faith-based and community groups inviting them to participate in SBA programs geared to their specific needs. The offices also held over 150 workshops for faith-based and other community organizations. [21 March 2005]
And from a speech given at the FBCI Leadership Conference by Dubya himself on 3 March: