Munich, the new film by Steven Spielberg is a disconcerting experience, intentionally. The director mixes fact and fiction to make a story ‘inspired by real events’, read that to mean it’s not factual in many places but the drama suggests the deeper truths. On that basis the film is successful. I saw the film last Friday and wanted to let the film sit for a few days before writing something. The film is quite moving in places and is much more understated than Spielberg’s previous works would suggest. My biggest criticism of his earlier work is he has a tendency to underline the emotional moments but here he thankfully holds back.
The film chronicles Israel’s response to the killing of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics. We follow Avner (beautifully played by Eric Bana in a career making performance) as he is drawn into this web. Leaving his family behind on a mission that may take years he gathers with 4 other agents in Europe to track down the Palestinians responsible. This is not factual as there were separate teams sent out on many missions but Spielberg condenses this for dramatic effect.
As the death count begins to mount the cracks in the facade of what these men are doing slowly begin to show. What begins as revenge and patriotism becomes debilitating to these men. This is wishful thinking as sadly most Mossad agents believe they are doing God’s work as Israel is essentially a religious state. Munich is told from an Israeli perspective and the reason this film is more balanced than one would expect is because it is being told by someone respected in the Jewish world community and not from inside the Israeli community. We do get a sense of the Palestinian perspective in a few scenes that do get the viewpoint across. This is the best statement we are going to get within the large budget Hollywood filmmaking community on this subject, and that is not a criticism. The film is a good one and while there is much more to say on the subject of Palestinians and Israeli’s by the independent and European filmmaking community, Munich deserves a wide audience.
The main reason this film is valid is that it speaks eloquently on the broader themes of revenge, nationhood and homeland. The lessons discussed and learned in Munich are universal. In more than one scene we see other governments and their spies and other underground revolutionaries intersecting. It is a rare moment indeed in cinema to see such things and see them well done. This is a film (like Brokeback Mountain) that people will be talking about, check it out before you’re told too much in advance.
Hi Wilfred..as always I look forward to your movie reviews here.
Thanks so much to you both! Film is my passion and it’s so nice to be able to write about this art form on the blogs.
I’m trying to compile a Year End list this week and will put it up soon. There are also a few other year end releases I haven’t seen yet (like Cache) that have a political content.
That’s a wonderful idea and will be looking forward to that very much. I adore movies but usually have to wait until they are out on dvd. So did you ever play the Silver Screen Edition of Trivial Pursuit?
i haven’t played TP in years. I wonder how I would do with the Silver Screen edition, my mind is like a sieve!
I did pretty good at it although when it came to any horror movie questions I was fairly lost. Such fun though.
Thanks so much, Wilfred. I’d decided not to go because it’s Spielberg, but perhaps …
however, years and years ago, a TV mini-series was made. I watched it a few years ago on the Encore channel.
From what I’ve read of Spielberg’s film, he depended heavily on that mini-series’ script.
I tried to find the IMDb info on the mini-series, but can’t remember enough to look it up. But I hope that those scriptwriters got some compensation from Spielberg.
I was feeling the same way before the reviews came in (i hated War of the Worlds) and have been disappointed in many of his recent films.
This film proved to me that he still has it in him if he’s properly motivated. I think you would find the political content interesting as well as the dramatic elements. But if you’re Spielberged out, i can understand!
Well as far as I’m concerned half the problem was Tom Cruise…he just can’t act to my way of thinking. He’s a ‘star’ not an actor.
i couldn’t agree more.
.
New Spielberg Film “Munich” Ruminates Over Retaliatory Tactics Against Terrorism ◊ by AZnomad
Sat Nov 5th, 2005 at 01:51:54 PM PST
My comment — Counter Terrorism :: Israeli Response
Countering Terrorism: The Israeli Response to the
1972 Munich Olympic Massacre and the Development
of Independent Covert Action Teams
by Alexander B. Calahan GS-12 Graduate Class
Master of Military Studies – April 1995
≈ Cross-posted from my diary —
Rendition of Carlos the Jackal from Khartoum ≈
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼▼▼ READ MY DIARY
so Avner was indeed a real person and not a composite?
Is there a place in the film (preferably in the opening credits) where Spielberg makes it clear that he is telling a story that is fictionalized and where characters and events have been consolidated?
I ask that because so many times people take away from such films, or TV shows, the belief that what they’ve seen is “true” and use that as their bases for future assessments of whatever issue has been covered.
This is not an issue I’ve followed closely and I don’t know a great deal about, so I would be inclined to take at face value the story as presented. I may or may not see this movie, but know I will know, thanks to your comments, about the elision of fact and fiction.
good question.
if i remember correctly it says ‘inspired by real events’ which lets you know it’s not entirely factual.
There is no way to know for sure because you’re dealing with Mossad and the highest level of the Israeli government during Golda Meir’s time in office. It does say it is based on the book “Vengeance” which was written in the 80’s i believe.