How does one write about the history of the U.S. intelligence services without sounding like you either hate America, or you are a paranoid lunatic? One thing that you can rely on about Americans is that we like to feel good about ourselves; we like to feel virtuous. And, in a lot of ways, we are virtuous. We’re generous, confident, idealistic, and justifiably proud of many of our accomplishments as a nation.
We believe in our own myths, not so much because we hold them to be truths, but because we believe the myths are the right myths to have. Our aspirations for a just society may never be perfectly met, but by valuing the ideals of the Founding Fathers we further the cause of approaching those ideals. Our country may be overrun by dangerous wingnuts at the moment but, to a great extent, even the wingnuts share this progressive optimism. Even for the neo-cons, if we allow ourselves to ascribe any sincerity whatsoever to their delusional grand-plans, the belief that reality will succumb to good intentions and high ideals is strong. This uniquely American mindset is simultaneously responsible for our unique place in the world (it works), and responsible for our greatest blunders (it has a big downside).
Simply put, we want to believe in our unique virtue, courage, and exemplary history. We slew the dragons of fascism and communism. We shone light on a world half-shrouded in darkness. And, while we can debate how much of the credit for the defeat of fascism and communism is truly due to America’s contributions, we can’t dispute the critical role that our nation played in their defeat.
We also cannot dispute the unique contribution our Founding Fathers made in laying out principles that are nearly universally respected, and increasingly enshrined in international law. Our nation’s imperfect effort to live out those ideals has been a shining example that those ideals are workable, desirable, and approachable.
So, we’re proud.
And proud people frequently suffer from hubris. Proud people have a hard time facing up to their own shortcomings. We’ve been through this before. We went through it in the late 60’s and early 70’s. In Vietnam we met a reality that would not bend to our will. In Watergate, we learned that our government was capable of falling far short of our own pollyannaish self-image. But it was the Church and Pike Committees that most clearly showed the nefarious underbelly of American power.
This was a period in American history when the public was outraged at revelations that shattered our myths about our own unique virtue. The experience was an anguish for many, but it also was exhilarating and liberating to learn the secrets unearthed by the Pentagon Papers, the Watergate investigation, the ensuing Congressional inquiries, and the dismal end to the war in Vietnam. But this date with introspection was brief, and it was CBS reporter Daniel Schorr who stood at the crossroads where the pendulum began to swing back to self-congratulatory self-worship. Schorr received and leaked a classified annex of the Pike report to the Village Voice. And he was immediately assaulted by the Establishment and abandoned by his erstwhile friends in the press. Even before the leak, a Harris poll from December 1975 had indicated more respondents disapproved of the Church and Pike Committees than approved of them. The country had had enough of airing our dirty laundry. The election of Reagan in 1980 was, in some sense, an investment in forgetting the recent past in order to believe in America again.
Perhaps this is understandable. But something critical was lost; something crucial was papered over. And that something was the idea that the government must be accountable to the people, and that the Executive must submit to the oversight and powers of both the Congress and the judiciary. We forgot not only what the CIA had done in its, then, thirty-year history, but much more importantly, why they had done it. We forgot whose interests they had been serving. And now the chickens have come home to roost.
The Downing Street Leaks have revealed an almost unimaginable conspiracy to defraud the American people, the British people, and the people of the world. As we begin to dig into this history, we will discover that members of the press were working for our intelligence agencies, helping to fix the facts around the policy. And we’ll resist believing it. But we wouldn’t be shocked if we remembered the revelations of the Church and Pike commissions. We wouldn’t be shocked if we had paid closer attention during the Clinton era.
What many don’t realize as we battle to prevent the right-wing from erasing the reforms of the sixties, is that we have already lost the battle over the reforms of the seventies. The United Fruit of yesteryear is the Halliburton of today, but the abuse of power is the same.
The pendulum is slowly swinging back, and the backlash will be terrible. America’s attention span and patience for self-recrimination will be brief. But soon there will be hell to pay. As an American, believing this is my own brand of virtue, optimism, and hubris.
If only this had happened a year ago….
the backlash will be terrible
Indeed. And we need to articulate a vision that will help to channel that anger. I know damn well a lot of Rovean assholes will working like sleepless zombies to jui-jitsu it back in their favor, via ‘stab in the back’ or some subtler twist. Things are going to get a bit messy.
I’m gonna cite Stirling on this and go to bed. Thanks, Booman. You’re lit tonight.
The flip side of this is the need to find a positive rhetoric. The reactionaries have their vision of a take no shit, take no prisoners, god fearing disciplined society. The kind of America that has a super bowl winning military that everyone cheers, and plenty of free beer. It is a simple vision of America that appeals to experiences in popular culture and personal daily life. The left does not have a corresponding vision of America, and therefore it is difficult for it to promote its own ideas, and even more difficult for it to attack the crass “shit kicker” America that cheers on torture in Guantanamo Bay from the cover of Time Magazine.
The time to do this is running out. America is going to want answers soon, and if it cannot find them from the Democrats, it will find them in some right leaning supposed maverick, such as John McCain. Someone who will tell America that a few reforms around the edges will solve everything, and the only thing we really need to do is get those boots resoled.
n/t
ABSOLUTELY!
and I hope that you are right ( remind me to write a diary :))
But I deeply feer otherwise – just my private paranoid, perhaps.
You see, there is one section of our country which has NEVER believed in the principles of our founding fathers.
They have a very profound belief in might makes right and the majority rules, and a total disdain for the concepts of individual rights and seperation of church and state.
Yes – I am talking about the “South” – and no, I am NOT exagerating.
