This is the continuance of the religious wars here in Florida, to put it quite bluntly. This has to be the most pious, most arrogant letter I have ever read from the legislator.
The story begins when the University of Florida gets real and offers health care provisions to domestic partners.
The story continues when the local paper writes an editorial praising the University of Florida for doing this.
Here is that editorial below the fold. It was intelligent and open-minded, unlike the response of my legislator.
When the University of Florida’s trustees, with just one dissent, agreed last week to offer healthcare benefits to domestic partners, their purpose was not to open a new front in the cultural wars. They were simply following the lead of many other reputable universities and major corporations across the nation that have decided to deal with the reality of American life in the 21st century.
The reality is that for all of the political furor over same-sex marriages and the so-called “gay agenda,” Americans are increasingly choosing to lead lifestyles that do not necessarily conform to political, ideological or religious orthodoxy. Many of those who do so also happen to be talented scholars and creative employees who are highly sought-after by business and academia, and who, therefore, can pretty much “write their own ticket” when it comes to career options.
The offering of benefits for same-sex or unmarried domestic partners is a concession in business and higher education that society is changing and that the work place must change with it.
I commend The Lakeland Ledger for this great editorial. Usually they are a big part of the real world. Most of the reporters are, anyway.
But yesterday this letter to the editor was printed that I had to read several times. I could not believe the arrogance of it, and the utter pious BS it contains. It is from my state legislator, John Stargel…and he should hide his head in shame.
I have watched our women’s rights being undermined, and I have fought it as hard as I could. It is not popular to do that at some Democratic forums now, but many of us still do bring it up. I feel like when they come for one of us, they soon come for the rest in one way or the other.
Rep. Stargel: Leave Partner-Benefit Issue To Elected Officials
The Ledger believes that the elitists who sit on university boards have been handed the responsibility of determining “reality” in our world. The University of Florida trustees have voted to offer health-care benefits to domestic partners and, according to The Ledger, they were “simply following the lead of many other reputable universities” and “decided to deal with the reality of American life in the 21st century.”
The Ledger went on to cite “courage” in these actions and called opponents of the decision “ideologues,” and stated that politicians who believe this way are living in an “alternate reality.”
Then Stargel goes on to say he is working with his fellow legislator to pass a law to prevent the University of Florida from providing this health access. He is imposing his religious beliefs through legislation, and this is not ok.
If the “real world” is as The Ledger defines it, then either this legislation will fail or the voters will respond in a manner that reflects their collective values. I serve at the will of the people and will accept that decision.
…..”The Ledger’s editorial staff should, therefore, respect the democratic process and not elevate the actions of an unelected board of trustees above the will of the elected Legislature.
REP. JOHN K. STARGEL
District 64
He is convinced he speaks for all his constituency, but he does not…not by any means. He and his staff do not live in the real world at all.
In explanation, I wrote this information up in a diary here yesterday, but I was very angry. I rewrote it this time with less anger and less personal experience with this guy.
Don’t you just love it when they resort to name-calling? “elitists” and then take for themselves the power of elites to strike down the actions of another independent board or commission. Hypocrisy of the first water!
I got a sermon from his aide. I got a sermon on abortion and how gays need to choose another lifestyle.
I was so angry. I called her back and told the next time I called I did not want to be preached to.
She did not have a clue what I meant, not a clue. It is so natural to our GOP lawmakers here now to couch everything in religious terms. They think it is just fine and dandy.
I saw something (now I can’t remember where) that was linking gay rights and abortion, that it was morally suspect to give an excuse of “fairness” as a reason to not fight the gay agenda, because that’s supporting abortion. I can’t remember what the “reasoning” was. Gah. Was that aide linking the two?
This is the same legislator who got upset with a judge who allowed a 17 year old to get an abortion. The judge said she had met the criteria listed in the abortion notification law and granted her the right not to have to tell her parents.
This legislator vowed he would fix the laws so judges could no longer “misinterpret.” I had a diary here about it.
He is very pious.
Sigh. I suppose I shouldn’t expect real logic from homophobes. It’s easier to sound pious about abortion … and ignore the anti-women aspects. So it’s not surprising they’ve found a way to make it a pretense for anti-gay hysteria also.
I’m sorry you have to be “represented” by such a creep and he gives you so much agrivation.