by Larry C. Johnson (bio below)
As a diehard Redskins fan, I am well versed in denial. And the same can be said for our erstwhile Secretary of Defense and most of the media who cover him. Consider today’s spectacle at the Pentagon as Rumsfeld insisted repeatedly that things are going well in Iraq and only getting better. Best of all, according to Rummy, Iraqi military and police forces are growning stronger each day. He said it so it must be so.
Only one problem–he said it before. Let’s go back to October 2003 when Rummy asserted,
In less than six months we have gone from zero Iraqis providing security to their country to close to a hundred thousand Iraqis. Indeed, the progress has been so swift that … it will not be long before [Iraqi security forces] will be the largest and outnumber the U.S. forces, and it shouldn’t be too long thereafter that they will outnumber all coalition forces combined.
So, what did Mr. Rumsfeld say today?
the Iraqi army now has eight division and 33 brigade headquarters in operation, compared with none in July 2004, while the number of Iraqi army’s combat battalions has grown to 95, compared to five in August 2004.
What in the world was he talking about in 2003? …. keep reading on the flip …
A division consists of about 15,000 troops. Fifteen times 8 gives us 120,000. A battalion can be as large as 1000 men. So Rummy is claiming that there are 95,000 Iraqi combat troops as well as 120,000? But in 2003 Rummy claimed the Iraqi Army was close to 100,000. Which is it Don? Let’s give him the benefit of the doubt and assume the Iraqi Army is actually closer to 120,000. Are we to believe that the US has only succeeded in recruiting an additional 20,000 soldiers for the Iraqi Army since October 2003? And the media, by and large, are either too lazy or too stupid to hold Rumsfeld accountable for these delusional moments. I guess, with the holiday parties upon us, they don’t want to get disinvited to the White House Christmas Party.
How long must we endure such delusional thinking? Remember, when Rummy made the October 2003 bold prediction the number of American dead was less than 400. Now we are closing in on 2200 and no “light” at the end of this tunnel. Just because Rummy wants a functional Iraqi Army does not make it so.
But it gets worse. Not only is Rummy off base on the number of troops actually able to operate independently, he refuses to accept the madness these troops are carrying out under the new Iraqi banner. In Rummy’s world there are no abuses by the current Iraqi Army. Yet multiple sources confirm that the Army, which is comprised primarily of Shia fighters, is targeting and murdering Sunni Iraqis. Let’s not forget that the Ministy of Interior is running, with US acquiesence, a secret detention center where more than 150 Iraqi men and children are being tortured. We’ve created a Saddam like regime without the control and order imposed by Saddam. Great!
We have not seen this level of hallucination by a Secretary of Defense and a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff since the gory days of Vietnam, when then Secretary of Defense McNamara and MACV Commander General Westmoreland claimed the Viet Cong insurgency was drying up. The Tet offensive in January 1968 forced that little fantasy to get a taste of reality.
Fortunately, a more accurate picture of the true readiness of the Iraqi Army has been provided by James Fallows in this month’s Atlantic(subscription required). Some of the folks interviewed by Fallows noted that:
“The current situation will NEVER allow for an effective ISF [Iraqi Security Force] to be created,” a young Marine officer who will not let me use his name wrote in an e-mail after he returned from Iraq this summer. “We simply do not have enough people to train forces. If we shift personnel from security duties to training, we release newly trained ISF into ever-worsening environs.”
“A growing number of U.S. military officers in Iraq and those who have returned from the region are voicing concern that the nascent Iraqi army will fall apart if American forces are drawn down in the foreseeable future,” Elaine Grossman, of the well-connected newsletter Inside the Pentagon, reported in September.
“U.S. trainers have made a heroic effort and have achieved some success with some units,” Ahmed Hashim, of the Naval War College, told me in an e-mail. “But the Iraqi Security Forces are almost like a black hole. You put a lot in and little comes back out.”
The problem we face is that the number of so-called Iraqi troops may be growing, but they are largely Shia and identify more with their religious group than a psuedo national identity. As a result, they will be effective in killing Sunnis, insurgents and civilians alike, and the insurgency will continue and will likely escalate. Meanwhile, our troops are caught in the middle of an expanding civil war.
It is time that the American people demand a Secretary of Defense who is in touch with reality and capable of asking tough questions and hearing unpopular answers. Given Rummy’s age we can’t rule out dementia. But such a diagnosis is of little comfort to the U.S. soldiers who are being chewed up in the streets and sand of Iraq.
……………………………………………………..
Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm that helps corporations and governments manage threats posed by terrorism and money laundering. Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism (as a Deputy Director), is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management. Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC’s Nightline, NBC’s Today Show, the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world. Further bio details.
Personal Blog: No Quarter || Bio
Recommended Book List || More BoomanTribune Posts
Rummy’s denial cannot be truly matched by a poor Redskin fan. I’m 38 years a Lions fan. That is denial. “We really got a shot this year.” “Well, this year, we could do it.” Rummy is clearly on the denial level with a Detroit football fan.
At least the Lions had the sense to fire the coach on Monday. Would that we, the people, could fire this administration.
Boston,
You’re right. On the denial pain scale the Lions take the cake. Also, the Other Lisa ain’t getting no additional Christmas present this year, the Skins gave the Chargers her gift. LOL :))
Now removed to the oblivion of censorship, an on-line letter to the editor of the Princeton Alumni Weekly once contained the following:
I heard on the grapevine that Larry owes a Giants fan a cigar for last week’s game.
And that Giants fan owes me a cigar for the Seahawks beating the Giants in OT this past Sunday.
