Laura Bush, that is. “First lady Laura Bush on Monday endorsed Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak’s plan for presidential elections as ‘bold and wise,’ reports the AP/NYT, “despite complaints from opposition groups that the voting is designed to keep Mubarak in power.” Mrs. Bush reiterated “support for Mubarak’s election plan” Tuesday, reports WaPo today.
Ayman Nour, the sole opposition candidate, criticized Mrs. Bush: “It shows she doesn’t understand anything at all. She made a statement that suggests she doesn’t know she was in Egypt. It was comical.”
The campaign of the sole opposition candidate was reduced to this Tuesday:
But the ruse at the movie theatre didn’t work:
The WaPo report continues:
Five of the plainclothes men dragged Ihab Khouly, a senior member of Nour’s Tomorrow Party, to jail for a brief stay. Nour’s wife, Gamila Ismael, was manhandled, though she was soon permitted to return to nearby party headquarters.
“The Odeon Theater fracas, reports the WaPo, “came a day after first lady Laura Bush, on a trip to the Middle East, endorsed Mubarak’s election proposals.”
Members of parties and organizations that have protested Mubarak’s proposed election rules have suffered almost daily arrests and police raids. By official count, more than 750 members of the Muslim Brotherhood have been rounded up during the past two months. Although it is banned from political activity, the Brotherhood is Egypt’s largest opposition group. On Tuesday, 19 members of Kifaya, a movement that has spearheaded peaceful protests since last fall, were arrested for putting up anti-Mubarak posters.
In another WaPo story today on Laura Bush’s Mid-East whirlwind tour:
In the interview, Bush reiterated her support for Mubarak’s election plan, which would require candidates for office to secure the blessing of the president’s ruling party to participate. A vote on a referendum on the plan is expected Wednesday. “I said exactly what I meant, which is he has taken a very, very important first step,” she said. “What we all have to see is whether or not this works.”
“‘What kind of presidential campaign can we have if we have to organize in secret?’ Ismael asked as the police began to corral the group inside the Odeon”:
Under emergency laws in place for almost 25 years, police can break up any gathering of more than five people. In a March speech, President Bush included the right of assembly as a prerequisite for a fair election in Egypt. Abdel Halim Qandeel, a founding member of Kifaya, which means “enough,” said: “The Bushes are something like the Mubaraks. Full of lies.”
Hey, we’d like “freedom of assembly” too. Anti-Bush protestors in the U.S. are now routinely corralled and distanced in the U.S.
Note: Thanks to Jerry for sending me some of these stories.
Katie on the Today show two days ago asked The Stepford Wife about the protestors that showed up against her. Laura darling’s reply was “We were not surprise but there was only one or two people doing that”. Take the rose colored glasses off Mrs. Robot. There were at least 50 to 100 protestors if not more. Secret service and security personal had to “lock arms” in order to hold them back. How can this woman endorse elections that do not include women? Yeppers, she is sure repairing our image over there isn’t she?
Tell us more about the restrictions on women. Egyptian women have the right to vote, no?
P.S. Did you see that Kuwaiti women have secured the right to vote — finally?
Susan, you are absolutely right about Egyptian women. They did get the right to vote in I believe March 1956. I was thinking of the Saudi women. I jumped way ahead of myself here.
Next Mubarak will be holding “town hall meetings” with pre-entry obedience training.
It’d be comical if we didn’t have to live with her. On the other hand, storyteller Joel bin Izzy said one of the most important things his father taught him boiled down to, “Anyone can laugh at things that are funny. It takes a special person to laugh when things aren’t funny.”
very limited, sympathy for Laura Bush in this case.
It is not her job to go abroad and speak truth to power. It’s her job to say little niceties, and to encourage whatever limited reform is going on.
Our relationship with Egypt is long and complicated, and it probably shouldn’t be our big priority, right now, to stir things up about this election.
At the same time, we need to recognize that our policies do not make us popular with Egyptians. And we need to change our policies wisely and prudently. These sham elections could be a flawed step in the right direction. But they must be followed up by more and more openness.
Can anyone tell me about the opponent in this election? Would he be someone that would break off relations with us and cause a crisis in US-Egyptian relations? Or is he hand-picked to be puppet number two?
Considering that many Republicans feel that somehow it was “treasonous” for Bush to be opposed in an election, or that there be an opposition party at all, it wouldn’t be beyond the realm of belief that Mrs. Bush meant exactly what she said.