I don’t know how much time I will be spending blogging or on the Internet, but I am here now and wanted to share with you a letter that I submitted to my local paper. I hope that it is indeed published by them, I am also submitting it to many other papers in Kansas to spread the word about what the rule of law is for our preznit.
Without further ado, here is my editorial.
The President of the United States recently acknowledged that under our System of Laws, a person is INNOCENT until proven GUILTY. For whom does this rule of law apply? Does it only apply to those who are indicted in this administration? I ask this question because currently there is a US Citizen held by the Pentagon under an order by the President of the United States, who for three plus years has been held without charge, due process or the right to talk to a lawyer or his family. That person’s name is Mr. Jose Padilla.
There will be those who will state, well he is a criminal, a terrorist. That well may be true, yet he is a Citizen of the United States of America. Under our Constitution he is entitled to due process, access to an attorney and a trial. Why is it then that our President states that a member of his Administration is entitled to be deemed INNOCENT until proven GUILTY, but an ordinary member of our society is deemed to have no such right?
“There is no question more important in American constitutional law than the power of the executive branch to subject citizens to indefinite military detention without criminal trial,” Padilla’s lawyers said in court papers filed in Washington.
This is the substance of this letter to the Editor.
Mr. Padilla was arrested at a Chicago airport on May 8, 2002, on suspicion of plotting to carry out acts of terrorism. Our Constitutional procedure under the Bill of Rights, the procedure that has functioned in the United States since the beginning of our nation’s origin, provides Mr. Padilla with a right to be accused with the crime of terrorism. Indicting him, bring about a trial before a jury and providing there is a conviction, sentencing him under accordance with the Law. That is the system; the way the Constitutionally guaranteed criminal justice structure has worked for more than 200 years. These procedures upheld innumerable times by the Unites States Supreme court to insure every American the protections guaranteed by our Constitution.
Mr. Padilla being held by the Pentagon under an Executive order is something so wholly foreign, something so unfamiliar to the American way of justice and life, that it should send shivers of revulsion throughout America. Something that appears to be a replica of the actions engaged in by many of the most repressive regimes of the 20th century. Holding citizens in custody indefinitely without Due Process or access to the court system. It appears that securing a decree from President Bush that Jose Padilla is an “enemy combatant” in the “war on terrorism,” the Pentagon takes the posture that it can thwart the entire federal criminal justice system set up by the US Constitution. Abolishing rights and guarantees that extend back in history including common law and The Magna Carta of 1215. The exclusion of habeas corpus, due process, trial by jury, and right to counsel, are very specific rights engendered into our Constitution by our founding fathers and clearly violates the intent and spirit of our country’s rule of law..
My consideration of the reason that Mr. Padilla’s plight is of such critical importance to the American people is, if Mr. Padilla’s rights to Due Process are not upheld, this authoritarian doctrine will be relevant not just to Mr. Padilla but to all of America’s citizens. I believe the only reason that the President and the Pentagon have restricted the effects of such power to only one American arrested here in the US is understandable on its face: it creates much less awareness from John Q. Public and appears to provide a less viable threat to the American people.
I ask that every American, have no illusions about this unprecedented authoritarian power grab by the President and the Military command structure. If the President’s and Pentagon’s power to arrest Americans for terrorism and detain them indefinitely without federal court interference is upheld by the courts, then the Executive and Military power in America will freely flow into that vacuum created by the loss of our most valuable right, Due Process. Our American way of life will be changed for the worse, perhaps forever. Our lives will be distorted by such power in ways inconceivable by most of us. Not one American will be protected from capricious arrest, including editorial writers, broadcast journalists, government detractors, protestors and nonconformists. Even run of the mill criminals will find themselves held without charge as “enemy combatants”. Any and all Americans, yes I stated all Americans can be deemed an “enemy combatant” and placed into non law enforcement custody by Executive order and will have no remedy through Due Process. Only the pledge “we won’t abuse this power” stated by the Executive branch and the Pentagon, the governmental agencies that are culpable for sinking our people into one of the most disgraceful allegations of torture, sex abuse, and war scandals in our history, but also the resulting suppression of reality based facts.
It has become obvious that we can no longer rely on Congress to stand up for the Constitution and to protect us from this unprecedented impugning of our rights by the President and Pentagon. Congress has acquiesced its Constitutional abilities, its equality to the Executive branch and has remained silent and submissive in its condemnation in regards to the Padilla doctrine and our growing loss of civil liberties, since that tragic day on 9/11. What for me is even more appalling, the relentless submission of Congressional power yielded to the President and the Pentagon, that is perilous to our Liberty. We can hope and pray that the federal judiciary stands up decisively in the protection of our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and the judicial system that has illustriously made our nation the benchmark for others in the world to achieve, resolutely stands up in conviction to the protection of our freedoms.
