You’ve Gotta Fight, for Your Right, to have a REAL Party — Liberal Street Fighter
It is easy, here in the land of the Personality Cult and “There is no ‘I’ in team” and office environments plastered with motivational posters to blame the system or our “leaders” for the sorry state this culture festers in, but that is too simple, a cop out. How easily we forget, or run away from, the idea that this is a government of We the People …. David Sirota sums up the real problem:
The disease is simple to understand: It leads the supposedly “ideological” grassroots left to increasingly subvert its overarching ideology on issues in favor of pure partisan concerns. That may sound great at first glance. Democratic Party officials always talk about a need for “big tent unity” and subsequently try to downplay ideology. But as a trait of the grassroots and not just the party, Partisan War Syndrome could be positively devastating not just for issue advocacy, but also for Democrats’ political aspirations as well.
Remember last year, when so many of us (myself included) found ways to look past our values, our disappointment, our disgust at the Democratic Party’s fecklessness? Remember the way you made your peace with yet another shitty candidate, a candidate who lived down to all of our worst fears? Remember how everybody blames Nader for Gore’s loss, instead of Gore’s lousy campaign and all of the Democratic voters who’ve long since stopped demanding a responsive and representative party?
Sirota is right, and it would do us all a world of good to take his insights to heart.
Certainly, this disease can be difficult to detect. The mainstream media regularly portrays the so-called Democratic base as a highly ideological, “liberal” or “progressive” monolith, supposedly pressing an insulated, spineless D.C. Democratic establishment to move to the “left.” This portrayal creates the image that there really is a cohesive, powerful ideological force on the left, one that is committed to convictions and issues before party-much like there is on the right. This image is reinforced by the mainstream media’s constant characterization of Internet blogs and the “netroots” as an extension of this monolith-as if a medium automatically equals an ideology.
It’s an easy story to believe, and it is hard to accept that we’ve all stepped away from our responsibilties as citizens:
And it is a straw man. To be sure, there used to be a powerful ideological force on the left that constituted the Democratic Party base. And there are still remnants of that ideological movement left in various progressive labor, environmental and civil rights organizations, and disparate Internet blogs. But look no further than the 2004 Democratic presidential primaries to see that the ideological movement as a whole is in tatters. In that race, primary voters – supposedly a representation of this “ideological” base -supported John Kerry on the basis of his personal profile as a Vietnam War veteran and his supposed “electability.” It was the most non-ideological of choices in what we were supposed to believe was the most ideological of races.
This blunting of the left’s ideological edge is a result of three unfortunate circumstances. First, conservatives spent the better part of three decades vilifying the major tenets of the left’s core ideology, succeeding to the point where “liberal” is now considered a slur. Second, the media seized on these stereotypes and amplified them – both because there was little being done to refute them, and because they fit so cleanly into the increasingly primitive and binary political narrative being told on television.
And third is Partisan War Syndrome – the misconception even in supposedly “progressive” circles that substance is irrelevant when it comes to both electoral success and, far more damaging, to actually building a serious, long-lasting political movement. This is the syndrome resulting from the shellshock of the partisan wars that marked the Clinton presidency. It is an affliction that hollowed out much of the Democratic base’s economic and national security convictions in favor of an orthodoxy that says partisan concerns and cults of personality should be the only priorities because they are supposedly the only factors that win elections. It is a disease that subverts substance for “image” and has marked the last decade of Democrats’ repeated failures at the ballot box.
We’ve made politics just another hobby, another game, the same way we talk about chart position instead of songs, weekend box office instead of plot and direction, box scores instead of the poetry in motion of a good play. Surface without heart, that’s the modern American way. This is why the right is beating the shit out of us, why they are destroying our country … we aren’t fighting them. Not really. To really fight requires passion and heart and the willingness to risk all to fight for a better world.
