Thank you all for your wonderful participation yesterday. (LINK: to yesterday’s discussion of BAYOU FAREWELL by Mike Tidwell)
Now we know how we got here, to a place where Katrina could devastate the coast. Let’s use this diary to continue our discussion of the book and especially to talk about what happened to the coast during Katrina and what happens, or doesn’t, next.
Please bring any info you have found about post-Katrina and share your thoughts about the solutions.
And now, here’s Mike Tidwell writing after Katrina:
By Mike Tidwell
LINK: Complete Essay
. . .of the many shocking stories emerging from Katrina, here’s the most shocking: Right now, with similar irresponsibility, the Bush Administration is ignoring raw data and reports from its own agencies that say every single coastal city in America – from New York to Savannah to Los Angeles – could soon become a New Orleans. (. . .)
In all the recent coverage, the media seem to have uncritically accepted the very weird fact that the city of New Orleans lies below sea level. (. . .)New Orleans is a sunken, walled city essentially jutting out like an exposed chin toward the fast-approaching fist of the Gulf. Had Katrina struck two hundred or one hundred or even fifty years ago, the destruction would not have been the same. In 2005, there simply were no land structures left to slow Katrina’s sledgehammer blow.
The good news is there’s a plan to recreate much of that lost land. A detailed restoration scheme has been on the table since the 1990s to literally “re-engineer” the coast, according Louisiana governor Kathleen Blanco. The plan is to build up to a dozen dam-like “control” structures right into the levees of the Mississippi. These would then release the sediment-thick water into canals or pipelines that would surgically direct the liquid soil toward the barrier islands and the buffering marshlands that need immediate restoration. This so-called “Coast 2050” plan (visit www.crcl.org) will take many years to fully implement, but the cost is ridiculously cheap at $14 billion. That’s just two weeks of spending in Iraq or the cost of Boston’s “Big Dig.” Yet tragically, like Louisiana’s pre-Katrina requests for federal help bolstering insufficient levees in New Orleans, the Bush Administration has spent four and a half years repeatedly refusing even modest investments in the larger coastal restoration efforts. Given the horror of Katrina, one can only assume the President will now reassess his budgetary priorities. As a nation, our first responsibility is to address the storm’s great humanitarian crisis of this storm. Beyond that, however, it would be criminally irresponsible of us to fix a single broken window in New Orleans or pick up a single piece of debris or fix a single cubic foot of levee without simultaneously committing – as a nation – to the massive plan to rebuild the entire Louisiana coast. To do one without the other is to simply set the table for the next nightmare hurricane.
Global warming: We all live in New Orleans now
(. . .a section on the world-wide effects of Global Warming on sea levels). . .turn on your TV right now. Look at New Orleans. Tomorrow is on full display at the 17th Street Canal and the littered Convention Center. It’s there in the 9th Ward rooftop evacuations and the military occupation of historic streets. Global warming, left unchecked, will spread New Orleans like a curse to every community within earshot of waves and tides. (. . .)
One Last Chance
If only we could turn back the clock 25 years and rebuild Louisiana’s marshes and barrier islands exactly the way those lonely activists – warning of an approaching Katrina – had been asking for over and over and over again. If only we could go back just a year or two and at least reinforce a few New Orleans levees. But we can’t go back. The clock has run out. The nightmare has come in full. But for all the world’s other coastal cities, there’s still time. We can avoid the mistakes of New Orleans or at least dramatically minimize them. We don’t need massive new levees right now to protect Miami. We need a rapid global switch to modern windmills for our electricity. We don’t need sea walls to save San Diego. We need hydrogen fuel cell cars and energy efficient appliances and bio-fuels. The Kyoto Protocol is just too expensive for our country to adopt, George Bush says, presumably the same way bolstering the 17th Street Canal levee was once deemed too expensive. We’re now spending billions of dollars and burying thousands of people because of that mistake. How much, in the end, will global warming cost us?
Before and after satellite images:
LINK:
I’ve seen those, and the notation “missing land” on the “after” photo sent chills up my spine. How much land has or will come back, I wonder, and how much will remain missing?
These images really got to me, too.
These are the ones that did me in:
Satellite Imagery: Chandeleur Islands Before and After
“Did me in,” is exactly how it felt to me, too. What is it about those images that pictures of flooded houses in NO didn’t do to me?
