–Unattended diary alert! I’ll have to disappear sporadically throughout the day – please feel free to use this as an open thread for all things Supreme Court related if the need arises.
![]() |
Today is Supreme Court day!
Ten commandments, internet file sharing…. and speculation that Rehnquist could resign today. I don’t have anything intelligent to say about the cases which will be decided, but I am interested in the question – “Are we going to spend this summer in a confirmation fight?” |
So in a ‘just in case’ kind of a way … some of the potential replacements are:
![]() |
Samuel Alito. He was appointed to the appeals court by the first President Bush, Alito served in the Justice Department during the Reagan and Bush administrations. He gets rave reviews from lawyers for his legal acumen and has written some controversial opinions, including one on abortion reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. (In that opinion he supported state restrictions.) |
![]() |
Michael Lutig. He has been on the appeals court for 14 years and is one of the most conservative judges in the country. He is extremely plugged in politically, having served in top jobs in both the Reagan and first Bush administration. He wrote the decision striking down the 1994 Violence Against Women Act. |
![]() |
John Roberts. He served as a law clerk to Chief Justice Rehnquist, deputy solicitor general, and head of the appellate section for the firm of Hogan & Hartson. He has argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court and won 25. Pro-choice groups would likely oppose his nomination because as deputy solicitor general, Roberts wrote briefs urging the reversal of Roe v. Wade. |
![]() |
Harvie Wilkinson is the former chief judge of the appeals court in Richmond on which he sits. He is a respected conservative, a former top official in the civil rights division of the Reagan Justice Department and a former clerk to Justice Lewis Powell. He is almost as conservative as Judge Luttig, but the two have exchanged unusually sharp words in their opinions. He was recently reversed by the Supreme Court – his view of absolute presidential authority in an enemy combatant decision was too extreme for Rehnquist. |
![]() |
Emilio Garza. He has served for 14 years on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, earning a reputation as a staunch conservative and foe of Roe v. Wade. (He called RvW “inimical to the Constitution”.) |
![]() |
Or… horror of horrors, Alberto Gonzales. |
Each of these bios quote directly from an NPR article here with additions by me.
Sorry this diary has absolutely nothing relevant to say, I just wanted to get it up, and provide a forum for discussion.
Please talk amongst yourselves….
Update [2005-6-27 7:15:51 by zander]: Slate has a great look at the Shortlist.
They have included Michael McConnell, who I believe is an unlikely candidate by virtue of being a respected and well-liked academic, who has previously been called “Bush’s most distinguished nominee”. Yea – right.
And also Edith Brown Clement. Glancing over her record right now, I’m tempted to say that she just doesn’t sound adequately evil to be a serious contender….
Don’t be silly, this is all very relevant.
I wish that bush for once would do the right thing and nominate a moderate judge. It’s not like he need to the nut case vote to be re-elected again.
But he would need the Supreme Court to install him as emperor for life…or indefinitely delay elections for national security reasons…
Good point
I’m thinking you should add John “Let the Eagle Soar” Ashcroft to your photo gallery…
Sorry for the pessimistic and scary thought…
<wince> ssshhhh – don’t even speak the name…lord only knows what grievous harm he’s managing to do while ‘consulting’ – besides, I think he’s too old, they’re out to screw the country for as many decades as possible.
God help us you could be right.
No 10 commandments on the courthouse…LINK
…how pissed the fundies are – I’m pissed!
WTF?
Yeah, I got to that part AFTER I posted my comment, sorry! I was too excited, I guess…
No -me too – jumping…..
It doesn’t look pretty though… 2 exhibits in Kentucky cross the line, Texas doesn’t…. they left ‘permissible if in honor of the nation’s history’ wiggle room.
It was Sandra Day O’Connor who dissented…
OK, legal mind I’m not – but on the surface doesn’t the ‘permissible in honor of history’ combined with ‘commandments have a proper place’ – mean….
Does this mean that the ruling is only precedent setting for other challenges?
An historical battle
…In the mid-1950s the idea caught the attention of Hollywood director, Cecil B. DeMille, who wanted to promote his new film, The Ten Commandments.
…With a flare for publicity, his twist was to build monuments to the tablets…
Over the years, thousands were erected in schools, courtrooms and public grounds, including the Texas State capitol in Austin.
The monument here in Austin is pretty non-descript and unobtrusive, and though I would personally rather see it moved, there is no way that the SCOTUS could rule against it without having to do some serious redecorating of their own….
link to a story about it…the picture is terribly misleading…it is possible to walk right into the capitol without ever seeing that monument.
I really don’t give a rat’s ass about SYMBOLISM, I just want the church out of the courtrooms and out of my life!
view. I am naot making a judgement about the ruling. I haven’t yet read it. But it is important to understand there there is a separation of church and state, not church and politics or church and public.
well, ok, I’m not asking that it be “kept from my view” so much as I’m asking for it not to be rammed down my throat.
All I’m asking is that if people want stuff like this (in government, in politcs, in public — I AM the public!) they must be willing to say that I get equal time/space/consideration/respect , even if I am a nopagan-agnositc-multideist, you see?
Thanks – it was the 6 foot tall part that tweaked me… and the brand spanking new look – I only now learned that it was placed in the 60’s… <wince> I feel the same way – it would be hard to care so much if it wasn’t for the threat of an AmericanTaliban…
They already are. Someone over at Kos posted a sampling of their angry quotes.
If anyone in the Chicago Area sees this:
we are having a rally one day after a vacancy is announced to tell bush we want a consensus candidate, not an extremist right wing candidate. here is the rally info:
In Chicago:
Federal Plaza (Adams & Dearborn), 5:30pm
In Arlington Heights:
The Daily Herald (155 E. Algonquin Rd.), 6:00pm
In St. Charles:
The Daily Herald (3805 E. Main St.), 6:00pm
(if they announce anything june 30 or july 1, the rally will be july 5)
spread the word – thanks