On the heels of the announcement of a Halliburton contract to build a new $30 million facility at Guantanamo, comes this news about four prison construction projects in Iraq. The prisoner populations at current U.S.-run facilities are ballooning as more “insurgents” are captured. The plans, reports The Los Angeles Times, include:
- expansion of Abu Ghraib
- expansion of Camp Bucca,
- a large-scale expansion of Camp Cropper near the Baghdad Airport where “high value” prisoners are held, and
- construction of a new prison at Suleimania, in northern Iraq, that will hold 2,000 prisoners
“[T]he construction boom will increase the total U.S. long-term detention capability to more than 16,000 prisoners.” And, the timeline for turning over Abu Ghraib to the Iraqi Ministry of Justice has been moved ahead to February 2006.
So overwhelmed are the prisons that MPs have been reassigned to Camp Bucca and Abu Ghraib “from other duties in Iraq, including the vital task of training new Iraqi police officers.”
What do I know but wouldn’t a little habeas corpus help lower the prison population? That way, our MPs can train policemen and new facilities won’t have to be built. But the LAT piece describes the slow, inadequate prisoner “review” process.
And who in the hell in the U.S. military is going to be left available to guard the expanded facilities? So, what’s going on here? … Below
I’ll bet it is. (Ka-ching.)
I’ve searched the DOD site for details on any contracts, but am coming up empty. The LAT doesn’t mention the awarding of any contracts to date. We’ll have to keep our eyes out for the names of the companies that get these lucrative construction projects.
At Guantanamo, the ka-ching goes like this:
The project is to be carried out by Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root Services of Arlington, Virginia. It includes site work, heating ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing and electrical work, the Pentagon said. … (Reuters/Yahoo, June 16, 2005)
More background info from the LAT article, reprinted in today’s Seattle Times:
The number of U.S.-held prisoners in Iraq reached all-time record levels earlier in June and has since gone down slightly. Through Saturday the average prisoner total in June stood at 10,783, up from 7,837 in January and 5,435 in June 2004.
The two main U.S. Army-run prisons, Abu Ghraib outside Baghdad and Camp Bucca, are operating near their maximum or “surge” emergency limits. As of Saturday, the two prisons held 10,178 inmates, with an additional 1,630 awaiting processing in different Army divisional and brigade headquarters.
“We’re pushing our surge capacity,” said Army spokesman Lt. Col. Guy Rudisill in Baghdad.
<P<[…]
Brandenburg emphasized that he still hopes to end the U.S. presence at Abu Ghraib by early next year. But with a large percentage of the detainees taken into custody in and around the capital, the general estimates he will still need capacity to hold around 2,000 prisoners in the Baghdad area.
… [T]he eventual Abu Ghraib departure will coincide with a large-scale expansion of the Camp Cropper prison, which is on a U.S. base near Baghdad International Airport and now houses “high value” prisoners such as Saddam’s top lieutenants and possibly Saddam himself.
The expansion campaign will cost just more than $50 million: $30 Million for Camp Cropper, $12 million to expand Camp Bucca, $8 million to renovate Fort Suse and just less than $1 million for Abu Ghraib.
Efforts to relieve the crowding by speeding up prisoner releases have been frustrated, officials say, by an increase in prisoners deemed a high risk to commit further acts of violence if set free. A Combined Review and Release Board, composed of three U.S. officials and six Iraqis — two each from the ministries of interior, justice and human rights — reviews each new prisoner within 90 days of his arrival. The board decides which prisoners can be safely released and which ones still pose an immediate threat and must be detained long-term.
A second joint Iraqi-American review board has been created in hopes of speeding up prisoner releases. But a new breed of more hard-core detainee has partially stymied the release process.
Ka-ching. Ka-ching. Ka-ching.
more a personnel problem than a construction problem?
If we had more judicial officials for the tribunals to review each prisoner’s case, and we got rid of all the innocent Iraqis caught up in raids, the prisons’ populations would drop substantially.
If we had more MPs — NOT to guard the prisoners — but to train more Iraqis as policemen, wouldn’t that help?
And, I was trying to read between the lines here, but it sounds like the U.S. insists on putting all suspected insurgents in its prisons, rather than putting any in Iraqi-run prisons. And why is that? (Oh, the answers abound.)
Unlimited expansion of the military-industrial police state. With these new and expanded prisons, they will have plenty of room to house the American citizens this administration would like to disappear–and may yet do so.
It’s important, I think, to watch local news all across the country for similar announcements of new or enlarged prison construction. I rather doubt that this gulag is an accidental one but, rather, something that’s part of whatever passes for long-term planning in that crowd.
And, no, I am not wearing a tinfoil hat, thank you.
With the way oil prices are going, they won’t be able to afford to ship U.S. prisoners overseas.
Both the states and the feds built lots of new incarceration facilities in the 90s; though the states are broke, bushgov is still going gangbusters. The followingis a little dated (2003) but I think still valid:
Incidently, it seems that the Bureau of Prisons issues a weekly population report. The current count is 184,652, approximately 10% of whom are in privately managed prisons. Oh, and “Did you know…” asks BOP cheerily, “that 28% of federal inmates are non-US citizens?” (Those folks have a pretty macabre idea of “fun facts”).
“gulag”? Did you say “GULAG”? I have a theory which I think explains why Dick Cheney was so offended over Amesty International’s use of that word. If you’re not curious, you definitely shouldn’t read “Stress Positions” at
Sorry to shout folks but that is the other half of what these criminals are all about. Greed and Power. And there are few tribunals to sort out the innocents from the “terroists” because then they can keep the popuklation numbers up in order to say they need bigger prisons…thus the contracts that will no doubt be another no bid award for Haliburton. Have they no souls/morals or conscience? God, this makes me sick!
You said it.
QUESTIONS
How familiar are you with the de facto tribunals that are supposedly held within 90 days of a prisoner’s incarceration?
Do the prisoners have legal counsel? (I know, I know … it’s quaint, but.)
Do they have an opportunity to review all evidence and testimony against them?
Can they bring witnesses in their defense?
Do they have access to any funds towards their defense?
We can’t seem to get water and electricity restored for the people living in Iraq, but you better believe we’re going to get our prisons built!