While we ride our moral hobby horses — wondering if we’re getting anywhere — the Michael Browns of the world gallop ingloriously on:
Writes Crooks & Liars, “Fema Brown’s got a brand new bag. Michael Brown gets a job to teach people how not to be like Michael Brown. Amazing!”
Here’s what the CNN link says: “Former FEMA Director Michael Brown, heavily criticized for his agency’s slow response to Hurricane Katrina, is starting a disaster preparedness consulting firm to help clients avoid the sort of errors that cost him his job.”
Uh. Let’s see. If we had a more activist populace — with the activist sophistication of groups in Europe, the UK, and Japan — I’d say we dig and find out who hires Brown’s new company, and put inordinate pressure on them to drop him. And that we threaten to boycott products, if that’s feasible.
But — this gets to me — what in the hell is going on with us, and with this country, that Michael Browns get to succeed while others starve and go homeless, and that Jack Abramoff and his ilk get to operate as successfully as they do? That the Glengarry Glen Roves motor on, getting promotions, makin’ money, travelin’ the world, spreadin’ American goodwiill? And that we let it happen. Oh, there’ll be lots of posts like this about Michael Brown. But he’s been torn to pieces in blog after blog and newspaper after newspaper. But he just keeps truckin’ along. I need someone to explain this to me.
There’s another thing: Brown isn’t going to be selling his wisdom to the government. Brown, reports CNN, is selling his FEMA knowhow (who to call, etc.) to private companies. Since when are private companies in charge of avoiding the mistakes of Katrina?
My favorite — and I say proven — conspiracy theory is that Bush et al. did not mind one bit that FEMA was a failure and let countless people die or suffer needlessly. Bush et al. want every government program to be a failure. That way, private companies can take over and reap billions off a shrinking government bureaucracy. I refer you to my piece from last April, “Dead By Sunset: Kill it, and make it look like an accident.”
Think about it. Think about everything in the government that’s failing and the privatization process that’s seeping in.
They succeed by failing.
We check their falling poll numbers.
But they’re several steps ahead of us.
They’re checking their fattening wallets.
It’s time to review Smedley Butler again. And what he wrote applies to the Katrina disaster as much as it applies to Iraq as much as it applies to outsourcing and the rest …
In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.
How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?
Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.
And what is this bill?
This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.
But that’s all just cannon fodder to the elites and to the poor fools who believe the claptrap of patriotism that the elites sell them on.
I saw that on the news this morning and thought “How the f–k can they report this with a straight face?”
I think it will be very telling when we see who hires his company…probably the US govt, taking our tax money and rewarding the man who was responsible for the mass drowning in NO and lack of disaster relief throughout the Gulf coast with it.
And the outrage goes unreported.
It’s like sports. Teams keep hiring guys to coach who have been fired from other teams. How does screwing up qualify me to get another job? Is it our moth-like attraction to celebrity, famous or infamous? Is it the kitsch factor? I don’t know, but it doesn’t speak well to our standards as a society.
The reason Brown may succeed at this…may, is the reason everyone leaving an appointed or elected position in Washington: connections.
Brown is just the tip of the iceberg, and another aspect as well: rewarding incompetence with monetary rewards, because Brown also represents the greed factor that is in control of our nation. If one could learn to get federal dollars, by consulting with Brown, why not?
So what that his incompetence resulted in deaths.
Probably because he did the job corp america was quite fine with. he saved the rich people and let the poor die.
Office in DC as well:
Source
Cross-posted at DKos.
(This made me angry.)
They’re not impressed … oh well. 🙂 (Hey, Carly Simon is on with Martha today.)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/24/brown.consultant.ap/index.html
Well, he should now have some knowledge about how to avoid appearing unaware. In fact, on this, he’s probably an expert. Very sad.
BTW, Susan, what’s up with the sandwich?
That was the photo that Crooks & Liars put up … i think just because it’s funny … and I suppose because he’s continuing to FEAST amid famine. (Guessing that that’s it.)
The “compassionate conservative” faction of the Republican party is quite skilled at forcing average Americans back in the ugly box.
Torture? “Well, if it will protect my family…”
Civil rights? “Aren’t those just for bad people anyway?”
Wages? “Not if it means more for a tub of Peter Pan.”
Corporate accountability? “My insurance rates will go up, it’ll cost us all more…”
Equal rights? “Same sex marriage and abortion are such divisive issues, we can’t split our party over that.”
Katrina? “We can’t afford to help, have you seen the national debt? Anyway, they should have known better, it’s their problem, not ours.”