I grew up in the South, but I know that to many who did not there is disbelief as to how different the Southern culture is.
My personal belief is that the Republican southern strategy has allowed the south to capture the party, and that southern culture, as such, has been successful in spreding far beyond it’s borders.
The upshot is that we are no longer living in the USA we used to know – we are a blended society and are approaching living in the Confederate States of America.
That doesn’t bode well for a backlash.
But I hope I am wrong.
The question is, Is it possible to be an empire and yet behave ethically?
Let’s try an analogy.
You work in a subsidiary of a very large corporation. More and more dissatisfied with the parent company, you and your co-workers decide to break away and make your subsidiary an independent company.
The early years are predictably difficult, but you navigate the problems, and the company prospers. As expansion continues, a major division arises between two factions, but after a very difficult struggle the dissenting faction is persuaded to remain. The company continues to grow, until its power begins to rival, and then to surpass, that of the parent company.
At a certain point, your fledgling company becomes one of two major players in the world market. It’s a bitter struggle, and to compete your company is forced to adopt many of the underhanded methods of its rival. In the end, you win, and your company gains a worldwide monopoly.
Upon reflection, however, you realize that the little business you started so long ago now resembles, more than anything else, the arrogant, bloated, ruthless parent company that you so disliked being a part of. Consumers are ripped off. Suppliers are squeezed and bullied. Potential rivals are bought out, or snuffed out. You don’t like what you see.
Voila! The history of the United States.
Is it possible for a corporation to remain profitable while behaving ethically? Of course it is. Why, then, can a nation, even the only remaining “superpower”, not do the same?
The US government, unfortunately, behaves like a corporation fixated on the next quarter’s profits instead of the company’s long-term viability. Why, 35 years after the first Earth Day, are we still addicted to foreign oil? We are the leading consumers of energy; we should also be the leading innovators in developing self-sustaining, environmentally benign sources of energy.
I dream of an America that is engaged with the world in positive ways: on human rights, on climate change, on economic justice, on energy and the environment. It doesn’t take much imagination to see what the US could do if it chose to behave like an enlightened corporate citizen, instead of a greedy monopoly intent on getting its own way and pursuing short-term profits, driving itself blindly into oblivion.
That’s the real struggle, as I see it. But I am not at all hopeful.
metaphor.
And yet, we haven’t thrown off our beliefs as a people and rushed to embrace monarchy, or some charismatic leader, or some hack-brained philosophy posing as an economic theory. We’ve done some truly awful things in our ‘competition’, many of them totally unnecessary. But we’ve also done good.
Our people are better than our leaders, and have been for quite some time.
First, we haven’t completely abandoned democracy, but . . .
some charismatic leader Ronald Reagan
some hack-brained philosophy posing as an economic theory Milton Friedman
And when you say,
Our people are better than our leaders, and have been for quite some time
I really, really, wonder. It’s convenient to think the people more virtuous than their leaders, but where’s the evidence? In the ’80s anyone who cared could discover that Reagan was promoting murder and subversion all over Latin America. Very few Americans cared. And today, how many care that we are torturing prisoners and detaining people without any due process?
The sad fact is that most of the people who voted for George Bush agree with him that to protect ourselves the torture–oh, sorry, ‘aggressive interrogation’–of ‘terrorists’ is necessary. And the vast majority of Americans simply don’t want to know that we are sending prisoners to our less squeamish allies for the Full Meal Deal of torture.
What’s the evidence that as a people Americans are better than their leaders?
Tin Woodsman: Help! Help!
Scarecrow: It’s no use screaming at a time like this. Nobody will hear you. Help! Help!
The published information on the plan to invade Iraq seems to point to a conspiracy to defraud the American people. But is it enough to move Congress to assign a special prosecutor when both houses are controlled by Republicans? With the media engaged in a conspiracy of silence and misdirection, our elected representatives remain our last, best hope. The only question is whether they will act honorably, and in the best interests of the country.
Guardian of the Emerald City Gates: The wizard? But nobody can see the great Oz, nobody’s ever seen the great Oz… even I’ve never seen him!
Dorothy: Well then, how do you know there is one?
Great essay and one I don’t think you’d have been able to write a year ago. There is now some hope that bushco might just come crashing down.
The American myth lives in people’s hearts and minds…in a way this is good and in many ways it is not, as this blinds people to the reality and complexity of life and our history-a varigated quilt of good and bad.
To perpetrate any myth you have to have the storytellers to repeat the stories over and over. Or today the equivelent is our neutered media which has sold themselves out for 30 pieces of silver. While I have an atavistic(is that the right expression)hatred toward bushco my deeper loathing has focused on the MSM. You can’t sell any snake oil if there isn’t any PR person out there talking it up and touting how good it is over/over(like that fucken shock/awe debacle where news media acted like it was some kind of goddam light show with no regard to people being killed)
Domestic policy is disintegrating but it is the Iraq invasion that is going to take down bush. I don’t see any old school reporters or the media as being in on this until they start to smell the stink of bushco being on the losing end and their power over the media slipping due to public opinion. I believe there will be some new names(along with older names like Hersh or Robert Fisk) and the internet that will keep pushing the DSM and other Iraq stories, the continuing body count that will be the beginning of the end.
At least I hope this is so. So my own myth of America gets some of it’s luster back.
Thanks for this post. I teach a first year college survey course on Latin America, and we deal with a lot of this history (Church Committee, covert action in Cuba, overthrow of Allende in Chile, Central America, Iran-Contra, etc.)
Apparently, American ‘innocence’ is not like virginity–it is possible to lose it over and over again….