Who knew that the Tacoma News-Tribune could dish such snark directly at the White House:
“Yet to the Bush administration,” editorializes TNT, “pot is the greater drug threat. When local officials are pleading for more help in fighting the growing meth scourge, the administration is proposing to cut $804 million in federal grants that local governments use to combat meth …” More below:
Ghostdancer way grabbed the ball from last night’s BooTrib story, “The Meth Crisis,” and posted a significant diary this morning — The War on Drugs in America. Ghostdancer way’s diary contains some valuable background information and helpful links.
Today’s TNT editorial adds needed punches right where they belong — smack dab at President Bush:
That’s an incredibly myopic view of the problem. Meth addiction occurs soon after use begins – and the consequences to society are staggering. Meth use is directly linked to burglary, identity theft and domestic violence rates as well as a rise in foster-care placements. Children who are taken from home meth labs are often hungry, neglected and ill.
The cost of treating imprisoned addicts’ many serious health problems is driving up justice system costs. And contaminated property must be cleaned up, often at public expense. In Pierce County alone, 542 meth labs were cleaned up last year. That’s more than one-third of the 1,399 labs discovered statewide.
The administration might be wearing blinders when it comes to meth, but local officials – the people on the front lines of the real drug war – are all too aware of the problem …
Washington state is leading the way with the full involvement of its members of Congress and state laws passed that require that cold medicines be sold behind the counter in drug stores:
Congress should block the administration’s attempt to cut funds to local police departments. Some of those agencies are just starting to make progress against meth in their communities. To cut funding now would be more than foolish; it would be tragic.
There was a post on this subject in last Thursday’s Drug WarRant.
If any of you have never had the opportunity to have contact with someone who is addicted to meth, I suggest you volunteer at a local woman’s shelter, child protection shelter or local hospital to see the extent of the damage done to human beings from this horrible drug.
Susan is right, it tears apart childrens lives, their families and their ability to recognize their own parents. It tears the childhood out of a child when their mothers, fathers or so called responsible adult is addicted to this drug.
Having had to deal with many of these parents when I worked in an alcohol and drug treatment program designed to keep families together. You see many pregnant women use drugs during their pregnancy and in California, every baby is drug tested and if positive for drugs, the child is removed from the parents custody. Only through going through the steps ordered by the courts were the parents allowed to regain custody of their child or children. I can tell you first hand that more than 4 out of ten women failed to regain custody and less then 2 out of ten fathers regained custody or visitation rights. The majority of these people were meth users, who would do anything to keep the drug flowing in their bodies, but would not do anything to keep their children in their lives.
If you don’t believe Susan or myself that this drug is insidious and vile, check out a local hospital, treatment program, attend an NA meeting or just look around you for that gaunt, sallow, sunken eyed looking person who looks like they are plugged into an electric socket. You found a meth head.
Note to self, use spell check, use spell check, do not post comments when answering calls to help desk, use spell check.
opportutiy = opportunity
Yesterday on a radio show I heard the ususal defense of the Administration’s drug policy: people who use hard drugs almost always used pot first, so if we prevent pot use, we prevent hard drug use.
It’s the same flawed mentality as the one that says that abstinence programs prevent pregnancy. There is an almost perfect correlation between the prevalence of abstinance programs and unwanted pregnancies.
Honesty and information are the best strategies to minimize the damage caused by drug abuse and unwanted pregnancy.
With meth abuse, we don’t need to adopt hyperbolic scare tactics: meth abuse really does fuck you up.
With unwanted pregnancy, you simply encourage birth control, and point out that the best method of birth control is abstinence.
I am so sick of this administration interfering in our lives in simplistic, ham-handed ways. They are speaking to the sheeple, who also happen to be their constituency.
I endured the DARE lectures at the public school where I volunteered last year.
Marijuana was portrayed as a horrifying drug that led kids to worse drugs. I suppose that happens, but …
(Another thing that bothered me about the DARE lectures and materials was that it TAUGHT the kids a lot about drugs. Me too! Before my DARE education, I never knew much about the range of household chemicals, etc. that kids sniff. Now, every night, I’m lookin’ under the kitchen sink …)
It’s the inverse. It’s like a shady car repairman who does just enough to fix your car for 3 months, then require another repair. If the administration can fight the quixotic problem of pot while ignoring every easier battle, then he can always claim small victories and say there is a need for the drug war. These sorts of things are their day job, do you really think they want to “win and go home?” This isn’t tin-foil hat territory. Our local Rep party universally thought “The War on Drugs” was a GREAT avenue for local money, support, and campaigning.
There is MUCH we could do to stop the meth problem, and we should. This shit is born of nightmares. Breezing through reports on crystal meth addiction is like reading A Scanner Darkly. It plainly scares the willies out of you.
You go insane. You can’t sleep. Your teeth rot out. You can’t break the painful addiction. You slowly loose control of yourself.
I tried pot one time back in college. I can honestly say I get more of a buzz off of caffiene. Why should we still fight pot on the compromised words of some crack-pot agent 90 years ago?