Poverty? “You can’t help people who won’t help themselves, welfare makes them more dependent…”
The wedge issues and fearmongering pit American against American, playing to our most selfish survival instincts. And the fact that the so-called “faith-based” are the standard bearers makes me sick to my stomach.
Did you just write that list off the top of your head?
It’s very, very good. Deserves its own spot…. or, if you haven’t the time, let’s add to the list here.
As I trial consultant, I hear things like this every week and they are seared into my brain. And so many more…my heart breaks because these are decent human beings just trying to survive. They just don’t understand the Brownie-go-round, or if they do, they feel too helpless and fearful to do anything about it.
Reminds me of sexual abuse. How female victims respond often by victimizing themselves and male victims respond by victimizing others. In doing so each victim chooses the perpetrators over the victims.
And the best one of all: Better Politicians? “All politicians are liars and cheats.”
run business enterprises. Likewise, businesses shouldn’t perform government functions. Both end up as failures.
Brown is rubbing our noses in it. Sadly he is kicking the dead and dislocated. I’m with you on pressuring any company that hires him.
Susan I think you have a handle on this its a class thing. They pull the strings that they have access to by birth. Then they laugh at us all the way to the bank. They laugh at us as they end estate taxes giving their children the advantages of the wealthy and connected. Brownie is an example of the amount of competence we can expect in this class society. Maybe Halliburton will hire him on as a consultant and he can get some corporate welfare. You can’t keep a pig out of the trough. Brownie makes me sick.
There is an (devastating) article on Dick Cheney by Sidney Blumenthal in Salon.com that begins:
They were illegitimate from day one and what we are seeing now is the harvest of that illegitimacy.
There is another article in last month’s Harper’s entitled “WHAT WE’VE LOST: George W. Bush and the price of torture.”
There’s a quote from Al Gore from his response to Bush’s declaration of the war on terror in religious terms:
Seems he found little support for his statement from either party at the time.
The article explains that the justification for torture is not to extract information that will save American lives, it is to INTIMIDATE THE POPULATION OF IRAQ. […]
Both articles explain the complete moral degredation and the lust for concentrated executive power in the “Cheney administration.” Nothing good can ever come of it. That’s what would shock me now, if Bush/Cheney did something good.
It figures you’d find this, Sybil. You always find the best stuff on the ‘net.
Guess who else found that article?
BooMan should give that piece his touch.
The origins of the neoconservative mindset are generally rooted in early Trotskyite ideology. This was a very “leftist” perspective in many respects, folowing a gemneral path that spoke of equality of the masses and shared ownership of the state’s material assets. (This of course was never really implemented in the communist countries, but the idea was such nevertheless.)
More importantly however, this Trotskyite ideology, despite being “leftist”, was authoritarian in every respect. Shared, participatory democratic process were never apart of the Trotskyite or Leninist structures. Adherents of this ideology thought of themselves as liberal leftists, however, despite the totalitarian nature of their beliefs. They had, as Shadia Drury pointed out in her excellent book “Leo Strauss and the American Right”, an almost pathological fear of what they characterized as “liberal democracy”, because they equated this with Weimar Germany and the enabling of Hitler to rise to power.
Now the neocons are firmly oriented to the extreme right, and yet they’ve retained the authoritarian compulsion from their early leftist heritage. (I’m sure this is a major contributing factor to their craziness and irrationality, the cognitive dissonance alone involved in this aberrant ideological shift seems to have severed many of the tethers that bind rational people to the realms of reality.)
For BushCo, Democracy is an obstacle to circumvent or to otherwise undermine with lies and deception. their bias toward tyranny makes even Nixon and Reagan (almost) look like paragons of democratic thinking.
If you are into the Straussian root of the Neocons, there’s a very interesting debate going on over at Sic Semper Tyrannis. Very interesting.
http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2005/11/habakkuk_onleo_.html#comments
Yes! I caught that discussion when it was taking place, and I’ve even finished reading Habbakuk’s piece deconstructing the expressed views of Shulsky and Schmidt, not to mention the irrationality of the Straussian construct.
It’s so easy to see how the whole Straussian scam appealed to people. The exaltation of one’s own superiority over the masses, combined with the always appealing absurdity that one can create manifest reality through force of one’s desire and belief; a heady combination for those insecure psychopaths and narcissists who need validation in their damaged psyches.
The Straussian cult may one day be seen in it’s true context; a cultic scam on the order of Hare Krishna or Scientology; a massive swindle designed to exploit evey identifiable vulnerability in the human psyche in order to feed the lunatic ambitions and appetites of it’s propagators.
What you said.
The neocons are fascists, not left or right. Wm Pfaff in WHAT WE LOST gives a short history of the neocon fascists in Harper’s (not online) November 2005.