I know what you mean. For me, the images of the vanishing islands are like watching Atlantis disappear–with the ocean all around, there’s a feeling that they’re not coming back.
That’s a really great description, RH.
would benefit the environment thousands of miles away. The coast is a bird sanctuary and stopover for hundreds of species. In my mind, we don’t have a choice.
Would you please lend your mind to George Bush?
I think Bush will think we don’t have a choice either. That he has to make hard decisions, and we just can’t afford to spend the money it will take fix the situation.
And, still nothing will be done.
I’m really sorry I won’t have time to participate in today’s discussion. But I do have a contribution. One of my oldest and closest friends lives in New Orleans. Last week she finally went back home. Here’s a couple of images from inside her house. In the first one, the marks on the window show that the house has been checked and has no dead bodies.
The following are some of her thoughts she sent in an email:
Oh, geez,Andi. That’s awful. A friend of mine and her husband returned last week and she, too, describes a strange and eerie city.
Thanks for taking time before you leave to give us the photos and story, Andi.
by this part that came later in her email:
This is kind of scary, though. They could so easily fall into the same trap the Cajuns and other Gulf coasters fell into and be lulled by the everydayness and business of life and also, in their case, the sense of dangerous hope of a better city. . .when we haven’t corrected the problems that could make it happen to them all over again.
Perhaps, but better this than despair that nothing can be done.
Okay, now I really have to go to the airport. Thanks for the great effort you put into this. Have a great discussion.
We’ve heard a lot on the news about the displacement of the people of New Orleans, but where are the bayou people?
The Houma Nation website says that Katrina and Rita left 5,000 Houma homeless. An October 9 Contra Costa (CA) Times article states that about 8,500 Houma were uprooted by the two storms; according to the article, “Many have dispersed to shelters in Arkansas and elsewhere and have not been heard from.”
Apparently many of the areas Tidwell visited took a worse hit from Rita than Katrina. According to the Houma Nation site, during Rita “[t]he Houma communities of Dulac, Grand Caillou, Montegut, Pointe-aux-Chene, and Isle de Jean Charles were inundated with seven or eight feet of water.”
Tidwell’s message will likely have listeners among the Houma. As Michael “T. Mayheart” Dardar writes, “The scope of the devastation has forced us to concentrate on immediate needs of food, cleaning supplies, clothing, etc. but much larger long term needs are on the horizon. The destruction of Katrina and Rita have brought to light the long lasting effects of our land loss and we know that the issues of land and houses will dominate our immediate future.”
As for the Cajun and Vietnamese residents of South Louisiana, I haven’t been able to find out much. There’s a good article here on the effects of the storm on the shrimpers.
But I wonder about Tim and Phyllis Melancon and their extended family in their fragile uninsured camps in Leeville. Could it be that Tim has reason to be grateful now that Tee Tim found work away from the bayous?
I thought about Tee Tim, too, and was glad he was, as far as we know, out of harm’s way. I’m definitely going to try to contact Tidwell and see if he’ll tell us what he knows.
Janet Strange had this comment yesterday, wondering whether the outrage over Denny Hastert’s statement that New Orleans should not be rebuilt would cause people to turn away from Tidwell’s message even though, as Janet points out, what Hastert appeared to be saying and what Tidwell is advocating are different things. I think it’s a very good question.
Clearly, Tidwell isn’t saying we should just throw up our hands and abandon New Orleans (and South Louisiana) as a lost cause. Quite the contrary. I read in his recent statements a firm belief that it’s still possible to regenerate the southern marshlands via the Coast 2050 project–and that this project should be the number one priority in the post-Katrina/Rita budget.
Of course, Coast 2050, even if begun today, would take many years to bring back lost lands. I don’t think Tidwell is suggesting that we wait to rebuild New Orleans until the marshland buffer zone and the barrier islands are restored–he just says that the commitment to the project has to be made first. Presumably, then, in order to make the city as safe as it can be in the short run, the levees would have to be strengthened considerably so that they can meet the threat of hurricanes over the next few years.
