Sometimes, as you go through your day, maybe bouncing from link to link on the ‘net, you’ll stumble across something unexpected. A picture or profile or book review — something that reminds you of something you used to do, or like. Something like Wander Woman in the Village Voice, a book review of A Field Guide to Getting Lost by Rebecca Solnit.
I was struck by this paragraph in the review:
The word lost derives from the old Norse term for “disbanding an army,” and Solnit fears that “many people never disband their armies, never go beyond what they know.” In Wanderlust she delved into the shrinkage of public space, and here she pursues the idea that children’s lack of opportunity to roam freely—”Because of their parents’ fear of the monstrous things that might happen (and do happen, but rarely)”—will strip away our culture’s sense of adventure and imagination. Wildlife has returned to many American neighborhoods because, “[a]s far as the animals are concerned, the suburbs are an abandoned landscape.”
I think that’s exactly right, and I know because I watched it happen.
crossposted from Liberal Street Fighter
We moved around a few times until I was in fourth grade, when we settled in a small town with some man-made lakes northwest of Chicago. It was a patchwork of winding streets w/ small little ranch houses, established older neighborhoods, a few planned developments and some old farms and what I thought was untamed woods. They seemed untamed to me, and as a seventies “latch key kid”, I was free to explore as a wished. Sometimes on foot, sometimes on a Schwinn Stingray, either alone or with a friend or two, I’d find a trail, a path, an unused rail bed or gurgling little stream and follow it.
I’d purposely try to get lost.
Now, there probably wasn’t much real danger of actually getting lost, but I remember walking through the fairly thick woods of northern Illinois, picking fresh mullberries, gooseberries, raspberries and blueberries off bushes as I walked. Sometimes I’d get turned around, and end up coming out far away from my usual stomping grounds. Or I’d come through a thicket of thorny bushes only to discover an old, cracked foundation, remnants of an old home nowhere near present roads. Occasionally, amongst a treefall deep in the woods, there would be an old dead campfire, some scattered beer cans, maybe a discarded Playboy, the leavings of older kids doing whatever older kids did.
Last I was back, all of those woods are gone now. It’s all subdivisions, and the abandoned rail beds are carefully laid out bike paths. I don’t know if it was better. I’m not sure that it was good that we were left so much to fend for ourselves, but that sense of unbounded possibility does seem diminished.
I used to walk or bike or hike all over the place, as well as traveling through the books I read. Sometimes I carried them with me and read them in a quiet place in the woods. Now I roam on the internet. I’m not much for walking around anymore, much to the detriment of my long-term health, no doubt.
I hadn’t thought about any of this in some time, until I stumbled across this review in Village Voice. How something I used to enjoy had been lost through the course of time.
Although the title pronounces this a field guide, it’s closer to a walkabout. Solnit’s essays sweep through myriad varieties of loss, from objects to memories to love, with plenty of slippage between the categories. She believes that losing things is intrinsic to human life, a never ending process of abandonment and discovery. “Imagine yourself streaming through time shedding gloves, umbrellas, wrenches, books, friends, homes, names,” Solnit proposes. “This is what the view looks like if you take a rear-facing seat on the train. Looking forward you constantly acquire moments of arrival, moments of realization, moments of discovery.” Solnit’s writing switches gracefully between these two modes of perception—between melancholy regret at what’s been discarded ( Hollow City documented the displacement of bohemian San Francisco in the dotcom era) and fragile optimism ( Hope in the Dark rallies around the power of grassroots activism).
I’ve always enjoyed learning new things, and I used to enjoy meeting new people, seeing new places. I look forward less and less, and won’t let myself look back. It’s important to remember to do both. It’s in the clues gleaned from both past and future that we find connections.
I’m thankful that your roaming path has crossed mine….
This evoked so many things, memories of looking forward an back — I wish I had more motivation to write and again, am thankful that you have more.