Good old Bertolt Brecht, now is a good time to play his stuff.
My November copy of Harper’s went missing before I got a chance to see it, but I’m hopeful it’ll be found so I can read the article by Pfaff.
On the fascism note, poerhaps the craziest neocon of them all, Michael Ledeen, wrote a book in 1972(?) titled “Universal Fascism” in which he (supposedly) extolls the virtues of the fascist model of government.
I’ve never read the book myself, but even a cursory reading of Ledeen’s insane rants and completely fractured logic quickly shows that the idea of shred responsibility for governance is anathema for him, in line with Straussian cultic model, and with fascism in general.
The fact that creatures like Ledeen and Cheney and the rest of the neocon cult cabal are in high places in government is proof positive that our democracy is seriously damaged.
Thats supposed to be “shared”, not “shred”.
Pfaff’s article in Harpers titled “What We Lost” cam be found on his own website here.
I began to read this article end of October while packing to move, continuing while unpacking in the new house. The “torture” of moving was wiped away by this article on how the US ever came to the point of even debating torture. Imagine it! Gersowich was the first to discuss it publicly right after 9/11 and people like Greenfield and Paula Zahn were in agreement with him. It was astounding.
Dershowitz was very quick to pick up on and embrace the fractured and false logic the Bush gang uses to legitimize torture, and it’s no surprise that a vacuous numbskull like Paula Zahn would echo such insanity.
Whenever tyranny or fascism has moved to overthrow democracies, there is always a point where the regime in power propagandizes the populace relentlessly, first instilling fear of grave threats, then identifying and demonizing the source of those threats. From there it’s a simple matter to for the government to present itself as the solution to this threat andall the people have to do is to give up somne of theirrights and freedoms and suspend some laws so the government can restore order and security.
When the government starts presenting the choice to the public between Law OR Order, rather than upholding Law AND Order, tyranny is not far behind.
And besides, torture’s main purpose is to extract false confessions, to legitimize government brutality retroactively and to further intensify the terrorization of the public in order to make them more obedient.
What a terrific article on Cheney by Sid Blumenthal. A perfect chronicle of Cheney’s diabolical essence and crackpot ideological obsessions, and the machinations of his rise to power.
If anyone in this government should be in a straitjacket, it’s Cheney.
By any set of humanitarian based standards, Brown is a complete failure. However, by the standards of the bush regime and it’s corporate enablers, Brown has succeeded in furthering the erosion of support for the poor and disenfranchised. And this is why he’ll be rewarded through his “connections” in DC.
Had even one single millionaire been adversely affected by Brown’s FEMA handling,, he’d not have been invited to share Albaugh’s new offices in Washington. He’d be shunned copletelyby the GOP establishment and even the Bush regime would denounce him. But because Brown’s ruthless and self-absorbed negligence created the framework within which the “Mammon” worshipper wing of the GOP, (i.e. Norquist, et.al.), can intensify their starategic attack on all funding of programs forthe less fortunate, he is regarded as someone who’s advanced their cause and is thus deserving of a reward, never mind that he’s publicly disgraced and that his helpfulness to the cause oflooting the treasury was inadvertent.
On the broader question of how it is that we let the bums profit while the rest of us get screwed, I think the simple answer is because ur democratic process is seriously broken. We, the simple voters, have little chance of really holding the DC equivocators and deceivers accountable for several reasons, most of which are the result of the system being stacked against us. Due to the vast amount of money in the political arena, we usually find ourelves having to vote for the lesser of 2 evils in large part because name recognition is often as far as the electorate goes in evaluating candidates. concomitatnt with this, the MSM skews perception dramatically by failing to be diligent enough, and skeptical enough, in their coverage of candidates. And of course, with the Bush regime in particular, they have simply found ways to circumvent the demcraticprocess as they’ve continue to amass more and more power in the executive branch.
Most of what is happening politically in our society today are examples of precursors to tyranny. Dumbing down the electorate, dividing the electorate against itself, propagandizing lies relentlessly, rigged voting mechanisms, circumventing statutory processes, looting the treasury, militarizing the country, and rolling back civil freedoms by tricking people into having to choose between law OR order in the name of national security rather than embracing law AND order, (that is, that order must follow the law, not usurp it); all of these things are steps on the road to fascism.
History is replete with examples of “Democracies” undone by such measures, and it seems this Bush gang is intent on enforcing their own totalitarian agenda on us whether we like it or not.
I fully expect a revolution in this country sometime before I croak. I don’t look forward to such a thing because of the bloodthirsty component such extreme measures invariably contain, but I don’t see that enough of us are wiling to change our lifestyles in a dramatic enough way to effectively deal with the realities we face both as a nation and as a human civilization upon the earth.
