Thought I’d provide you with some grafs of an article from the Guardian. The article largely reinforces Duranta and blksista’s excellent diaries (more below the fold – updated to fix broken “nerdified link” – yes Ductape Fatwa coined that phrase):
The waters have receded but the mainly black, low-income citizens of New Orleans are now the victims of rising rents, forced evictions and plans that favour the better off, reports Peter Beaumont
[…]
Miss Mildred’s piano lies where the water knocked it down three months ago, amid ruined photographs and clothes. Her favourite chair is jammed in a corner; the wooden tiles of her tiny clapboard house muddy and peeled loose. There is nothing to salvage from a thrifty, industrious life, so she has come to see her home in New Orleans’ devastated Ninth Ward for one last time.
‘I don’t have anything to come home to. No food, no water or electricity,’ said the 74-year-old, whose family has been scattered. ‘I can’t afford to live in the French Quarter and there is nowhere else to rent. I have three more years on the mortgage to pay for this.’ She will not sell the property, she says, but she also will not return. And Mildred W Franklin is angry. In a city where the wealthy areas are buzzing with reconstruction, her neighbourhood, one of the worst affected, is silent and ghostly. ‘They want us to be disgusted. They don’t want us to return.’
She is not alone in thinking this. When Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans it was the city’s poor – almost exclusively African Americans – who were left to fend for themselves as the city drowned in a lake of toxic sludge. Now, three months on, the same people have been abandoned once again by a reconstruction effort that seems determined to prevent them from returning. They are the victims of a devastating combination of forced evictions, a failure to reopen the city’s public house projects, rent gouging and – as in the case of Mildred – a decision to write off whole neighbourhoods.
They are victims too of a reconstruction effort that, while its funding remains stalled in Congress, and lacking proper leadership, has been left to the care of the private sector with little interest in the city’s poor. As a rapacious free market has come to dominate the rebuilding of the Louisiana city, it has seen spiralling prices and the influx of property speculators keen to cash in on the disaster. The result is one of the most shocking pieces of urban planning that black and poor America has seen: reconstruction as survival of the wealthiest.
Sitting in the back of the pick-up truck of union activist Jim Prickett, Aaron is on fire with anger. A young black man in his twenties in dreadlocks and a Veterans for Peace T-shirt, he flares out at all around him. ‘My grandpa died at the airport [during the evacuation]. Now me and my mama can’t get into our home. There is a notice on the door. If we try, we are looting. Do you understand how that must feel?’ he shouts. ‘Do you understand? I live how I can. It has jumbled me up here,’ he points to his head. ‘It is genocide and ethnic cleansing. It’s the return of Jim Crow.’
Aaron’s anger is not unique, although a crushed sense of depression is more common. It is fuelled by the suspicion among the city’s dispersed poor that what is happening is nothing short of an attempt to redraw the city’s demographics and gentrify it. It is a suspicion fuelled by widely reported comments from senior administration and city officials that in the future New Orleans, which once had a population that was 65 per cent black, will no longer look that way. Alphonso Jackson, President George Bush’s Housing and Urban Development Secretary, is one of those who has predicted a change in the ethnic mix of the Big Easy. ‘Whether we like it or not,’ he told the Houston Chronicle, ‘New Orleans is not going to be 500,000 people for a long time … New Orleans is not going to be as black as it was for a long time, if ever again.’
There’s more where that came from. Hat tip to fellow Okie Subjective Scribe.