Your recollection of the forest is poignant and brought memories of my own childhood flooding back. I and my brothers, I have three, of which I’m the oldest would have been completely content to disappear for days into a forest had our mother let us. Judging by what I consider todays standards of parents needs to keep a much closer eye on their kids, I have three now myself, our Mom was really pretty good about letting us roam, although if she knew then what we have carefully over time revealed to her about some of the things we did and the places and people we saw growing up, I suspect she would have kept us much closer than she did. Before there was X-Box, Playstation, instant messaging, or the internet, we could keep ourselves occupied and enthralled with what nature had to offer, were our particular “forest” of the day a real forest, exploring all the holes and gaps in the boulders that at least used to line the eastern end of the seawall in Galveston, or a lagoon in Galveston, or a reef in the Florida Keys. My point is, I guess, that when I compare my experiences as a child to those of my own kids, I feel like mine was so much richer because of the way our society has changed. I do strive to allow them the time and freedom to explore their own forests, but at the same time I am definetily far more protective of my own kids as I see many more pitfalls and dangers today compared to then. It’s possible that I’m completely wrong about this though. Perhaps like the forest you describe as no longer being there, my own childish and fancifull notion of the world has also passed into history with only a few ancient railbeds remaining visible. If so, what a shame.
it brings this song to mind, “Thanks for the Memories” Bob Hope
and to you, Thanks for the Diary, KUDOS & Recommended
I, too, used to go and get lost in the woods not far from our house when I was a kid. As one of 5 kids, it was nearly essential for any type of solitude. At another place we lived, our entire yard was huge, full of trees, bushes, hiding places, out of sight (and yelling distance) of parents. When we left there, I hugged each of the big trees good-bye. My parents thought I was daft – but every tree was cut down within 3 years of our leaving.
Someone asked me, when I left college, what I would do if I could do anything. After eliminating being a singer (true confession here), it was to look at the effect that being in the wilds has on kids. I still think that’s important, and now, years later, a few other people do too. Nature Deficit Disorder, they called it, in that few children experience nature that is not plucked, sprayed, fertilized, clipped,and restrained by concrete and asphalt. I will quickly add that this is not a defined mental health disorder, but it is a problem.
How will any child raised with “nature” so defined and confined, be attuned to much of any environmental concern? As I’ve noted before, it will be like that car commercial where the family is driving across some of our country’s gorgeous western wilderness, and the kids are sitting in the back, watching cartoons on the DVD player built into the SUV.
My childhood was spent in a suburban neighborhood that was totally surrounded by protected land. So, we got to explore and hike and try to get lost (it’s hard on a hill where north is actually UP and south is actually DOWN — my mom could get turned around, but not too many other people!). It was the best of worlds. And because it was protected land, today it is just about the same.
Then we moved to a truly suburban neighborhood in the midwest and life was totally different. Walking meant walking down the edge of a street, because most streets didn’t even have sidewalks. And to find nature, my mom (who didn’t have a car most days, since we only had one) would have had to drive us about 15 miles to the only park of any size. And that never happened.
So, I don’t think it’s so much a matter of the technological inducements. I think it’s a matter of suburban design. Suburbs suck for kids.
Thanks for this. It reminds me of a few years ago when I was walking the dogs in a pretty secluded city park. It was quiet and peaceful when all of the sudden 4 or 5 young boys (probably 10-12 years old) came rolling through on their bikes yelling and zipping here and there. Rather than being bothered by the intrusion, it was lovely to see them playing and exploring. I was pretty startled at first and then noticed that it was because we rarely see kids experiencing this kind of freedom these days. It warmed my heart and brought back many wonderful childhood memories.
The older I get, the less I feel I fit in this busy, rush around world of “progress”. (Maybe this is a good thing; it makes the prospect of eventually moving on less of a wrenching prospect to consider?)
Nature, untouched, wild and wonderful, is my “church”, my touchstone, my foundation. I can find hardly any of it anymore, especially not here in a big concrete city, even if it is one full of beautifully manicured parks and lakes. So ten years ago, I moved way out to a quiet small town, where I could understand the pace and the people.
It only took one year , before the concrete came to replace the gorgeous deep green soybean fields and small wooded area next door, and practically overnight, walla! Another huge development stood where they had been. I used to drive through these new developments during the week, and marvel at how they looked like modern day ghost towns: no one was home. All were on the long road to the city, or in the city, working insane hours so as to afford the “good life” in the far ring suburbs.
I did a gig as a visiting poet in the high school English classes there. The children of these upwardly mobile parents, when encouraged to write poetry about their lives, wrote volumes about..loneliness. About not knowing, for sure they were loved or wanted. My informal survey revealed the average amount of quality, face to face one to one time they experienced, with either parent in a usual week, was three to five hours. They filled most of their other hours with electronic distractions, and each other, if they were part of the “in crowd.”