Which came first the incompetence or the ideology that shelters and encourages it? Can’t balance a budget, great we want to shrink government anyway. Can’t provide people with basics after a hurricane, great we want churches and private enterprise to do it anyway. Its so completely irresponsible and they hide it in ideology. Bullshit, call it what it is stupidity.
Certainly the ideology predated Brown. I probably should have written; “…created an additional framework within which…”, rather than “…created the framework…”.
The tax cuts for the millionaires and billionaires and corporate entities serve 2 majorfunctions; one is obviously to effectively loot the treasury and hand over the proceeds to the wealthy, and the other is to craeate the pretext for claiming that we must cut social programs because we can’t afford them.
Brown’s abominable performance enabled this argument against social program funding to advance in the wingnutosphere around the absurd idea that the poor themselves are responsible for the problems of why social program funding doesn’t work.
with the upcoming bonanza that will be sold as fixing disaster relief by taking it away from the wasteful government and turning it over to its proper managers, the lean, mean private sector. I have no doubt that that is precisely his pitch. Why they’d need him when they already have Cheney is unclear, but the corporate leeches are not known for passing over any opportunity to better their personal odds. Cheney, Brown, Bush and the gang are well into old-age military-business tradition: scavenging valuables from the fallen is just as satisfactory as extracting a profit from their recovery. Welcome to the greatest country on earth.
Yes! It make s perfect sense that Brown himself, being the perfect example of how government might be “unsuited to do a competent job in relief work”, is therefore the best person to deliver the message calling fo the “privatization” of all relief programs through religious-based organizations and private contractors.
Abdicating government’s primary duty to serve the people by privatizing such efforts is the perfect use for an incompetent jerk like Brown. By turning our own citizens into “charity cases” rather than citizens deserving of help from a responsible and responsive government, the Bush regime undoes one more key principle at the heart of any enlightened government, that of serving the people, rather than telling the people “you’re on your own”.
Because they live in an alternate universe from the rest of us.
Have you read Rolling Stone’s article on John Rendon? This is how they see things. This is how they operate. It works great for them – the tiny minority who comprise the true elite.
Unfortunately, I haven’t figured out how to avoid sharing the planet with these people, and they continue to destroy it, many of its inhabitants, and make much misery for those who survive.
The Rolling Stone article is a “must read” for anyone seeking to understand these maniacs and chart a course to neutralize their insane agenda.
This ranks right up there, is just as in in-your-face. as having Ollie North smirking at us from behind the tube on FOX.
Related to cronyism, connections, and how things get done in government, if you haven’t read the Unauthorized biography of George HW Bush, go read it. It’s got some great insights into how we all got in our current mess.
Granted, I don’t know how true it is, the endnotes sections all list reputable sources, but maybe the authors are taking a bit of license. If not, though, it certainly explains a WHOLE lot of stuff.
Curious if anyone who has read it has any thoughts on the veracity of the claims.
Btw, you can check it out here . It’s freely available for download.
i’ve said all along that bushco’s agenda is to eviscerate the government, shred any actual or implied social contract, acquire and maintain as close to absolute power as it’s possible to possess, insure that their money bins and those of their crony supporters are full to overflowing, establish and enforce social control through extreme fundamentalist christian ideology and the lobotomization of civil liberties “required” for the gwot, gut the middle class, rule by fear, and relegate the majority of citizens to indentured servitude… they are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams…
http://www.takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/
Since when is the UK not part of Europe? Let’s see how you react if I write about “the USA, New York and Canada”…
Heh.
That’s a common problem. When Americans talk about Europe we usually mean the mainland (the continent).
It’s not that we don’t consider the UK and Ireland as part of Europe, it’s just that we consider them as different and more akin to us.
It has no political meaning to us, but it obviously does to Europeans.
I know…
You’ve fallen for long running propaganda… from the UK anyway, as I am not sure the irish would be happy to be lumped into that particular sub group… they are part of the eurozone after all.
“Heh!” is probably the best answer…
is that when I think of Europe I don’t think of Scandanavia. Unless we are talking about government policy, in which I case I do think of Scandanavia.
I wonder if UK propaganda has something to do with it. It might. But I think it is probably more related to England’s special relationship with the U.S. We just see England as something that stands alone. But we easily lump France in with Germany and Spain, et al.
Don’t know, it’s an interesting phenomenon. But I tend to use ‘the continent’ to differentiate. If someone says ‘I’m going to Europe’ I just assume they mean the continent, and not England or Ireland or Scandanavia.
Jerome, it wasn’t a conscious decision … i was writing and unaware that it was an issue for Europeans. Now I know.
— just another dumb American