(Ugh .. i hate cigars. Oh well. It’s the gloating that matters.)
For all the good it does to question Rumsfeld, (or McClellan or Cheney or Rice, etc.), the press might as well be interviewing a tape recorder.
Sorry, Larry…I had to say it!
Rumsfeld’s position is simply so awful and the war in Iraq such a mess that I am almost at the point of denial in paying attention to it, purely to keep my sanity. Rumsfeld with his twin Cheney are Satan. How much more hand wringing can a person do. Watching what was the best army in existence be misused and ground up in a mission that can’t be done is dreadful and very depressing.
May lightning from a clear blue sky strike Donald Rumsfeld down!
He also said Iraq wasn’t and ‘insurgent’ state.
I take him to town over here.
“Given Rummy’s age we can’t rule out dementia. But such a diagnosis is of little comfort to the U.S. soldiers who are being chewed up in the streets and sand of Iraq.”
Perhaps I have a faulty memory but I seem to recall congressional testimony by joint chiefs of staff of few weeks ago indicating one ` Iraqi’ battalion was ready to operate autonomously….so imho these sudden proclamations by rummy’s, rice, et al, that these capabilities have exponentially expanded, reflect their concern that in the current U.S. msm climate, there is some risk that the lid is can be totally blown off on that oil thingy related to the Iraqi constitution and negotiations with multi-nationals to allow for substantial foreign control of Iraq’s oil. Re: the latter: This Belfast Telegraph article is a reprint of and article published in the Independent by Philip Thornton on November 22nd Iraq’s Oil: the Spoils of War: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=670335 and here’s a link to the report referenced by Thornton: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2005/crudedesigns.htm
Thoughts?
In September 2005. General Casey told congress the Iraqi’s had 3 battalions, of which only 1 was competent. When Bush gave his first 2005 “Stay the Course” Iraq war speech a couple of weeks later, that number had magically changed to 80 battalions.
Of course once again the evil twins (Cheney and Rumsfeld) have “contacted out” the training, so there is no REAL accountability.
One solution, might be to have Wes Clark, and some of the generals the evil twins forced into early retirement for speaking truth to power, actually meet and talk with the returning Lieutenants, and actual solders from Iraq in PRIVATE. Then have these same more trustworthy people go to Iraq. NOT talk with the evil twins hacks in the green zone, but instead don flack jackets and helmets and go ouy and actually SEE what the hell is going on. Then, and only then. will we get some kind of accurate assessment.
I’d love to know how much of OUR “contracted” tax money has been used to enrich Cheney and Rumsfeld portfolios both in this country and off shore.
Monday: You have the third or fourth largest military in the world, depite war after devastating war, and absolute control over the populace.
Tuesday: Your country is overrun and the military cashiered.
Wednesday: The occupiers linger because of the impossibility of establishing a self-sustaining military force.
What changed?
And please, let’s not start comparing degrees of humane conduct. Or comparative civil rights. There are women listening.
Apparently most of the cashiered military decided RPGs and roadside bombs directed at the US Army was in their best interest. I’m not sure why. Other than knowing by hindsight that standing down their army was a mistake, I have not heard many details of where those guys went. I suspect most of them joined a local militia and started fighting a civil war.
That was an army drawn disproportionately from the Sunni minority population.
The claim that we have to impart something, or that we have something to impart, is a substitute for the real reason we are there, and the real reason we don’t share power. Not that I know what the reason is, but I am sure it isn’t the necessary delays in creating an internal security apparatus in Iraq.
What changed was deBaathification, with all the experienced officers members of the Baath Party.
It takes a lot longer to train officers (and support troops) than it does to train infantry.
Then there was the head of procurement for the Iraqi army who essentially embezzled about a billion dollars earmarked to supply the Iraqi army and disappeared with it. He probably got his training in the oil-for-food program. It was a good job of laundering funds and hiding them. The Iraqi army was left with mostly junk. The Independent has the story, and I commented in my own blog Politics plus stuff.
The waste and de-Baathification don’t account for the absence of progress.
It isn’t credible to say that this is about disappointing numbers; it’s about veiled understandings on two or more sides that the effort is for show.
With a militant disorder spreading from neighborhood and blood rivalries, there is a fundamental dispute about what constitutes policing.
Progress at the NCO and Officer positions will be slow. You can’t train good sergeants and company grade officers in just a year or two.
A lot of the problem is that the Iraqi military has had a shortage of weapons and vehicles, and the vehicle they do have are unarmored. Then they don’t have trained supply and maintenance people. Those skills take a minimum of three years to get a journeyman trained. Battalion Command and Staff officers and their sergeants then require a very different and more time-consuming training and socialization.
Essentially the Iraqi army right now is walking infantry. They need U.S. support to go anywhere. Aviation and Engineer support are all U.S. functions also.
I also don’t think the Bush administation wanted to train Iraqis in the first place. They are really only just now getting serious because they have finally admitted to themselves that they can’t do everything with the limited U.S. troops they have.
Of course, after we draw down to about 60,000 or so troops, mostly support troops, the civil war is going to heat up and you are going to see the Iraqi military fragment as they decide which tribe they support. It’ll be a bit like the U.S. military in 1860 as each individual decides which side they are going to fight for.
Why is it that none of the “numbers” this administration ever gives us are right? I am thinking here of the total Iraqi dead. Last fall it was 100,000 and now a year later that number still stands. Hmmmm…guess they stopped counting the dead and puffed up the number of Iraqi troops. Effing liars.
Rummy and Baghdad Bob
Sorry, I don’t do pictures, just concepts.