I was not in love with my own “good old days” either, but I am very concerned about the huge pendulum swing that has taken place in America. Not only is the home no longer the “safe and ever present center” of way too many our kids worlds, all too often it’s more of a place to simple sleep and keep your “stuff”, and meet up with the parents when they have time.
I fear it’s not only the woods we’ve lost, it’s a lot of the basic values that made America what it is. Mainly, we seem to have lost the value of community: the sense of us being here not just “every one for themselves,” but also, for each other. How can we care about our communities or our environment, enough to want to work together to build them, or care for them decently, when we don’t feel a part of any community at all? Or when the best of our energies are spent chasing down all the material “evidence of sucess” we are brainwashed into thinking we “must” have?
And how are all these these latchkey kids, who have never ever experienced “community”, or the safety and wonder of free wheeling adventures in the natural world, going to know what these are truly worth?
It’s all too much for me to figure out. The one thing I know I can do about any of this, is tell stories of how it used to be, like you did in this diary. Not with a judgemental attitude of “it was so much better then”, but with a sincere desire to share the good and wonderful parts of our pasts, in the hopes they ignite a curiosity and an interest to explore the non material part of life, in those who read them.
Thanks for your words.
Scribe, in working with troubled kids in this city, we have identified some of those who are at most risk as being “attachment disordered.” While I don’t have a lot of faith in the mental health arena these days, I have done a lot of thinking about that particular diagnosis. Certainly some of the kids we see have a severe loss of attachment to anyone who can practially care for them. But I think about the fact that our entire culture has a case of attachment disorder. We are so disconnected from family, community, the natural world and all of the things that sustain us. Its just that the most vulnerable in our midst exhibit the most extreme symptoms. Anyway, this is something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately.
I also used to wander as a kid. For roughly the four years inclusive from the start of 1979 to the end of 1982, between the ages of 9 and 13, I lived in a mostly undeveloped area outside of Gig Harbor, WA:
The red dot among trees is the house where I lived. It was a large log house, built in the mid-70s, originally as part of a 20-acre plot. The yellow bracket shows a mile-long stretch along a road to the north, for scale. Each of the squares in the roughly one-mile square area below that point, now dominated by a golf course and suburban developments, is about 20 acres.
When we first moved there, our house was pretty much alone in that square. The previous owner had gone through a divorce and sold off fifteen of the acres earlier to bring in some cash, so my parents bought the 5 acres in the southeast part of that 20-acre plot. But the rest of the 20 acres was undeveloped and usually unoccupied, as was most of that one-mile square area. As kids, my sisters and I would play for hours in that whole wooded area, which descended into an adventurous swamp half a mile down before ascending to the road on the west. That was a whole universe for us to get lost in, and those first couple of years were a lifetime of good memories.
A couple years in, symbolically about the same time my mom and step-dad’s marriage started to fall apart, the developers started encroaching. First was the development of the country club and gated community to the south, which at first did not reach to us and so seemed a remote threat. But now my wanderings occasionally brought me to the edge of newly planted and well-manicured lawns, a playground for the rich with their horse stables (the golf course came later). Then the fifteen acres around us were put into “development.” Tractors mowed down trees within sight of our wooded retreat to build exploratory roads for eventual suburban homes. They piled the brush and smaller trees fifteen feet high and burned them in fires so hot it was impossible to approach closer than about twenty feet. It was the Lorax come to life and destroying my playground. Sure, legally, it was never mine, but in the important sense it was.
For the last year or so that we lived there, until my own family’s divorce forced my mom, me, and siblings to move, the primitive dirt roads on the fifteen acres around us were untouched, nasty wounds in the landscape, apparently forgotten with some obstacle in developer financing. A couple of years later, a small suburban development went in. The trees seem to have grown back in places since then, so that the wound is not as fresh, but the country club finished its golf course and other suburban homes moved in, and the world we knew was gone. Looking at the satellite picture, the amount of development immediately around our old house doesn’t seem so bad, though “Canterwood,” the gated community and golf course, looks like the blight it is and was.
Now, 20 years after that, our whole society has embraced the values of the bulldozer, and the protected suburban home, and the safety of not letting kids run free. Even as an adult, knowing the dangers that threaten kids (and always have, ours is no more dangerous a time for kids than that was), I think something very important has been lost.
Those were also the years when I first read The Lord of the Rings, which makes my sig. even more appropriate: