I searched for this in the diaries and stories but found nothing. If this has already been diaried. let me know and I will delete this.
Paul Craig Roberts, a well known and well respected conservative journalist and former Assistant Treasury Secretary under Reagan, has called for the impeachment and conviction of George W. Bush.
George W. Bush and his gang of neocon warmongers have destroyed America’s reputation. It is likely to stay destroyed, because at this point the only way to restore America’s reputation would be to impeach and convict President Bush for intentionally deceiving Congress and the American people in order to start a war of aggression against a country that posed no threat to the United States.
America can redeem itself only by holding Bush accountable.
More across the bump…
[snip]
Abundant evidence now exists in the public domain to convict George W. Bush of the crime of the century. The secret British government memo (dated July 23, 2002, and available here), leaked to the Sunday Times (which printed it on May 1, 2005), reports that Bush wanted “to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. . . . But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. . . . The (United Kingdom) attorney general said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defense, humanitarian intervention or UNSC (U.N. Security Council) authorization. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult.”
This memo is the mother of all smoking guns. Why isn’t Bush in the dock?
Has American democracy failed at home?
Roberts has been one of the most vocal conservative critics of the Bush administration. What are Roberts bonifieds, you ask? From his Bio on his homepage:
Roberts was a distinguished fellow at the Cato Institute from 1993 to 1996. From 1982 through 1993, he held the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. During 1981-82, he served as assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy. President Ronald Reagan and Treasury secretary Donald Regan credited him with a major role in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, and he was awarded the Treasury Department’s Meritorious Service Award for “his outstanding contributions to the formulation of United States economic policy.” From 1975 to 1978, Roberts served on the congressional staff, where he drafted the Kemp-Roth bill and played a leading role in developing bipartisan support for a supply-side economic policy.
As we know from the excellent “Confessions of a Former Dittohead” diaries by advisorjim (at Daily Kos), one of the only ways to get through to the indoctrinated is to show them critiques by trusted sources. Paul Craig Roberts is one of those genuine conservatives who thinks the Bush administration has been a disaster. Show his articles to all your neo-conned friends.
Wow – you found a real humdinger here!
Thanks for bringing it here. I look forward to a Guzman plethora of comments;-)
This really is one out of the blue.
As Welshman has often mentioned, there has to be a straw that breaks the chimp’s back. It doesn’t matter which straw it is: we are beginning to see the sag.
It maybe your straw…
are literally being knocked out of the stuffing of this corporate-plutocratic straw-man… we just need to keep it up…
Now there is a brilliant image twist! LOL
Break the chimp’s back by pulling out his stuffing bit by bit.
He is an effigy.
This guy used to be one of the darlings of the Right, until he had the temerity to question the Iraq invasion. I used to read him on the Town Hall site (when I was more into caring what the wingers were saying). Then he wrote an editorial in the Washington Times (which Town Hall refused to print, lol) and whew! He was astounded at the vitriolic emails and death threats and stuff he got.
That seems to be the pattern with people who stray from the approved line… for some reason, they believe they have a right to do that, and that others on the right will just have a debate about the issue. Then they get a real quick lesson in who their readers/supporters etc, actually are… and either fall back into line quickly, or become ostracized, like this guy.
Hope he has good security, after this article.
I’ve been wondering how the real conservatives were ever going to speak after nearly severing that ability while biting their tongues so long …
Blood and money pour into the sand every day … should not we all speak out against it every day?
Here’s the Sunday Times original secret memo story.
And verbal hellfire, damnation, and a surprising amount of support in the comments on Paul Craig Roberts’ web site.
Had Bush put the same amount of troops and money into Afghanistan, would we not by now have captured Osama Bin Laden, the real criminal of 9/11?