This is BooMan’s bailiwick (geographically and otherwise), but Laura Rozen’s post at War & Piece — about Rep. Curt Weldon, who’s campaigning to chair the House Homeland Security Committee (he’s currently vice-chair) — intrigued me:
And who can’t help but be even more intrigued when they read the following from the Washington Post:
- hiding Osama bin Laden
- is preparing terrorist attacks against the United States
- has a crash program to build an atomic bomb and
- as a Shiite country, is the chief sponsor of what is a largely Sunni-directed insurgency in Iraq.
The WaPo copy editor must have howled his head off over that blowgun lead.
So, where Laura Rozen at War & Piece defends the CIA, Weldon condemns it.
And, in her article for The Prospect, Ms. Rosen further exposes Weldon’s turgid fantasies:
Here’s what the WaPo says about “Ali”:
Switch Iran for Iraq, and Gorbanifar for Ahmed Chalabi — an Iraqi exile whose claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction were distrusted by the CIA but were embraced by the Defense Department and the White House — and Weldon’s book reads like the conservative argument for the invasion of Iraq.
Most fascinating yet, Ms. Rozen has unmasked the mysterious “Ali”:
Mahdavi also said that the bulk of the information … was originally sourced from none other than Ghorbanifar, the subject of a rare CIA “burn notice” after the agency found him to be a “fabricator” more than two decades ago during the Iran-Contra affair.
“Many information that I have given to Weldon is coming from Ghorbanifar,” said Mahdavi. … “Because Ghorbanifar used me, in fact, to pass that stuff because I know he has problems in Washington.”
[……………….]
Several Iranian exile associates … have told the Prospect that Mahdavi, living in reduced circumstances … is in fact financially dependent on Ghorbanifar. They have been involved in various businesses together, from petroleum shipping to arms dealing to (more recently) intelligence peddling, since both washed up in Paris after the Iranian revolution in 1979.
“Although Mahdavi expresses understanding of the motives of his old pal and business partner Ghorbanifar,” reports Ms. Rozen, “he says he is utterly baffled by Weldon’s decision to use his information as the foundation of a book that the congressman never once mentioned to him”:
[A]fter receiving a fax with a Congressional Quarterly article about Weldon’s forthcoming book and the amazon.com book description, Mahdavi spoke again in shock and anger.
“Someone is using me for their purposes,” he raged. “How is it possible that something like that book comes out and the people who publish it don’t inform me? … [I]f you had not called me and told me there is a book coming out from Weldon, I would have never known about it. … I am sure, there is a fight between all these [U.S. government] organizations, and they are using this issue and using me.”
“Among those who agree,” says Ms. Rozen, “is the former senior CIA official who met with Mahdavi in response to Weldon’s pressure on the agency to accept the Mahdavi/Ghorbanifar information. The tale of ‘Ali’ suggests that the agency is assiduously seeking to weed out another fabricator like Ghorbanifar (or Iraqi fabulist Ahmad Chalabi) from corrupting U.S. intelligence information on Iran.”