To be sure, it is impossible to paint a picture of the entire “progressive” base in one stroke. After all, the base is not just a monolith (regardless of what the media would like you to believe). There still remain some institutions, pundits, blogs and grassroots power organized specifically around ideology and issue positions. But a quick glance at some of the most prominent “liberals” on newspaper op-ed pages or at a small but growing segment of “progressive” blogs makes clear that, unlike on the right, efforts to strengthen an ideology on the left face a clear roadblock with the advent of Partisan War Syndrome.
“Liberal” columnists write with little sense of an overarching ideological umbrella. A cadre of bloggers and blog commenters increasingly give and take away their support for candidates based on questions of political tactics and “profile,” not issues. The left’s emerging new ideological infrastructure still at times seems afraid to openly push the Democratic Party to embrace more progressive themes.
It is in the heat of debate that we find solutions. It is in open primaries and contentious elections that real consensus can form. Without passion from the left, the blinkered retrenchment in an imagined past, instead of a joyful embrace of a future of our own design, will continue to dominate our politics.
Why should this be troubling to the average progressive? First, it is both soulless and aimless. Partisanship is not ideology, and movements are not political parties – they are bigger than political parties, and shape those parties accordingly through pressure. As much as paid party hacks would argue otherwise, the most significant movements in American history did not emanate from the innards of the Democratic or Republican Party headquarters, and they did not come from groups of activists who put labels before substance: They spawned from millions of people committed to grassroots movements organized around ideas – movements which pushed both parties’ establishments to deal with given issues. Without those movements transcending exclusively partisan concerns, American history would be a one-page tale of status quo.[…]
This is why resisting Partisan War Syndrome and doing the hard work of rebuilding an ideological movement is both a moral imperative and a political necessity for the left. A grassroots base that is organized around hollow partisan labels rather than an overarching belief system – no matter how seemingly energized – will never defeat an opponent that puts ideological warriors ready to walk through fire on the political battlefield. If we do not rekindle that same fervor about actual issues on the left, we will continue living in a one-party country, losing elections into the distant future, and most disturbing of all, watching as our government serves only to protect those in power.
Be prepared to resist bad candidates if they are opposed to your values, even if you have to withhold your vote to do so. Work hard for good candidates, but if partisan manipulations make real progressives unavailable, then WITHHOLD YOUR VOTE. If a shitty scion of a political family is going to help take away your reproductive freedom, refuse your support. If a corporate whore is only to willing to protect corporate bankruptcy while taking away the same from working people, leave that place on the ballot blank if you have to. Remember, without your vote, they don’t have jobs, and would you hire somebody who you knew was going to do a shitty job for your own business?
Do not buy the bullying that you have no choice. Politics is eventually about what we value as a people, about what we want to BE as a people. Do you really like what you see now when you look around you?
Most often the people happen to be Democrats, but it’s about what they stand for, not who pays for their campaigns.
The Democrats who sold out the people in the Bankruptcy bill, for example — do they automatically deserve our votes? Just one example.
We scoff at people who vote against their interests when voting Republican. So why should we do the same? If the candidate is wrong, he or she does not get my vote, period.
And this is all the more important in the primaries. Speaking for myself, I have no time for the king craft of a meritless crown.
Any way to give a “10” for this comment?
I’m going with the 10 as well. Here’s a 6 to go with the 4.
The politicans and MSM count on the voters to maintain party line support so they can exploit it.
This situation is more than dire we at a life or death intersection. What I find vile about the pre-postering of the DLC/NDN crowd is that they are PURPOSEFULLY using fear of the GOP to usher in their own agendas. I saw with my own eyes that these people would have preferred Bush to win than their own “PARTISAN” candidate Howard Dean.
Partisan only when it suits them if not then they proclaim “bi-partisanship” is better than sliced bread and that some of their best friends run RedState.org.
If you have seen the film “The Pianist” if you haven’t rent it.
