In “Did Bush plan to Bomb al-Jazeera?” at Salon, Juan Cole presents new “evidence that Rumsfeld considered the Arabic satellite station’s reporting to be a form of murder.”
As JPol wrote here in his “Bush V Al-Jazeera: Fact or Fancy?,” linked by Juan Cole on Nov. 29 as “a detailed and very valuable timeline”:
… a leaked memo quoted yesterday by the London Mirror alleging that President Bush told British Prime Minister Tony Blair that he “planned to bomb Arab TV station al-Jazeera … demonstrates that this pre-existing agenda has its roots at the very top of the Bush administration, and that a major escalation of that operation was being contemplated.
Cole points out that “Rumsfeld himself had telegraphed the strategy during an interview in 2001 on … Al-Jazeera!” Thankfully for us, Juan Cole is a regular viewer of Al-Jazeera. Although the tape is missing from DOD archives (hmmm…), it was found and reaired by Al-Jazeera Monday. Cole watched:
… it contained a segment in which Rumsfeld defended the targeting of radio stations that supported the Taliban. He made it clear right then that he believed in total war, and made no distinction between civilian and military targets. The radio stations, he said, were part of the Taliban war effort. (Salon)
Cole has another new story at a new blog:
My article on Rumsfeld’s complicity with Saddam Hussein when he was using chemical weapons is at Truthdig.com, a new site, the force behind which is veteran journalist and truth-teller Bob Scheer.
It’s great news that Juan Cole has hooked up with Scheer’s blog. As you probably know, progressive columnist Bob Scheer was fired by the Los Angeles Times in early November.
In an interview with Amy Goodman on Nov. 14, 2005, Scheer said that he believes he was fired because of his politics and his vocal opposition to Bush and the Iraq war:
I had been the subject of vicious attacks by Bill O’Reilly and Rush Limbaugh. Sometimes Bill O’Reilly would sometimes go after me every day, and this went on for the last couple of years, and I’m still standing. I was a punching bag for those guys. I’m still standing, and the people who run the paper collapsed. And the big issue here, I think, is that the publisher took over the editorial pages, a guy named Jeff Johnson. He’s an accountant from Chicago, doesn’t know anything about what newspapers are supposed to be about, and he made a decision to get rid of the column. It had run as a column — I had worked at the paper since 1976, but the column had been running for 13 years, and I think it was a strong column, criticizing the war when the paper was supporting it.
And even as recently as last week, my last column, which I’m quite proud of, was on the Defense Intelligence Agency report that Senator Carl Levin released last week, and I wrote about how in February 2002 they knew there were no ties between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, that the key witness was a phony. This was released. Eight months later George Bush went before — spoke just before the Senate decided its decision and at that time knew that the key witness for this, really the only witness they had, was a phony, yet went and lied to the country. That column last week broke that news for the readers of the Los Angeles Times that the paper neglected to cover in any serious way. So, you know, it’s very disappointing.
The only other fact here that I would throw in, the paper is concerned about what the Bush administration thinks, because the Tribune Company bought the Times Mirror Corporation and now owns a television station, a very profitable one, in the same market in Los Angeles as the newspaper. And next year they have asked — they have to get a waiver in order to be able to do that, because that violates the law right now. They expected Congress — when they bought the property, they thought Congress would pass that law allowing them to have those two major outlets in the same market. It is now illegal, and in 2006 they are coming up for a waiver, and the Bush administration’s F.C.C. could easily deny that waiver to them. … Read all. (Emphasis mine.)
I’m glad that Scheer is stepping into the blogosphere, and that he is attracting fellow bloggers like Juan Cole. His blog site is very attractive, and highly readable. I wish him the best. God knows we need more voices like his and Juan Cole’s — as well as JPol, and so many others here. His site’s motto is:
Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.
—A.J. Liebling
We own one. Don’t we. Rummy can’t bomb and arrest every one of us. (Although they could take over the ‘net, and that’s a worry of mine.)
As I read through this post I had three different but related thoughts. I am encouraged that many in the country who supported Bush, have come to view him as untrustworthy.
I am discouraged by my growing concern over the role the MSM played in the lead up to the war.This story just adds fuel to that fire.When the media is concentrated into a declining number of corporations to the extent that it is now, the public interest is not served. The last six or seven years of our history demonstrate this most clearly.
Finally, with the declining legitimacy of the collective contributions of the MSM, we fortunately have the rise of the blogosphere. I’m sorry the Los Angeles Times chose to fire Mr. Scheer. At the same time I am delighted that such an experienced journalist has started his own site. We need as many of him as we can get. There is a large vacuum to be filled, if the citizens of this country are going to have access to information that has not been bought and paid for.
Yes. My friends in L.A. are upset, but were very heartened by Tim Rutten’s column the other day. It’s a media column, and he wrote a powerhouse essay.
I have seen Al Jazeera. it’s really very conservatinve now where near as liberal as Democarcy Now! or even NPR!. They should watch it. It’s just like CBS news, it’s hardly radical at all.
They are mad because they don’t take their orders from Israel. Al Jazeera shows footage from Iraq showing the effects of the war. That’s all there is to it.
Maybe I am missing something. But it looks very professional and very conservative. Just like American news in it’s presentation.
http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage It was very disheartening when LATimes fired Scheer but not surprising given the atmosphere in the MSM(including newspapers)to avoid too much real reporting.
The link to aljazeera online is always worth checking in daily to see what they are printing and so far it seems to me to be as balanced as any paper here-not some great big boogeyman by any means.
The story of bush, rumsfeld only seem to show how paranoid they are and certainly prove they can not abide anyone disagreeing with them at all…to say nothing of foregoing more Geneva Conventions-do they even pay lip service to GC anymore?
Then again we have been rated something like 36th in having a free press worldwide…which to me basically means no free press…at least 30 some other countries have been deemed to have more freedom of the press than we do..which really is beyond disgusting isn’t it and scary.
We were rated 44th for press coverage in this country and 137th for press coverage in Iraq. Combining the scores puts us in the 26th percentile. You can’t even get into Journalism school with that rating.
At 44th we sit one notch up from Bolivia (where we are trying to control their Natural Gas) and one notch below Macedonia. The link is here:
http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=554
of Scheer’s termination — I was wondering in the back of my mind why I had not seen any of his columns in the SF Chronicle (they frequently picked him up for their op-ed page).
Have bookmarked the blog, and will probably check it frequently…it’s the new definition of the Free Media; if you don’t toe the party line, you’re free to be unemployed…
Thanks for the heads up on Scheer’s site; it looks good at first glance. The LAT has really lowered themselves.
I like Cole’s piece because he reiterates that what’s happening today in Iraq can’t be understood without accounting for US actions & policies over the past three decades. Along similar lines, I was re-reading that old PeaceNik Ramsey Clark’s (who arrived in Baghdad to advise, if not formally join the SH defense team) Demonize to Colonize yesterday, where he reminds of the essential fact: