Bush Administration “Breaks the Promise” by Expanding Global Gag Rule to HIV Funding On Eve of World AIDS Day ::::warning, PDF link::::
Washington, D.C. – In a stealth move intended to draw little public notice, the Bush Administration has formally expanded the Global Gag Rule to U.S. global AIDS funding under the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), according to the Center for Health and Gender Equity (CHANGE). The restrictions appear as part of a five-year, $193 million request for applications (RFA) for HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care in Kenya released late Friday, November 18th by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The RFA, entitled, “HIV/AIDS & Tuberculosis, treatment, care and support” references the gag rule twice in stating eligibility criteria, stating that all consortium partners must “agree, to abide by the Mexico City Policy, the Tiahrt Amendment, and all USAID policies and regulations.” (For a summary of the grant see www.genderhealth.org/kenyagrant.php, as well as to find links to the original RFA and related documents).
In August 2003, President Bush released an Executive Order specifically exempting U.S. global AIDS funds from gag rule restrictions. “The theme of World AIDS Day 2005 is `Keep the Promise.’ In expanding the Global Gag Rule to U.S. global AIDS funding on the eve of World AIDS Day, the Administration has broken its own written commitment not to subject global AIDS funds to these onerous restrictions,” stated Jodi Jacobson, Executive Director of CHANGE.
The Gag Rule, also known as the “Mexico City Policy,” denies U.S. international family planning funding to foreign non-governmental organizations that provide safe abortion services, counseling, referral, or information on safe abortion, advocate for changes in abortion law in their own country, conduct research on the effects of unsafe abortion, or otherwise work on safe abortion issues.
The Global Gag Rule undermines efforts to prevent unintended pregnancies in the first place by crippling family planning programs that do so much as collect data on unsafe abortion. It also hobbles efforts to address the toll taken on women’s lives worldwide by complications of unsafe abortion, sexually transmitted infections, complications of labor and delivery, and other leading causes of illness and death among women worldwide. According to conservative estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 600,000 women worldwide die each year from complications of pregnancy and childbirth, of which at least 78,000 women worldwide die as a result of complications of unsafe abortion in a desperate effort to terminate unintended pregnancies. In Kenya, where abortion is illegal, complications of unsafe abortion are a leading killer of married women in their twenties and thirties. The Kenya Family Planning Association lost U.S. funding because it refused to forgo the right to discuss the toll of unsafe abortion on the lives of women in Kenya. “Loss of this funding has severely undermined efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy in Kenya through expansion of voluntary family planning as well as to prevent HIV infections in women,” according to Dr. Godwin Mzenge, Executive Director of Family Planning Association of Kenya.
Women and girls make up 60 percent of those infected by HIV in sub-Saharan hardest hit by the AIDS epidemic, and the rate of new infections is highest among women in their twenties and thirties in most countries of sub-Saharan Africa, and in other “hotspots” such as India. “Given these realities, this shift in policy goes beyond hypocrisy to sheer irresponsibility and complete disregard for the lives and welfare of women and girls worldwide,” asserted Jacobson.
“More to the point, this move will further undermine the ability of reproductive health, family planning and maternal and child health programs to reach women and girls with life-saving information and technologies for the prevention of HIV infection at a time when 5 million lives are being lost to HIV/AIDS every year and when an increasingly disproportionate number of those deaths are among women,” stated Jacobson.
:::snip:::
To some extent, Jacobson noted, the expansion of the gag rule to HIV funding represents a “formal admission” of what the Administration has been doing all along–excluding family planning and maternal and child health programs from U.S.-funded HIV prevention efforts. Field research by CHANGE has shown that since 2003, family planning organizations in Botswana, Kenya, Namibia, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda have been outright denied funding under PEPFAR due to confusion about the application of the Global Gag Rule and due to the rush by this Administration to fund “faith- based” groups, shift prevention funding to abstinence-only programs, and otherwise undermine effective HIV and reproductive health programs. The deterioration of basic family planning services and their inability to respond effectively to the needs of their clients for HIV prevention was a key concern identified by the 22 representatives of 6 PEPFAR focus countries that attended a meeting held by CHANGE in Kenya in September this year.
Make no mistake about this people. This is a death sentence for poor African women and men and others around the world. Next time you shake the hand of anyone who helped put George W Bush in office, be sure and thank them. But wear gloves — their hands will be covered in blood.
for more information under this week’s “under the radar” rethuglican action go here: Center for Health and Gender Equality.
