I assume this audience is old enough to remember the Smurfs – little blue humanoids who at one time inhabited Saturday morning teevee? Like the Seven Dwarfs, the Smurfs had a simplified version of individuality such that each had one personal characteristic that pretty much determined how that dude acted (e.g., Brainy, Jokey, Grouchy — hmmm, sounds like a blog). The entire species apparently included only one female, named Smurfette, whose defining personality characteristic was …Female. Unique she was, but not what I’d call a developed person, even for a Smurf. Her identity was her gender, and her claim to fame lay in being Other.
Apparently like many women of (ahem) a certain age, my reaction to Kos’ diatribe was a series of unpleasant flashbacks to times when I was a Smurfette. That is, times when the only thing that seemed to matter in an interaction was my gender, and my gender mattered because it meant I could be discounted. Not a person with thoughts, opinions, desires to be given equal weight to those of the real Smurfs.
It isn’t the stupid ad, it’s the willingness to bargain away my reproductive rights to achieve “more important” political ends. It’s not Ginger’s faux cleavage, it’s the assertion that discomfort over women being infantilized is not germane to a political discussion. It’s deep deep weariness on hearing the message, again, that women’s concerns are separate and not equal, and should be put on hold until we win the really important wars. Hey, I heard that garbage in the Seventies, from the young hotshot supposedly progressive Smurfs of the time. They may have been reincarnated and are now living at Dkos, but I can tell you that my career as Smurfette is definitely over. If you don’t see me as more than merely Female, then you won’t see me, because I’ll be gone.
So true. Smurfette didn’t even get a real name. At least Papa Smurf was the dad. Smurfette was just an “ette.”
I’m with you, sister.
Old enough to remember – funny, now that I think about it, I identified with Brainy, and had a visceral hatred toward Smurfette. Unfortunately, that wasn’t enough to prevent me from doing a couple of years a la bimbo.
Thanks for this diary – I’ve sworn to just move on, but keep coming back to this in spite of myself. I guess we’ve all got some venting and healing to do.
And I think we have our frame. They object to being called misogynists? Fine. It’s now the “Smurfette Factor”. Let’s see how they like having their opinions trivialized for a change. (No, I’m not serious – this would be a really crappy frame in general. But it’s a fun idea, no?)
Though to be fair, none of the other stereotypes are particularly good either. I’ve always been Brainy, and have had to hammer through God-knows-how-many “book smarts”s because of that. (“You can’t write fiction, you’ve got book smarts!” “You can’t be good with people, you’ve got book smarts!” “Oh, your philosophy may sound good, but it’s just book smarts! It doesn’t work in reality!” ad infinitum)
The problem is that stereotypes are a very useful way of categorizing information about people, which tends to be very complex. And, to make things worse, they’re really good for identifying characters in fiction. Almost every memorable literary character I can think of is memorable because they’re “stereotype but”s or “stereotype with”s. And this just reinforces the stereotyping.
I think the solution is to recognize when you’re stereotyping and try to minimize it’s influence on your perceptions.
And don’t forget what may be the most important fact about Smurfette — sociologically speaking — besides the overwhelming gender imbalance. Smurfette was created by Gargamel to destroy the male smurfs.
Here’s the short version of the creation story:
Here’s the long version of the Smurfette creation story, that shows just how applicable — and truly awful — it is. Warning: prepare to be aghast at what you’re about to read:
How’d you like that? Yes indeed, Smurfette is precisely the right allusion. I don’t want to do a diary on it, but I’d say there’s a lot of potential there…
Oooh — I didn’t know that! What a weird inversion of the Garden of Eden story (which itself keeps cropping up disguised as political memes these days). This time it’s Satan who is the Creator, and Eve is sent deliberately to destroy Eden. Kindly old God intervenes to make things all hunky dory by turning Eve into Stepford Smrfette, sort of like eating the fruit of knowledge in reverese. Well, I guess you need happy endings for kids’ stories.
Dang it smith, that is a really good analogy, and a very good post of your points. We are glad to have you here.
Welcome!
By the way, the original cartoon was french-belgian (Peyo, Spirou journal, 1958)and their name was: “les Schtroumpfs”
And the Smurfette was “la Schtroumpfette”
The diarists last paragraph is an excellent explanation of why The Ad is not the issue. There are larger gender-based political flare ups “Daily…”