Reporter, Peter Maass, has a very interesting article in today’s New York Times Magazine:
General Adnan, as he is known, is the leader of Iraq’s most fearsome counterinsurgency force. It is called the Special Police Commandos and consists of about 5,000 troops. They have fought the insurgents in Mosul, Ramadi, Baghdad and Samarra. It was in Samarra, 60 miles north of Baghdad in the heart of the Sunni Triangle, where, in early March, I spent a week with Adnan, himself a Sunni, and two battalions of his commandos.
The article gets into a lot of detail about how the U.S. military and men like General Adnan are fighting the ‘counterinsurgency’. It does a good job of exploring the moral ambiguity of putting down the Iraqi resistance. But, what interested me is Baass’s reporting on the new hit television program, Terrorism in the Grip of Justice.
Those being interrogated on the program do not look fearsome; these are not the faces to be found in the propaganda videos that turn up on Web sites or on Al Jazeera. The insurgents, or suspected insurgents, on “Terrorism in the Grip of Justice” come off as cowardly lowlifes who kill for money rather than patriotism or Allah. They tremble on camera, stumble over their words and look at the ground as they confess to everything from contract murders to sodomy. The program’s clear message is that there is now a force more powerful than the insurgency: the Iraqi government, and in particular the commandos, whose regimental flag, which shows a lion’s head on a camouflage background, is frequently displayed on a banner behind the captives.
Apparently, the show is considered effective and useful propaganda. And perhaps it is effective and useful. The problem is that it is in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions.
Al-Iraqiya is an American funded televison network. So, we’re paying for these human rights abuses. But, it’s interesting to see how some Iraqis justify the tactics and the program:
“There is no way that you can complain about human rights for these people–they are traitors,” said Alaa al-Saffar, an Iraqi journalist, offering a view so common that many Iraqis express bafflement that the treatment of the suspects might be considered unfair. “This is not like your country. This situation is so bad here. This is what we need to do.”
Chicago Tribune
Nothing is simple in Mess O’ Potamia. But, if the Iraqis want to violate their own human rights, I would prefer they do it on a non-American taxpayer subsidized network.
All this after billions of dollars and thousands of lives lost.
And yet, who has got the answers for a peaceful Iraq?
It’s a difficult question to answer. There is a reason that Saddam ruled with such a heavy hand. And as bad as it was for those who got caught in his sadistic net, it was also safe to walk to school, or stay out after dark, or drive to the airport.
I don’t think we can get hysterical over every incident of human rights violations by the new government. But we don’t have to pay for it. That’s my point.
We’ve already paid for a lot of human rights violations. No mas.
should come under international organizations, like the UN for example, with support from the USA.
Hmmm, this is giving me deja vu, like back in early 2003, didn’t I hear something like this from 10 million people protesting the invasion of Iraq.
Iraq and its human rights problems should never have become the sole responsibility of the US, of course.
The fact that all this time, money and lives have been wasted, if a new tyranny is established in Iraq, just solidifies the abject failure of the Bush administration.
“How do I hate thee, [Bush administration] let me count the ways…”
Interesting take on the subject. I’d read some articles on this-the best was on GNN-Guerrilla News Network- republished from Direland. You might want to check it out if you haven’t already.One quote:
It seems the gay terror element travels well…
(wow, the blockquote worked? thanks again to superscalar)
Yeah, I didn’t even touch the extreme anti-gay nature of the show.
But the whole point is to humiliate the captives and make them seem un-heroic and ridiculous.
Since there is such a strong taboo on homosexuality in Iraqi culture, I imagine this tactic is very effective.
It doesn’t make it right.
Complete agreement there, I just find it ironic and sad that homophobia once again plays well with the public. Wrong is a given.
it is sad.
I can imagine the beatings they are giving out to get people to ‘admit’ having homosexual relations in a mosque.
And they are using our money for this.
And they think it is a smashing success.
Fucked up from every angle.
Then again, sheeple need to see these things, don’t they?
Remember, if you saw it on TV, it’s real.
who are reading: is Peter Maass correct in referring to the program being a breach of the Geneva Conventions. Do the Geneva Conventions relate to the conduct of domestic wars against insurgency as opposed to wars between states?
If the Conventions apply to a domestic armed conflict, where is the line drawn between a conflict where the Conventions apply and, say, the police cleaning up armed criminals (presumably that is what the Iraqi Government would say it is doing).
I hasten to add that this is just an academic question about the Geneva Conventions and not an excuse for Adnan – what is being done on the program is morally wrong and presumably breaches Iraqi law as well as international human rights obligations.
and I think the Iraqi government is not guilty of violating the Geneva Conventions. But we are the occupying power, and it is our television station. So, we are really testing the Geneva Conventions by airing the programs.
Our argument would be that we are not the one’s doing the torture and abuse, etc.
But I doubt that’s even true. And even if it were true, it would still be of dubious legality.
And the program clearly violates other human rights treaties.
Jeez and didn’t we use to laud the SAVIK for maintaining law and order? Holy crow!
I’m starting to understand why Bush 1 didn’t want to remove Saddam… because as bad as he was, things are even worse with “us” there. Now that’s saying something!
Pax