What could be more damning than the charges Edmonds has made?
The charges are as follows:
- Certain “semi-legit organizations” operating inside the United States facilitated the 9-11 attacks through money laundering and narcotics trafficking activities on behalf of the terrorists (one of these Organizations has been revealed to be the Brent Scowcroft-led American Turkish Council).
- These Organizations have ties to powerful people in the U.S. government
- Targets of the FBI investigations of these Organizations were deliberately allowed to leave the country months after 9-11, a la the Bin Laden family airlift.
Combining the above facts with the knowledge that it is the Bush administration that has been leading a frontal assault on Ms. Edmonds might lead one to conclude that Sibel Edmonds has evidence that would lead to the impeachment and removal of office of the Bush/Cheney team. And there is quite reason to think this is so.
So why then, have not the Democrats been calling for public hearings on Ms. Edmonds case? Why did they not leak her testimony to the public on the eve of the presidential election, and thereby hand the White House to John Kerry?”
MORE: “Ms. Edmonds is quoted by Steve Perry as saying, ” . . . I have had certain Democrats who have wanted to do absolutely nothing with it. In fact they would say that they don’t want to mess with it, because considering the upcoming election, it would hurt the Democrats.”
EVEN MORE: Edmonds let out an even more telling clue. Note the following exchange I hand transcribed:
Horton: . . . are we talking about ties between these semi-legit organizations and officials in the Bush administration?
Edmonds: One thing I have said is that the issues I have talked about are by no means partisan . . . some of this intelligence goes back to 1997, 1998 and continues to this day, right now . . .
Since most of Edmonds rhetorical fire in the past has been directed at the Executive Branch, her pointing out the time frame would seem to indicate that both the Bush and Clinton administrations have some involvement in the scandal. This is a detail which might explain why the congressional Democrats are so reticent to take up Sibel Edmonds’ cause. Could the legacy of Bill Clinton, along with George W. Bush be at stake?”
With any research is it evident that through incompetency or corruption, the government was involved with 9-11 taking place. Further that Clinton is no angel, much like bush(s). As much of the country dickers over who was worse; bush or clinton, the country is being destroyed from within. Easy to see the destruction if one looks.
UNITED We Stand, Divided We Fall !!! Quite simple folks. The current so called Republicans and so-called Democrats are out to destroy America as we know it. Destroying America, while they become filthy rich. Bush/cheney/rice, or hilary/kerry the divison will continue. Many of todays politicians are out to line their thieir own pockets as well as those corporations that make them rich.
