Okay, I do it. I came across this story and it just doesn’t let me go. But it will be another one of my stories thrown together in a hurry. Some of this I posted already on the open thread. So first a big SORRY for the stile.
I came across this story on the Website called Free Iraq and originally was in Arabic. The story is called:
“Combat terrorism” by causing it.
“A few days ago, an American manned check point confiscated the driver license of a driver and told him to report to an American military camp near Baghdad airport for interrogation and in order to retrieve his license. The next day, the driver did visit the camp and he was allowed in the camp with his car. He was admitted to a room for an interrogation that lasted half an hour. At the end of the session, the American interrogator told him: `OK, there is nothing against you, but you do know that Iraq is now sovereign and is in charge of its own affairs. Hence, we have forwarded your papers and license to al-Kadhimia police station for processing. Therefore, go there with this clearance to reclaim your license. At the police station, ask for Lt. Hussain Mohammed who is waiting for you now. Go there now quickly, before he leaves his shift work”.
The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors.The only feasible explanation for this incidence is that the car was indeed booby trapped by the Americans and intended for the al-Khadimiya Shiite district of Baghdad. The helicopter was monitoring his movement and witnessing the anticipated “hideous attack by foreign elements”.
The same scenario was repeated in Mosul, in the north of Iraq. A car was confiscated along with the driver’s license. He did follow up on the matter and finally reclaimed his car but was told to go to a police station to reclaim his license. Fortunately for him, the car broke down on the way to the police station. The inspecting car mechanic discovered that the spare tire was fully laden with explosives.”
Then when I posted this at MoA and b responded with this link: `The Salvador Option. Remember this was a big Newsweek story in January. So this brings Negroponte and Co. to mind, doesn’t it?
Now, NEWSWEEK has learned, the Pentagon is intensively debating an option that dates back to a still-secret strategy in the Reagan administration’s battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s. Then, faced with a losing war against Salvadoran rebels, the U.S. government funded or supported “nationalist” forces that allegedly included so-called death squads directed to hunt down and kill rebel leaders and sympathizers. Eventually the insurgency was quelled, and many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success–despite the deaths of innocent civilians and the subsequent Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal. (Among the current administration officials who dealt with Central America back then is John Negroponte, who is today the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. Under Reagan, he was ambassador to Honduras. There is no evidence, however, that Negroponte knew anything about the Salvadoran death squads or the Iran-Contra scandal at the time. The Iraq ambassador, in a phone call to NEWSWEEK on Jan. 10, said he was not involved in military strategy in Iraq. He called the insertion of his name into this report “utterly gratuitous.”)
Following that model, one Pentagon proposal would send Special Forces teams to advise, support and possibly train Iraqi squads, most likely hand-picked Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shiite militiamen, to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, even across the border into Syria, according to military insiders familiar with the discussions. It remains unclear, however, whether this would be a policy of assassination or so-called “snatch” operations, in which the targets are sent to secret facilities for interrogation. The current thinking is that while U.S. Special Forces would lead operations in, say, Syria, activities inside Iraq itself would be carried out by Iraqi paramilitaries, officials tell NEWSWEEK.
Something in me hopes that this all not true. But considering all what has happened, I tend towards believing it.
P.S. Thanks Cabingirl for the push.
Update [2005-5-17 14:20:58 by Fran]: Riverbend has a new post, fitting this topic.The Dead and the Undead…
I didn’t think much about the story- nothing about it stood out: an explosion and a sniper- hardly an anomaly. The interesting news started circulating a couple of days later. People from the area claim that the man was taken away not because he shot anyone, but because he knew too much about the bomb. Rumor has it that he saw an American patrol passing through the area and pausing at the bomb site minutes before the explosion. Soon after they drove away, the bomb went off and chaos ensued. He ran out of his house screaming to the neighbors and bystanders that the Americans had either planted the bomb or seen the bomb and done nothing about it. He was promptly taken away.The bombs are mysterious. Some of them explode in the midst of National Guard and near American troops or Iraqi Police and others explode near mosques, churches, and shops or in the middle of sougs. One thing that surprises us about the news reports of these bombs is that they are inevitably linked to suicide bombers. The reality is that some of these bombs are not suicide bombs- they are car bombs that are either being remotely detonated or maybe time bombs. All we know is that the techniques differ and apparently so do the intentions. Some will tell you they are resistance. Some say Chalabi and his thugs are responsible for a number of them. Others blame Iran and the SCIRI militia Badir.