Even so, we’ve poured so much more money down the toilet in Iraq than it would take to fund Coast 2050, rebuild a more effective levee system, and assist the stricken people of the Gulf Coast. I’m betting that if there were some way to guarantee that not one more cent would go to Halliburton until funding was approved for Coast 2050, they’d be digging that diversion ditch by 6 a.m. tomorrow.
Also, in yesterday’s BooBooks diary I posted a (bad) link to the America’s Wetland, “The Campaign to Save Coastal Loiuisiana.”
This link should work.
Your link has a good page of other links to news articles about the damage. There’s one from a Baton Rouge paper that talks about the damage to the islands, but claims it’s really no big deal because nature will naturally build the islands up again. I couldn’t quite believe what I was reading. . .knowing how so many barrier islands have already disappeared and haven’t come back, and that even if islands do re-sand, it will take a long time. . .and then I saw it was written by a business reporter. Ah. Of course.
The timing is tricky. He does seem to be saying he wants to hear a commitment first, and make sure that work gets started immediately, but that leaves me thinking that NO and other parts of the coast could fill up again long before the protections are in place.
Yesterday I thought I heard a meteorologist say that hurricanes this late in the season tend not to threaten the LA. area, but that seems scant reassurance to me in a year in which we’re making “new history.” We still have more than a month to go in this hurricane season.
And what would Tidwell say to people moving back to the areas that will never be shielded from hurricanes, no matter what? The South Louisiana bayous, the Gulf shore in Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas, not to mention the entire state of Florida.
I caught a snippet yesterday on CNN of viewer e-mails opining that people who insist on living in hurricane-prone areas shouldn’t expect government help. How selfish and simplistic is that? How about people who live in mobile homes (a/k/a tornado magnets) in the Midwest, anyone who lives near a fault line, anyone who lives on or at the base of a mountain (mudslides), anyone who lives in forested lands (wildfire), anyone who lives along a river (flooding) . . .
Government policies have certainly done their part to leave more and more people at risk from natural disasters. Louisiana is such a glaring example of accommodating the haves (such as the oil and gas industry) while penny-pinching everyone else. A government that refuses to protect its most vulnerable citizens has no right to exist.
To desert my own diary, but I am forced to leave to go see the Robert Redford movie. Hey, he’s an environmentalist!
http://tinyurl.com/e44rg This is a cool link-LA Wetlands-National Geographic. Story linked to front page makes you think you’re reading about post Katrina yet continuing reading you find that it is projection of what most concerned believe will happen-unless something was done to rebuild wetlands etc.
And do I think that any sort of plan is going to emerge to rebuild the Coast and NO the right way and make it a environmental showcase for the world-No. As long as this administration and repugs are in charge of money nothing meaningful will get done(except to line pockets). After all bush put Rove in charge of rebuilding remember.
To make the right choices and having a plan to rebuild the coast or force the government to take rebuilding seriously would mean that the public would have to realize how extremely important this is for the whole country and demand the government have a far reaching and visionary plan to get this massive project done. I don’t see that happening.
I just feel so helpless in a discussion of the aftermath of Katrina and preparations for the next deluge. I’ve erased more comments in this diary than any other diary ever. I’m struggling with feelings of negativity for the future. And I haven’t wanted to stiffle the conversation by whining about it here.
A year ago, I really believed things would be different, that John Kerry, flawed candidate that he was, would be our next president. That as a country we were ready to realign our priorities to something more in keeping with my own values.
Well, the joke was on me, and that didn’t happen at all. It turns out we live in a country dominated by millions of people who, face it, still support George Bush and his policies.
kansas, I’m nodding along as I read Tidwell’s post Katrina’s comments. But how do we get from reviewing his reasoned approach to the problem to actually implementing the radically new solutions that he’s supporting?
How do we find politicians, Democrat or Republican that are able to articulate and implement these ideas?
Too many people in this country just don’t care. I don’t think they care about anything. Maybe they’ve all lost hope. I don’t know. But as long as they’re willing to vote for idiots, how can things get better for anyone?
And how do they have a hope of getting better for people as desperate as the Katrina victims?
I’ll admit I share your pessimism, katiebird.
Is there a baby-step that is obtainable?
Do cities and counties or states have any control over the levy system in their areas?
Can local officals ask for local implementation of these ideas.
And if so, can we target certain localities as likely first steps?