There’s one thing that should really concern you about Bush’s speech. No, it’s not that the president of the United States cannot be trusted to button his own shirt. No, it’s not even the faint background music of Dixie when Bush declared that the Gulf Coast would “rise again.”
While the news concentrates on the enormous cost of Bush’s proposals, and the wingnuts vibrate into another dimension demanding sacrifices they would never had thought to ask in funding Iraq, both have missed the important point.
Near the end of the speech is the nugget of truth among the warmed over LBJ impersonation.
Believe it or not, the most frightening thing in Bush’s speech was not the way he could stand in the middle of an evacuated city and smirk. It was hidden way down there, in the middle of one of the whining segments of the speech. Remember the part that opened with:
The purpose of that part is clear enough. This was not his fault! No one could have foreseen a storm that had both wind and rain. A couple of seconds later comes the kicker:
There. Catch that last sentence? It summarizes everything Bush really has to say about the situation.
- It repeats the “I was hampered by legalities” excuse, implying that he didn’t act because (insert your favorite latin legal phrase) restrained him.
- It spreads the blame to state and local governments that knew they were out of their depth and had already begged for federal assistance.
- The power grab. This is the real heart of the thing — “requires greater federal authority.” Bush will now use the Katrina disaster as a means to gather still more power to his administration.
To see how this will work, you have only to look at the response to 9/11. Everyone directly involved agreed that the government had not been hampered by law or institutional barriers, but had only failed through plain old government inertia and because the Bush administration was not paying enough attention to the problem. Even so, the immediate response of the Bush administration was to use 9/11 as an opportunity to grab more power to themselves, and to erode civil liberties.
Now that pattern is repeating itself. The situation in New Orleans had nothing to do with legal restrictions which kept the federal government out. However, Bush will now use Katrina as an excuse to gather more powers to himself.
- Expect new legislation that makes it the decision of the president, not the governor, when to send in the troops.
- Expect new legislation that makes it easier for the president to declare martial law.
- Expect new legislation that makes it easier for the president to take control of national guard troops, including units within their home state.
- Expect this new legislation to be used much more broadly than in the case of nation disasters.
In effect, expect Bush to use this excuse to overturn Posse Comitatus as it now stands, and to rework the National Guard as an extension of the federal executive. For everyone on the right who ever used the “well, the federal government doesn’t have a national police force” meme — Bush is about to solve that problem for you.
Because sometimes I get a bug in my ear and think other people ought to hear about it.
We had a shot to shrink the planet, create unity and a sense of working together right after 9/11. Or, watch an historic power grab. You’re right, this is an extension. Funny thing is, the public demanded it when the disaster response went awry.
REALLY got to watch what you wish for….
.
Drop the ball and are running in the opposite direction!
Excellent observations and diary :: this is the creative thinking any democracy needs to succeed.
I listened to the Governor of Mississippi, Haley Barbour on European broadcast of CNNi Larry King. Very sympathetic and down-to-earth remarks, which included a warning for Bush NOT to send in federal troops to take over the Reconstruction of the Gulf Coast.
The Mississippians are very well equipped and willing to reconstruct their own homes, community, townships – but need assistance from the Federal Government. Hurricane Katrine has destroyed all infrastructure along the coast that was build over a period of three centuries.
.
Much more an discussion on the air, with (D) Senator Harold Ford Jr. from Tennessee. A forum discussion on the economic impact and Federal Funding for a state disaster.
Stephen Moore– Club for Growth – did not want tax reforms repealed, spoke of needless New Deal funding of city and state disaster. State should seek private funding for reconstruction. Agreed with Pork Amnesty remarks by Democrats. Estate tax reform should go ahead however, and keep low taxes in place [for the wealthy].
▼ ▼ ▼
I’m glad you posted this – I came here to see if anyone had picked it up. So, any major fires, storms floods, give him an excuse to be commander in chief and lead from behind while citizens have to get used to armed troops on the streets of their towns and cities.
Fires? Floods?
How about “civic unrest,” such as that coming up on the 24th of this month?
Goddamm right and I am doing all I can to facilitate it.
Is there really a need for Congress to rubber-stamp these things?
Surely their corporate sponsors would rather see them spend the time on other matters.
Excellent Diary! And I did notice that line about the federal troops.
Also I heard (or read) somewhere, (link anyone?)that Bush expected Gov Blanco to agree to allowing to allow the feds military control over all security prior to committing aid. Gov Blanco refused, and some time passed before Bush acquiesced. I fear some unknown “soldiers” died for this element of our freedom.
What a precedence that would have been, had she not refused. I hope someone can provide further clarification on this.
Also, did anyone notice the lack of any mention of Nation Guard by Bush, and much more interestingly the lack of any comment with regards to the NG by the punditocracy following the sermon.
I’m disappointed this one didn’t get much traction. No doubt there’ll be further attempts at militarization. We’ll have to find some new info that warrants running this one up the flag pole again.