Within the next three months, Alan Greenspan will retire. Personally, I don’t put him in the complete “political hack” category, although I will admit he has made some questionable calls for what appear to be purely partisan reasons. My main complaint with Greenspan is his failure to raise interest rates in the 1990s and 2000’s to prevent asset bubbles from bursting. But, that is not the reason for this essay.
The reality is the US economy is entering a very difficult period. We are facing a second asset bubble bursting, energy inflation, a federal deficit out of control, another year with a record trade imbalance, global competition driving down US wages, extreme income stratification and a lack of any meaningful economic development to create 21st century jobs. One of these tasks alone would be difficult; together they almost seem insurmountable. To deal with them, we need leadership – strong-willed leadership. We need someone like Paul Volcker.
For those of you unfamiliar with Volcker, he is my favorite Fed chairman (yes I actually have a favorite Fed Chairman – I am a real econ geek). In the early 1980s, the US was in the midst of stagflation – high unemployment and inflation. Volcker had the unenviable task of dealing with this situation. His answer was to jack-up interest rates until inflation dropped to a manageable level. It was a painful period as the US went through 2 recessions. However, there was no other way to wring inflation out of the system without this policy measure.
Volcker knew he was creating pain for the economy as a whole. He was criticized and burned in effigy. However, he stick to his guns and 25 years later, we are better for it. While he didn’t completely beat inflation, he certainly put it in its place.
And here is where the problem comes. We need another Volcker in the US economic policy arena. We need someone who will stand-up and call a spade a spade. We need someone who will be willing to disagree with the administration when their policies are wrong. We need someone who will say for the deficit to go, you either have to lower spending or increase taxes. We need someone who will say a trade imbalance like the US’ is unsustainable. We need someone who will talk about needing to create good-paying jobs. We need an economic leader.
Bush’s track record on appointments is to seek out the most loyal person – not the most qualified or able. Bush doesn’t have enough confidence in his own opinions to deal with disagreement nor the self-confidence to admit policy mistakes. As a result, we face a strong possibility of an economic sycophant like Treasury Secretary Snow.
Should Bush appoint someone like Snow – a glorified yes man – we will be in very deep trouble. We will lack someone with a vision for dealing with these Bush created problems. In short, we will be in for a rougher economic road.
is a terrifying thought.
A terrifying thought, indeed.
Edmund L. Andrews of the NYT reports on Snow’s current trip to China.
If you’ve got any ideas about who that might be, now’s the time to start lobbying. Maybe we can save the Senate some time. <grin>
Several weeks back, or more, some Wallstreet-Type (who did not identify himself) called in to the Ed Schultz radio show. W-Type claimed to have some connections into WH with regards to the selection of the next Fed Chairman.
The main point of what I remember was that the new Fed Chairman would be continuing the current [well, what I’d call]”real estate bubble.”
IMHO, that plan would tend to support the current state of the economy, but only short term, maybe to ’08?. However, under this scenario I would expect the long term repercussions to be more severe.
The real estate bubble will continue as long as people think real estate values will rise — are a “good investment.”
Oh, the FED can keep shoveling the Greenbacks out the back door to the banks but people have to take those loans. And they ain’t gonna do it once real estate is deemed to be a “bad investment.”
And, of course, their income must be in the neighborhood (HA!) of the monthly mortgage payment.
All bubbles burst.
This is a housing bubble.
This housing bubble will burst. (QED)
When? Beats me. Could be years from now. Could be next month. shrug
If that is the situation, we are in for a big problem.
To maintain the current situation, the Fed would have to again lower interest rates. Given the energy inflation the US us currently facing, this would be a recipe for disaster.
The reality is interest rates are still historically low. Moving the discount rate to, say 5.5% – 6% would not be disasterous for the economy.
WaPo article you might find interesting. An Economy On Thin Ice By Paul A. Volcker
One of my favorite articles. I cite it often. And it is still very accurate.
The Nation is reporting that NYC real estate prices have dipped 13% over the last 3 mos. Bubble meet pin.
Now then. Paul Volker? Paul “the Vulture” Volker? Are you just plain fucking nuts? Do yo have any idea how utterly catastrophic that was for ordinary mortal human fucking beings?
He didn’t tap the brakes to slow down in a skid and slow the other cars, you know. He jammed on the brakes, swerved into traffic and rolled the fucking car into the damned ditch. Eased in Ronald fucking AIDS bastard Reagan. Actually killed people, sucides, murders, divorces. Kids caught in his antics grew up without their fathers.
Why don’t you know that? It’d be my guess that you were likely not there, too young. You’re a damned punk aren’t you? Well, Punk, you’ve got a hell of a lot of reading to do.
I’m well aware of the consesqunces of high interest rates.
Regrettable, that was the course of action to take. The US was approaching a point of hyper-inflation. There is no easy and painless way to cure this problem.
If you thought the early 80s were bad, correcting the current excesses is going to be just as bad. There is no easy way.
Wow, bonddad, way to respond calmly!! I want to be you when I grow up!!
That was a brutal recession. The worst in 60 yrs at that time since the great depression. The world will be affected in a very bad way also when we stop importing 600 billion a year. Hopefully the next Fed will continue to push rates up at Greenspan’s gradual pace. Big jumps the economy crashes not just slows were sitting on a house of cards.
Good morning,
I don’t know you, and I certainly won’t judge you. But my day would have been far more pleasant without: “You’re a damned punk aren’t you? Well, Punk, you’ve got a hell of a lot of reading to do.”
Wishing you a good day, sans the name calling.
You can also be a prick without name calling as Bonddad has demonstrated. These are extremely serious matters upon which lives hinge and there is absolutely NO justification for getting it wrong. In my view a prick can also be someone who inadequately researches hemlock and then urges the drinking of it to cure the common cold.
Yes, it is possible to violate Rule #1 without resorting to a direct attack.
However, shooting the messenger may give you warm fuzzies and relieve anger — but it won’t get you accurate information. You wrote, “These are extremely serious matters upon which lives hinge and there is absolutely NO justification for getting it wrong.” Unless informed opinions are considered there is no hope of “getting it right.”
I lived through the Volcker years and – trust me – I NEVER want to go through that again. I also know there are historic circumstances: Hyperinflation and Depression, that are even worse. If you don’t think these are possibilities … well – you’re fooling yourself.
Why don’t you know that? It’d be my guess that you were likely not there, too young. You’re a damned punk aren’t you? Well, Punk, you’ve got a hell of a lot of reading to do.”
This kind of comment has no place in this forum.
Rule# 1 is: Don’t Be a Prick.
Volker was a prick and deserves no support. Inflation today isn’t even 10%. This is nuts.
While his policy presecription (high interest rates) is not warranted in the current economy, his personality is. Someone who is forceful, strong-willed and well-educated in economic matters is most definitely required in today’s climate.
That’s the central point of this essay: the Fed needs someone who will come out and say what needs to be said — in effect, to tell the truth about the underlying problems of the US economy so the US can deal with them.