Most importantly, we must clearly elevate the conscious awareness of the American people to the credible threat that the Padilla policy poses to our way of life. Especially given the high probability that the President and the Pentagon will convince our Congress to grant the Executive branch and Military absolute power over the American people that it has so determinedly avowed in the Padilla case. We must firmly state that America will never allow itself to become a military state, the right of Due Process, is undeniable, that the Constitution is inviolate in its protections to all Americans. Our Constitution has served us ably for these many years, let us not now allow it to become just a quaint notion of what once was, I want my children and grandchildren to live in the Land of the Free.
While the “rule of law” is defined as “the collective safeguard of everyone equally under the law”, President Bush’s “rule of law” appears to denote, “I rule, so I get to decide who gets protection under what laws.” Those protections are denied people whom President Bush deems “terrorists/enemy combatants” or “threats to our national security.” President Bush’s slip of the lip concerning the presumption of innocence, for example, truly must have been bitter consolation to Mr. Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen held without the presumption of Innocence and without the benefits of Due Process since May 2002. I urge everyone who reads this to write to their Senators and Representatives to demand that Mr. Padilla, a US citizen, be granted his Constitutionally guaranteed rights without further delay. It is after all a right that each of us as US citizens is entitled to by one of the worlds greatest living Documents, granting freedom for every American.
allowing me to be a part of your lives today.
for being here today… made my day indeed 🙂
and your words always come from the deepest and truest heart. It is so sad that we have come back around to this in our country – we shut out the violations of our basic rights and pretend they will not come for us. Your letter speaks to what that loss will mean. Thank you for sharing this.
I know when I took my son to China last summer, and told him he could say what he liked about Bush(but to be polite about China) that it shook my Republican Texan mother. Somehow, his free-flowing rants scared her. Well, if they take us to Gitmo, I thought, it is what you want for your security, isn’t it?(Okay, he is probably safe- being six years old and insisting that “Bush tells lies and Bush should go to jail and Bush poops and pee-pees in his pants and wears children’s underwear”)
What is this country, that we felt safer speaking our mind in CHINA? I brought him here, as a fat and happy infant, from China, never dreaming(in those happy days of 1999)that he would face such deterioration of liberties.
I treasure the more eloquent voices, like yours, ghostdancer, who call us to remember what this country can be, at its best.
Nice work Ghostdancer. It’s good to see you today.
I hope all is going well for your campaign, and that you are an effective catalyst for some changes in Kansas.
Beautifully crafted, Ghostdancer.
Quite candidly – and shamefully – I admit that you’ve summarized the reasons I rarely participate in civil disobedience. I’m terrified of being “disappeared”, or having my life destroyed in some other manner by the powers that be.
Back during the marches of September 24, one of the site members from Canada mentioned that they’d be there in spirit, but as a non U.S. citizen, they were fearful of the potential ramifications of participating in the march, and what may happen to them while protesting in another country. That comment sent chills up my spine, and motivated me to think long and hard about what the poster said. It never occurred to me that our government would do anything sinister against a Canadian civilian. (HA!) But I soon realized the writer’s concerns were quite valid, and aligned with my own.
Thanks for sharing this diary, and thanks for your continued activism, Ghostdancer.
I welcome you into my day with an immense amount of joy. Bless you, brother.
Great letter GDW and great to see you here.
Great letter, and it’s so nice to see you here today. I hope the campaigning is going well.
Thank you for remembering Jose Padilla.
A popular high school and entry level college civics project used to be taking the Constitution and/or the Bill or Rights around, door to door, or to malls, and asking people at random to read it and ask them if they thought it should be made law.
Most of the people would say hell no, it is communist/radical/propaganda etc or words to that effect, and would be surprised and embarrassed when informed that it was the US Constitution.
Of course, they don’t do that any more. It’s not considered appropriate to make civics class projects out of the President’s toilet paper.
Hi ghost, nice to hear from you and read your excellent letter. I hope it does get picked up and printed around the state.
Every day I get informationclearinghouse in the mail and right at the top it states daily-Joseph Padilla held without being charged and how long..as of yesterday it has been 3 years and 179 fucken days. What I would imagine even scarier is just how many others have been locked up and locked away that we do not know about?
‘Enemy combatant’..is another one of those made up phrases bushco seems so fond of and means absolutely nothing..but sure sounds sinister and bad doesn’t it.
