[promoted by BooMan]
The following is a post co-signed by a bunch of folks working on the Chuck Pennacchio campaign, but I also wanted to share it with the Booman community as well as we all want more transparency and better candidates…
Last week Bob Casey’s campaign asked, “Who owns Rick Santorum?” The answer is, the same people who own Bob Casey. Have a look at this.
These PACs have given a lot of money to Bob Casey: Cozen and O’Connor PAC, Delaware Valley PAC, Genesis Healthcare Corporation PAC, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham LLP PAC, PH&S Federal PAC, Reed Smith PAC and the Tercenary Fund.
The same PACs bankroll Rick Santorum. But wait, there’s more!
Bob Casey takes money from JazzPAC. Sounds like Dave Brubeck and Sonny Rollins formed a political action committee, doesn’t it? Actually, it’s Exelon, Northrop Grumman, SmithKline Beecham, Koch Industries, General Electric, and a bunch of others. Casey also took money from Narragansett Bay PAC. Must be environmental. Sure looks like a J. Crew ad. Nah, it’s General Dynamics, SmithKline Beecham, Ernst & Young, Raytheon, General Electric, Bank of America; is this starting to sound familiar? And then, there’s Ameripac. Can’t you just smell the apple pie cooling? Well hold your nose; it’s Harrah’s, Tropicana, Bacardi, MGM Mirage, Time Warner, the New York Stock Exchange, General Dynamics, Bell South, Clear Channel; the list goes on. And that shadowy 527 group that Casey “exposed,” Americans for Job Security? Their biggest donor is the American Insurance Association, which gave money to CHRISPAC, which gave money to Casey. And this is just the tip of a nearly half-million dollar iceberg.
Santorum or Casey: take your pick. Either way, you get the same people and the same lame excuses for prolonging the war, blocking universal health care, and undermining our fundamental rights. Either way, it’s bridges to nowhere, pay raises for legislators, and defense contractors plundering what’s left of the US Treasury. Either way, Pennsylvanians lose.
Supporters sometimes criticize Chuck for refusing PAC money. If PACs only offered endorsements, we wouldn’t mind. But would they ever endorse both opponents in the same race? Of course not. This isn’t about free speech; it’s about buying influence. And if you think the Democrats are better than the Republicans, have a look at this. Casey and Santorum take hundreds of thousands of dollars from dozens and dozens of PACs that promote the same special interests over and over. Those special interests expect value for money, and they get it.
The Courts won’t stop this. Legislatures won’t stop it. And George W. Bush certainly won’t stop it. But we can stop it. We outnumber them, and we stop this legalized graft by supporting campaigns and candidates who fight for our interests and don’t take PAC money. Legalized graft will end when campaigns like ours take down campaigns like theirs.
On May 16th 2006: Choose Change; Choose Chuck. Please share this information with your friends using our forwarding feature. Their email addresses will not be collected.
We’ll have more next week.
Best wishes,
Julian, Stephanie, Sabra, Dan, Liz, Albert, Danie, and Dave
Oh, this is brilliant work. Thanks so much. I’ll spread it around.
thanks for posting this here, Albert.
figure this out:
The Casey campaign has an ad here at BooMan (probably a BlogAd) talking about some sort of “secret backer’s ad” for Rick Santorum. But when it’s clicked on, it just goes to a blank page on the Casey website — the basic page template’s there, but no other information.
Wazzup with that? Is this just some way to lure people into clicking and provides them with some sort of phony site visit stats?
Personally, I think it sucks, and as an amateur web designer, it’s very poor practice to advertise something without delivering. If they really have this info, they shouldn’t go “live” with the ad until the site’s ready.
Thanks for the important info on the backers of Casey’s campaign — sounds like they’re trying to play both sides of the fence…
Yep, that’s part of the campiagn we’re talking about when we wrote:
Last week Bob Casey’s campaign asked, “Who owns Rick Santorum?” The answer is, the same people who own Bob Casey.…
I just clicked on it and it lead to the page that’s been up for a week now with a comparison of two ads the Santorum [evil evil evil!] campaign allegedly put together or had involvement with.
Regardless… hypocrites.
Odd…I just get a blank page…maybe it’s a Firefox problem, in which case the Casey web team is even more idiotic — you’re supposed to test your site in as many browsers as possible, and with the growth of Firefox over Micro$oft Internet Explorer, they’re in danger of losing some eyeballs…
so must be a Firefox issue (at least Firefox for Mac) — still a pretty shitty job of site testing IMNSHO…
i’m on FFX 1.5 and it works fine. do you have flashblock installed?
and no Flashblock — I do have Adblock, but the rest of the site seems to work fine; I get the same error (blank page) when I go to that section from the main Casey page too. Weird…
Very informative post and many thanks. Follow the money seems to be the primary route for anyone seeking to discover manipulative political influence.
Given that the Repub party seems to be organized around policies that support the best interests of about 10% of the population, and the Dem party, (as currently constituted), seems to stand for the best interests of about 20% of the public, we the people, by and large, are just getting screwed from all sides.
Wehave tostop electing these duplicitous self-serving hacks, even if it means partisan electoral losses occassionally. DLC type Dems like Casey and Biden and Bayh and Clinton are just not different enough from the Repubs to be meaningful for us in the long term.
IMHO.
Most of our politicians aren’t much better than theirs on issues that matter (though the republicans are thankfully kicking our butts on outright criminal behavior). We need to find better leaders, or get the huge amounts of non-public financing out of politics, whichever is easier.
I’d love to see publically financed elections.