What was clear was that their were no absolutes. People who the pianist thought he could trust betrayed him and those he was certain would kill him saved his life. Yes, the Nazis were the “bad guy” but there were a hell of a lot of non Nazi who were “bad guys” too.
One particular scene still haunts me. All the jews of a particular area where rounded up in a “holding” area. The piano player gets a “job” in a bar run by jews who are collaborating with the Nazis. The Jewish “owners” are sitting around drinking and counting their windfall of cash gained by working with the Nazis. They are so deluded in thinking that they will be saved if they collaborate that they are put in charge of oppressing the Jews that want to rebel. We all know the end …they were ALL taken to concentration camps regardless of their “loyalty”.
This is what I think about those willing to toss overboard constituencies of the Democratic Party… they are just trying to save their own asses. But in the end these fools do not understand that WE WILL ALL LIVE in a fascist society.
What was sobering about this film is that the pianist seemed to have the “right” demographic to survive. He was male, well liked and talented, but he showed that it was the sacrifices and actions of the so called RADICALS who fought to the death not that of those collaborating getting rich off of the Nazis that eventually changed the course of the war.
So every one has a CHOICE to make… To collaborate or fight.
It is time for people to put their vote where their mouth is… other wise as Rev Al says we’re just “Talking Loud… Saying Nothing”.
sadly, I think it will take more losses, both of elections and of freedoms, before so-called liberals learn this hard lesson.
I’ll agree that too often we’re faced with candidates who are “opposite sides of a counterfeit coin”, but that doesn’t equate to leaving a ballot blank. If you don’t like the annointed ones (your obvious reference to Casey), find and/or support a different candidate.
I’ve personally had it with “party”. I’ll support a candidate directly, but will not send any contribution to a national organization. That structure is too rickety, too cumbersome, too slow, and entirely too vertically integrated to be of much use.
If the big “D” democratic party truly wanted to “open the tent”, they would use the tools they have to actually communicate with their members. Long past time for a series of national referenda on a variety of issues. (Friend of mine used to say “a trivial task for a competent programmer”).
Been saying for years the new construct is horizontal. At least the leadership could Act like they understand.
The only thing that’s trivial to add to a program is bugs.
However, that’s not to say that these things aren’t worth doing. Just that it’d be a mistake to think of them as trivial.
Tongue planted firmly in cheek. That same friend described the four stages of computer security as:
Anything less is a downgrade.
Hah. Your friend has his head screwed on straight.
Good piece Madman…
not much to add right now except the quip I always respond with to the “there’s no I in team”…
Yes, but there is a ME. 😉
I just realized that team spelled backwards is meat… do you think is means something…;-)
“There’s no I in ‘Buddhsm’.”
It’s not as if the Democrats have nothing to say in contrast to rapacious Rupublican capitalism.
“Since 1995, Abramoff and two law firms where he was a partner collected more than $7.7 million from the Northern Mariana Islands.
He lobbied to keep Washington from cracking down on the island’s garment industry where workers are paid $3.05 an hour, well below the federal minimum wage of $5.15, to work in what critics say are sweatshop conditions.
The workers, many brought in from China under less-restrictive immigration rules than in the U.S. and most of its territories, produce garments that are still stamped “Made in U.S.A.,” thanks, in part, to the efforts of Abramoff and DeLay.” SweatshopWatch
If Democrats campaigned on principles of justice, fairness, equality, equity, shared burden, you know, the stuff America is supposed to stand for, against callousness, exploitation and greed, yes, we’d lose the votes of the the me-firsters, but they will always vote Republican anyway.
Remember John Edwards’ “Two Americas” ?
” …we still live in a country where there are two different Americas…
(APPLAUSE)
… one, for all of those people who have lived the American dream and don’t have to worry, and another for most Americans, everybody else who struggle to make ends meet every single day. It doesn’t have to be that way.”
I still cry when I think about that speech, because my heart is broken, and I hunger for a homeland I can be proud of again. I am sick with shame that I live in Tom DeLay’s America.