This was originally posted at Our Word in Reproductive Rights, Week in Review, Nov. 20-26
so basically, women’s health clinics that talk about reproductive rights can’t get HIV prevention funding. nice. given the many the social stigmas around discussing female sexuality, if women can’t talk to their health clinic about hiv prevention, i guess they are just SOL. and who said george bush doesn’t care about black people?
Moiv sent me the link to the story.
Thanks are due to her. She’s the best, don’t you all think? I know i do.
Yes, she is ,thank you moiv.
Moiv had just posted a few thoughts of her own on this matter at Dkos. here’s the link to her post. I recommend everyone go over and give it a read and please rate her up.
Bush in Kenya: Killing Them Softly
Here’s the correct link.
Bush in Kenya: Killing Them Softly
is that so many family planning clinics in rural areas are part of the only full-service health care providers for miles around. In remote areas, some people must walk for days to reach them. And these clinics are already so poor in funding that there’s certainly no money to establish separate health care facilities for just one type of care.
So when those clinics are forced to close, it isn’t only family planning and/or HIV-related care that suffers — the people of the region lose it all.
But the effect on the women of Kenya has been horrific: the Birth of a Crisis
TMI 😉
Too much reality, maybe. But all of it is way “too much” for me.
Bush the Bloodthirsty. Women, the poor…likes picking on people who can’t fight back.
I’m sure you already know this (and deserve a round of thanks for spreading the word) but others might like to know that I got a note from the Lilith Fund saying that because of the great response to their financial needs, they will be back providing support next month.
Lilith’s hotline will reopen on December 15, a full three months sooner than they had estimated when I got the call that they had been forced to shut down.
To everyone who helped make that happen, consider yourself hugged. As one of my friends at Lilith said, “YAY!!!” 🙂
I don’t believe in a literal hell. But for things like this, I want to believe there is one, because I want that man to suffer forever.
That’s exactly how I feel Kidspeak..and another word I don’t like to throw around is evil but his continuing gag policy and himself pretty much sums up evil for me.
and what are the deaths of some poor women in poor countries compared to keeping the support of the far right and their “culture of life”?
What else is there to say? I hate these fucking people. Condemning women to die, just because.
Faith-based policy on a global scale–religion for your resources. Oldest damn trick, and yet…
Meat for the base, nothing more. Remember that a lot of fundamentalist theocrats believe that AIDS and HIV are punishments from God for sinful behaviour.
Faith based Genocide
Here is another variation of the same I wrote months ago where condoms were actually REMOVED from circulation in Uganda…
There’s nothing about the Bush regime’s policies in any arena that has anything to do with real spiritual faith-based principles or values. These creatures are so morally and ethically bankrupt that it should be a crime for them to claim status as human beings. (Needless to say the same applies to the evangelical fascists who corrupt every spiritual teaching they’ve ever come into contact with.)
They are the lowest life form on the planet.
I really hope this diary makes it to the front page here and gets picked up around the blogosphere. It’s a very important story and it should bve shouted from the front page of every newspaper in the country.
so does this mean he is saying” We are contributing millions of dollars to prevention of aids, but no one qualifies to recienve it?
I’m thinking it’s going to be set up more as “We were PREPARED to earmark millions for AIDS prevention. However, since none of the potential recipients were willing to give up the best tools to work with OR spend that money buying drugs from our friends, we’ll just cut out the middlemen and give the money directly to our friends instead. Running those little clinics to help the, well, you know, THOSE people… just a pain in the ass anyway. Not profitable. They’re better off dead anyway.” (Those last few lines courtesy of Babs.)
Exactly. Human Service workers are expendable too. (See post downthread.)
They’re saying we’re contributing millions of dollars to prevention of aids but your program isn’t qualified to receive any if you also provide reproductive services to women we don’t approve of.
Here’s an article from Nairobi that deals with a proposed U.N. fund, The Millennium Development Goal (MDG) Fund, that illustrates the U.S. position. This proposed fund isn’t an HIV fund, its a reproductive rights fund, but the article gives insight into the United States position.
It’s called compliance criteria. Devil’s in the details. (The power of a faceless bureaucrat!)
Nailed it! All social programs that are in existence have their eligibility criteria so strict that it is impossible to qualify. So, the programs exist on paper and are the first to be gutted in the state budget, as the funding is reallocated to balance the state budget! And that is in a state w/a “democratic” (DINO) governor!
So which Republican lobbyist do we need to launder these funds through in order to actually use them?