To Whose Benefit, this “Cui Bono?”
To tell you the truth, I’m getting a bit sick of all the thoughtful, allusive, grey-beard-pulling making the rhetorical rounds these days. All any wiser-than-wise alternative pundit needs to say this week is Cui bono?…and arguments are a priori quelled, stomped on, pulled from the shelves as stale post-sell-by-date refuse. I’d really like to sponsor an investigation into who benefits from this phrase-borne viral phenomenon.
First of all, I’ll make crystal-clear that I am entirely of the belief that 9/11, 7/7 and the upcoming “whatever” are of unadulterated Western origin. I am convinced that the U.S. (and Israel) connived to bring about our millenial disasters for fun and profit. And I’m also convinced that MI6 has not only learned from but acted in accordance with false-flag examples in recent weeks.
What I can’t abide is the smug, know-it-all rhetoric abounding in the ether that hints at all and reveals/resolves nothing. Let’s have forthright accusation, all you sly-boots; or keep your unrisen dough to yourselves. Do some serious and seriously dangerous digging. Cui bono doesn’t cut it – not entirely.
This is very interesting, but I’m not sure I know what you mean. Who are these beard pullers? Are there people making the rounds now claiming that 9/11 was an inside job — besides Griffin for example, or some of the 9/11 sites on the web? In their case, I think they are still asking questions — they don’t have the answers, but they have anomalous evidence. I don’t think they are intentionally withholding info — they just don’t know.
But your exasperation reminds of my involvement with the UFO community. Several years ago, I used to attend the local MUFON meetings. There were a bunch old-timer investigators there who ran the show. They had the habit of dropping little hints about some sighting or some gov’t activity, etc. And it was always on the verge of being exposed, but then at the next meeting, there would be no follow up. I put up with this for a couple of years, but after that I was tired of what seemed like an endless wild goose chase.
Yes, Tauri, I’m exasperated because there is so much EVIDENCE of the profiteering and the underpinnings of governmental malfeasance/murder. Allusive, fakely subtle questions as to who profits from terrorism are (and I hate to use the word) disingenuous. The whole thing is obvious from the get-go and all we really need is honest reporting of facts.
This “administration” is engaged in a project of total domination. Its greatest cudgel is the threat of “terror” and death. Terror and death are, therefore, what it initiates and what it excels in.
I’m tired of the kind of insinuating, sneaky need that reporters seem to feel, to justify their suspicions with a “Cui bono?” side-slip from accusation to that much weaker stance, insinuation.