Rule of law seems more to be that they make up rules and apply them as they see fit to the rest of us.
for letting us read that. It is powerful! You got me curiouser about Padilla, and I found that he hadn’t done anything at all!
.
The whole story at the link is about his appeal to the Supreme Court. The site is consortiumnews, and I don’t know much about them, but the long piece (by Nat Parry) contrasts Libby and Padilla, discusses Bush exempting himself from the law, and McCain’s anti-torture amendment.
Great to “see” you, GDW. All the best.
SO good to read you here Ghostdancer. I so miss your diaries. WHen the right started spewing the “innocent until proven guilty” line I really wanted to vomit.The hypocracy of it all is just so insane. Is this really the same USA I grew up in? My mom, the liberal is spinning in her grave for sure.
By DAVID JOHNSTON
Bush Pardons 6 in Iran Affair, Aborting a Weinberger Trial; Prosecutor Assails ‘Cover-Up’
Six years after the arms-for-hostages scandal began to cast a shadow that would darken two Administrations, President Bush today granted full pardons to six former officials in Ronald Reagan’s Administration, including former Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger.
Mr. Weinberger was scheduled to stand trial on Jan. 5 on charges that he lied to Congress about his knowledge of the arms sales to Iran and efforts by other countries to help underwrite the Nicaraguan rebels, a case that was expected to focus on Mr. Weinberger’s private notes that contain references to Mr. Bush’s endorsement of the secret shipments to Iran.
In one remaining facet of the inquiry, the independent prosecutor, Lawrence E. Walsh, plans to review a 1986 campaign diary kept by Mr. Bush. Mr. Walsh has characterized the President’s failure to turn over the diary until now as misconduct.
Decapitated Walsh Efforts
But in a single stroke, Mr. Bush swept away one conviction, three guilty pleas and two pending cases, virtually decapitating what was left of Mr. Walsh’s effort, which began in 1986. Mr. Bush’s decision was announced by the White House in a printed statement after the President left for Camp David, where he will spend the Christmas holiday.
Mr. Walsh bitterly condemned the President’s action, charging that “the Iran-contra cover-up, which has continued for more than six years, has now been completed.”
Mr. Walsh directed his heaviest fire at Mr. Bush over the pardon of Mr. Weinberger, whose trial would have given the prosecutor a last chance to explore the role in the affair of senior Reagan officials, including Mr. Bush’s actions as Vice President.
‘Evidence of Conspiracy’
Mr. Walsh hinted that Mr. Bush’s pardon of Mr. Weinberger and the President’s own role in the affair could be related. For the first time, he
charged that Mr. Weinberger’s notes about the secret decision to sell arms to Iran, a central piece of evidence in the case against the former Pentagon chief, included “evidence of a conspiracy among the highest ranking Reagan Administration officials to lie to Congress and the American public.”
The prosecutor charged that Mr. Weinberger’s efforts to hide his notes may have “forestalled impeachment proceedings against President Reagan” and formed part of a pattern of “deception and obstruction.” On Dec. 11, Mr. Walsh said he discovered “misconduct” in Mr. Bush’s failure to turn over what the prosecutor said were the President’s own “highly relevant contemporaneous notes, despite repeated requests for such documents.”
The notes, in the form of a campaign diary that Mr. Bush compiled after the elections in November 1986, are in the process of being turned over to Mr. Walsh, who said, “In light of President Bush’s own misconduct, we are gravely concerned about his decision to pardon others who lied to Congress and obstructed official investigations.”
In an interview on the “McNeil-Lehrer Newshour” tonight, Mr. Walsh said for the first time that Mr. Bush was a subject of his investigation. The term “subject,” as it has been used by Mr. Walsh’s prosecutors, is broadly defined as someone involved in events under scrutiny, but who falls short of being a target, or a person likely to be charged with a crime. In the inquiry into the entire Iran-contra affair, a number of Government officials have been identified as subjects who were never charged with wrongdoing.
http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html
It is good to be able to read your work ghostdancer. Thanks for sharing your letter. I will be working on mine to my two Democratic Senators ASAP. Take Care
Many thanks Ghostdancer.
Your writing and presence here elevates our collective consciousness.
and so does yours SS.
because it sums up the pure hypocracy we are confronted with day after day. It sums up the pure meanness and smallness of the current administration who can only think of itself and not the responsibilities that it has for the people it governs. I hope you are published and this goes far and wide.
GDW, thanks for posting your letter. Is always good to see you here. Hugs and take great care. May the great spirits be with you always.