I read about those explosions through remote control before (but just can not remember where). Wonder if we ever find out what is really going on.
on dailykos. It is my first diary there and I would appreciate your support through a recommendation there.
I’m happy to give you my reccomendation.
Well, the diary didn’t get far on dKos, this has been a wild weekend, full of new topics. So many of them important, its hard to keep up with all of them.
.
One of my favorite articles, situated in El Salvador 1979-80, 25 years ago. It could have been written today on the identical military and foreign policy of the Bush | Cheney | Rumsfeld administration.
By Margaret O’Brien Steinfels – Commonweal
Reagan’s election was greeted with noisy enthusiasm among
Salvador’s oligarchs, parties and gun bursts celebrated the man,
who would save them not only from revolution, but from reform
and from ambassador Robert White as well.
Shortly after arriving in El Salvador in early March, Ambassador White had paid Bishop Romero a visit. The ambassador arrived in an armored limousine accompanied by an advance car and a chase car. “After we had talked for half an hour, the archbishop said, ‘Well ambassador, why don’t you just come ride with me.’ He’s got this Volkswagen, and said ‘God will protect us.’ I asked, ‘What if he is only protecting you?'”
“So, we joked about that,” recalls White, but he had a serious purpose in visiting Romero.
Transition period Carter-Reagan
Reagan’s conservative allies and appointees conjured up the threat of Soviet subversion with El Salvador and Nicaragua on the front lines. Visits from members of the Reagan transition team to El Salvador gave the elite and the military reason to understand that concern for human rights was being downgraded in favor of wiping out the Communists.
As soon as Secretary of State Alexander Haig took office at the end of January 1981, he announced, “international terrorism will take the place of human rights,” as the priority of U.S. foreign policy.
In six weeks, the Salvadoran military had wiped out center-left politics, crippled the land-reform program, and had given notice that American missionaries and reformers – even those with CIA connections – were not exempt from the tribunal of the death squads.
“If you’ve got a Pentagon that’s overfunded, and you’ve got a CIA that’s overfunded and the State Department is underfunded, AID has practically no money, then you’re going to get policies that emphasize the wrong things for a democracy to emphasize.”
Oui – Liberté – Egalité – Fraternité
Looks like history repeating itself again and again. Sometime I am on the verge of loosing hope for humanity, they just do not seem to learn much. Maybe the Fundamentalists are right, there is no evolution (sorry I am ranting).
.
The Nixon era bred politicians are ageing, will retire, die and return to earth’s dust. Someone please confirm that their spirits will not dwell much longer.
Let’s be optimistic the cold war policies will soon cease, and human rights and the environment are restored as peoples issues and reinstated in governance of US administration policy.
Oui – Liberté – Egalité – Fraternité
Oui,
It is my solemn duty to inform you that Bushco, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfwitz, Ashcroft, Gonzalez, Rove, McClellan and the other slime ball neocon fascist pond scum bacteria eating warmongering, hateful human rights eliminating twitter wits, will come back as ameoba’s as that is all they have been in this life. I firmly believe that karma will prevail, and they all will have to start over again from scratch, because they were defacating and eating out of the same orifice. I am so glad that Great Spirit has such a wonderful sense of humour. I only wish that Great Spirit will allow me to watch them being transformed into their real embodiment. lol
Nice diary Fran, sorry I missed it before.
The scariest part is that this sounds all too plausible these days.
Good job! I’ve been thinking about this a lot since you first brought it up, and it seems more and more plausible as time goes on. Inciting a civil war in Iraq would give the US the excuse they need to stay theree to maintain security, and by targeting the police, they prevent there being any Iraqi forces ready to take the reins of their own security.