Did anyone catch this one?
The Bush Administration is considering
ways to speed FOIA responses, conceding that there is “suspicion” his administration is too security-conscious
and there have been complaints by news organizations that
that too much is withheld
under the Freedom of Information Act, possibly under the guise of national security.
continued below
President Bush was expected to sign an executive order later Wednesday to improve public disclosure under the federal Freedom of Information Act, White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.
Specifically, this change would require every federal agency to
designate a senior official as the chief FOIA officer, who must take a close look at the agency’s FOIA programs and come up with a plan to improve them.
Why come up with a plan? Why not just release the information/documentation requested under the FOIA?
McClellan answers that by the following explanation of the plan, stating that the FOIA process is
“citizen-centered and goal oriented,”
McClellan further states that this executive order will
improve the disclosure of information to the general public”
It gets better! McClellan continues by saying
“The Freedom of Information Act has been an important way for people to obtain information about their government.”
Ironically,
it was unclear whether Bush’s order would reverse a 4-year-old directive from then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, issued shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, that restricted access to information.
And,
Ashcroft reversed a Clinton administration policy that urged federal agencies to resolve FOIA requests by erring on the side of releasing, not withholding, government information.
It appears that the reversal of the decision that was made by Ashcroft appears to loosed the requirements that were previously set by the former Attorney General. However, after a careful reading of this, is it possible that the Bush administration is further trying to restrict media access to information by merely establishing another procedural hoop for one to jump through?
Devil’s in the details!
Yeah. I think this might have something to do with the big rush to pass the Patriot Act renewal, too. I just found some info that I missed or forgot in that the ACLU had to sue by FOIA to get results from FBI reports that are supposed to detail how the P/A act has been used so far. It looks like the FBI is dragging their feet so it won’t come out until after the renewal.
another thought: who would the senior officals be? would they be subejct to appointment and confirmation?
(thinking uncomfortably about a certain supposed “journalist”.)
The way it reads, it appears that an existing agency official will take the role of responsibility for that agency. Looks like they can decide within their own system.
It may not matter if Ashcroft’s reversal of previous more open policy isn’t changed back.
Old George is good at all flash and no substance.
Decisions w/in their own system are worthless, according to what I know about the social service regs in MI. It is my understanding that everything is based soley on procedural bullshit, as opposed to the substance of any complaint, let alone an appeal. In other words, all the i’s have to be dotted and all of the t’s have to be crossed. If there is a legit complaint and paperwork is filled out incorrectly or a day late because “someone” could not locate a particular form, the person filing the complaint/appeal is sol.
I’d bet dollars to donuts this is pure window dressing, and that if anything changes about FOIA requests, it will be to simplify denial of the requests.
Can I have a donut if you’re right? I’ll bet you are.
The BushCo won’t do anything to compromise their secret society.
Sure. If you’ll let me buy them at Krispy Kreme. Yes, I know the cat cutter has owned some of their stock. But they were the best donut in the world before Frist was out of diapers. They still are.
I’m prone to compromising otherwise solid integrity for Krispy Kreme doughnuts. I feel safe in knowing that at least he doesn’t own all of their stock.
I want one too!
You got that right! Gee, I wonder how they’ll justify that one?