My favorite Journalist at the WaPo Online, Dan Froomkin Asked a great question the other day:
When was the last time that Bush spoke in a forum open to citizens who are representative of the diverse array of views in the country?
and the Answer is scary:
not since last October’s presidential debates, and not often before then, either.
Consider that for a second.
It has been more than a Full year since the president put himself in a position to even potentially hear a dissenting viewpoint, or a complaint about his leadership.
But the Bubble by itself isn’t news anymore. Thanks to Froomkin and others we’ve known about The WH’s manipulative efforts to create pretty pictures for the evening news while vigilantly protecting W from the dangers of dissenting viewpoints, unhappy citizens and disagreeable bumper stickers for sometime
What is news is that the Bubble around the president has shrunk severely recently. He’s having a harder and harder time finding loyal crowds to speak in front of and his team is running to safer and safer locations
Here’s how bad its gotten:
During last year’s campaign, White House advance teams began screening audiences at Bush events to insure that only supporters were allowed in. After the election, that policy gave way to a new, “invitation only” approach, in which tickets to so-called public events were distributed largely by Republican and business groups. Now Bush is in phase three, where almost everyone he appears before is either on the federal payroll or a Republican donor.
And He’s not exaggerating. Consider W’s most recent public appearances:
President Bush’s safety zone these days doesn’t appear to extend very far beyond military bases, other federal installations and Republican fundraisers.
-[today], Bush gives a speech on the war on terror — at the United States Naval Academy. Then he attends a reception for Republican party donors.
-[Yesterday], he visits a U.S. Border Patrol office, then attends a Republican fundraising lunch.
-[Monday] he spoke at an Air Force base and a Republican fundraiser.
-Before leaving the country on his recent trip to Asia, Bush made one last speech — at an Air Force base in Alaska
-A few days before that, he spoke at an Army depot in Pennsylvania.
-When he delivered a speech on Nov. 1 about bird flu, it was to an audience of National Institutes of Health employees
SO lets review: He’s now speaking infront of a) paid audiences who will expect to be paid back. b0 People whose paychecks he signs, and who he can fire at will and c) People who face jail time/ dishonrable discharge if they aren’t nice to him.
I believe this is more from necessity than choice. As his poll numbers have made like Greg Louganis on the 10m platform; it’s become impossible to find enough fantatic supporters without obvious mental defects and/or Drooling issues. Consider what happened the last time they tried a “phase Two” approach:
The last speech Bush gave that was not explicitly controlled by the White House was in downtown Norfolk on Oct. 28. It wasn’t exactly a random group. About half the crowd was in uniform, and more than 70 military members sat on risers on the stage behind him. But some tickets were available to the public through the local Chamber of Commerce.
The result: Bush got heckled. As Tamara Dietrich wrote in a column for the Hampton Roads Daily Press: “[A] man stood up in Chrysler Hall, yanked open his shirt to expose his ‘Dump Bush’ T-shirt in full view of shocked members of Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network seated nearby and cried, ‘War is terrorism! Torture is terrorism!’ before he was hustled out by security people.
Not exactly the warm fuzzy visual they were looking for.
Gone are the days when his advance team could hand out tickets to local loyalists and party chairmen and ensure giant crowds of Cheering, worshipful, Glassy-eyed supporters; but not anymore. Those Stepford crowds have simply ceased to exist. W’s most precious commodity was the Blind faith so many on the right were willing to place in him. It seems like at long last that well has dried up.
What makes this Story so remarkable is how the President himself seems utterly untroubled by this reversal of fortune. It begs the question how much of the real situation he truly understands. This is s not the first time a President has been so unpopular with the American people that he barely dared to venture outside the Whitehouse, But it may be the first time the President himself is unaware of this fact. Consider What a Defense official told Seymour Hersh recently :
Four decades ago, President Lyndon Johnson, who was also confronted with an increasingly unpopular war, was limited to similar public forums. ‘Johnson knew he was a prisoner in the White House,’ the former official said, ‘but Bush has no idea
Can this really be so? Can W really be so far gone that he doesn’t even recognize his own tricks as illusions anymore?
I’ll leave you with the same question Dan Froomkin used to open his article:
What does it say about the president of the United States that he won’t go anywhere near ordinary citizens any more? And that he’ll only speak to captive audiences?
By the way, anybody know where we left our copy of the 25th Amendment?
Were they ever really his tricks and illusions? And how did they get him to form a tear in the corner of his eye today?
You know, the more they isolate him and the more strident his message becomes, like today, the more I’m reminded of John Paul II’s fear near the end of his life that Bush could be the Anti-Christ. He’s on a mission alright. It just isn’t a mission from God.
I listened to a good portion of his speech on the radio today. The host of the show remarked several times that the audience didn’t look too happy. Even when they were applauding.
Talk about a shrinking bubble.
Thanks for putting this together.
One view I have had about Bush from his very first campaign was that he was a paper-cutout.
Listening to Reagan in his last debate with Mondale, hearing him ramble on about some road in CA, I realized that we had a president who was nothing but a “reader”/visual aid. Reagan’s whole second term, someone else was running the country, IMO.
Then a few years ago, Molly Ivins wrote about the change in the Republicans running in TX. She noted they didn’t want to govern, but to RULE. They weren’t playing politics – no comraderie, no compromises.
And then we got Bush. And we got a bunch of Republicans following the TX model. (And Dems joining in!)
My fear is that Bush, the paper-cutout, is going to saddle us with Alito and change this country forever.
I am wondering now how many idealogues/neocons are in Congress? How many mainstream Republicans are there – ones who do politics with some sense of following the constitution? How many are watching Bush, following his poll numbers, watching his audiences – both at “public” functions and at Republican fundraisers, and distancing themselves? How many can be affected by public outcries and actions? Can they be brought to oppose Alito?
Not even lifetime appointments can endure forever, but I do agree the the Alito fight will define our generation and the next one to come. One surprising thing you learn in Law school, is despite public appearances, the Supreme Court bends over backwards NOT to have to Change laws and get involved in politically charged cases (called the Doctrine of Restraint). But even with all those safeguards they end up have a huge impact on the direction of our country, particularly when it comes to protecting the rights of minority viewpoints.
What I fear is that there is a major Progressive backlash brewing in this country that will sweep Democrats into power just as conservatives solidify their hold on the High Court. If that happens we are going to have a replay of the pre-Lochner era Court where Arch-conservatives were so activist in striking Down FDR’s initiatives that he damn nearly packed the Supreme Court in retribution (which in hindsight would have been a Phyrric victory at best)
If the Court loses its “moral authority” and become viewed as one more partisan tool, then we’ve lost the greatest mechanism we have for the protection of individual liberties, which of late have been an endangered species anyway
This creates a possible major problem for the Democratic party in 2006: Republicans running against Bush, while the Ds push candidates (like Casey) who will attempt to move as far towards Bush as possible.
But hey, who cares? We’re capturing moral voters, right?
and Meanwhile, Republican Senator Arlen Spector may be our best hope of blocking Alito’s nomination.
What a world we live in eh?