Two women caught in the middle of two very big messes at the same time – both the result of their own arrogance: Judith Miller, irascible New York Times reporter and Harriet Miers, woefully inexperienced Supreme Court Justice nominee. Both are in the headlines every day and the stories behind those headlines keep getting worse. Yet, neither woman has the humility necessary to simply stand up, declare “mea culpa” and just walk away – sparing the rest of us the circus they’ve both created.
Sunday’s NYT has yet another story by yet another colleague of Miller’s, Byron Calame, “the reader’s representative”, throwing even more poisonous darts at her in an attempt to push her out the door. And she deserves to be pushed – hard.
I suspect we’ll see many of these in days to come as the NYT tries to save what little is left of its former reputation thanks to Miller’s stonewalling and self-absorption. Unfortunately, this will continue to be a spectator sport in which the audience members are tied to their chairs, forced to watch as the paper continually flogs itself in an act meant to convince people that, this time, it really means it – it will change. Note to the NYT: we can only take so much.
Meanwhile, Miers reputation is again coming under fire – this time for receiving excessive funds from Texas officials for a land deal she was involved with. This new scandal is sure to keep the media busy for at least the next couple of days.
Harriet Miers needs to withdraw her name from the nomination process immediately. It’s become quite obvious that a person so full of themselves that they would even consider accepting a nomination for US Supreme Court Justice with the obvious lack of qualifications she has places herself above what’s good for the court and the United States. There’s more than enough hubris in Washington to go around these days. Bush commends Miers’ character. That’s only because it reflects his to a tee – take what you want and screw everybody else.
Both Miers and Miller are guilty of the same crime: valuing themselves above all others to the detriment of millions who are affected by their actions. Both are emeshed in scandals. Both have poor defenses. Both will lose in the end. Both need to disappear from the front pages of the newspapers and stop filling our TV screens so we can get on with what really matters: the real business of the people.
Arrogance and the inability to realistically judge one’s own abilities are hallmarks of low intelligence.
Check this out- just skim the paper.
Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html
We might ought to let Miers stew a bit on the hot seat. Her presence causes people to wonder about Bush’s motives big time and that is not so bad. Even his allies have to wonder. And as she is questioned, I get the feeling she will not be able to hold the polish Roberts had. She will show the tarnish of Bush like no one else could. It will be more interesting to see if the idiot dem senators can really learn how to question.
There is another reason to let her stew a bit. First I don’t think she really will come up to snuff in people’s eyes and the repubs will have to jettison her. Second, I don’t want Bush appointing another SCOTUS nominee until after Fitz does his thing. If Bush comes out to be an unindicted co-conspirator then he should not be allow to put forth any more nominees. If only Cheney is an unindicted co-conspirator then it might be harder to press this view, but it might stick anyway, that a criminal administration should not nominate those who might get them off the hook!
Super story, Catnip.
Harriet Miers needs to withdraw her name from the nomination process immediately
Yes, she needs to withdraw immediatelly.
But, oh god, I hope she doesn’t. She is an embarrassment to the entire administration and the Republican party. It’s such fun …
Bush is so damn stubborn, it make take a palace revolt to get him to change his mind. Let’s let that happen…. and it will … even if Bush is too hard-headed to concede until more damage is done, it’ll happen.
I have to honestly say I look forward to seeing Ms. Meirs on the hot seat. All it will take are a few questions about obscure constituional cases ans she will show just how unqualified she is. Pass the popcorn!! This is going to be fun.
She’ll definitely be stewing on the front burner for a while yet and it will be to the detriment of Bushco and her. I’m just saying if she actually had a conscience, she’d bail out.
She doesn’t have clue!
The combination of arrogance and incompetence at the New York Times is breathtaking. Well-schooled high school journalists would have known better, and done better.
But the Times’ public humiliation is only symptomatic of an entire culture that has dumbed down and sucked up to the point of meaninglessness.
If the late Roman Empire had had newspapers, they would have resembled the New York Times.
at teh NYT, worth saving.
Yes, there are a small number of journalists/columnists of note working there, but the publisher and editor are no more than the butt ends of a bad joke…
As Panda said last week, Sulzberger was in on this and forcefed Judy’s reports to the NYT.