“Watergate was a kindergarten picnic,” Cedwyn wrote here in a diary on January 3rd.
“Desmund Tutu,” continues Cedwyn, “has said that America’s current political climate reminds him of Apartheid South Africa.”
[Desmond Tutu speaking] “It’s unbelievable that a country that many of us have looked to as the bastion of true freedom could now have eroded so many of the liberties we believed were upheld almost religiously.”
…”I had naively believed all these many years that Americans genuinely believed in freedom of speech. [But I] discovered there that when you made an utterance that was remotely contrary to what the White House was saying, then they attacked you. For a South African the déjà vu was frightening. They behaved exactly the same way that used to happen here–vilifying those who are putting forward a slightly different view.”
Reported Amy Goodman today about Tom Delay, George Bush, Grover Norquist, and Ralph Reed’s good buddy Jack Abramoff, a racist if there ever was one:
A 1995 investigation by Newsday revealed that Abramoff helped run a think–tank called the International Freedom Foundation.
The organization was set up in 1986 and its goal was to improve the white South African apartheid government’s image in the West while demonizing Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress as communist tools.
The Newsday report also quoted sources saying that the South African military helped finance the 1988 movie “Red Scorpion” which Abramoff wrote and produced.
The movie was a sympathetic portrayal of an anti-communist African guerrilla commander and loosely based on Jonas Savimbi, the Angolan rebel leader who was an ally of both South Africa’s apartheid government and the U.S government. (DN!)
And that proud label, “Made in the U.S.A.”? … continued below …
From “Forced Abortions & Sweatshops: A Look at Jack Abramoff’s Ties to the South Pacific Island of Saipan & How Tom DeLay Became An Advocate for Sweatshop Factory Owners,” today on Democracy Now!:
BRIAN ROSS (ABC News Investigative Reporter who appeared on DN! today]: Well, it’s interesting to watch this unfold because the man behind the scenes in every case was Jack Abramoff.
In the footage we had on World News Tonight last night showing DeLay arriving in Saipan. He’s wearing a funny-colored floral hat and is greeted by a man in a beard who’s Jack Abramoff. Big bear hugs all around. And it was Abramoff then who shepherded him around the island, made sure he would see what he wanted him to see. And DeLay took his family along. It was New Year’s Eve. Temperatures were very nice, much nicer than back in the States. And that’s what Abramoff was able to achieve. DeLay then became active in blocking legislation that would have cracked down on some of those terrible labor practices in Saipan.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to the issue of forced abortion, which is astounding given Tom DeLay’s stand on abortion. Can you talk about that?
BRIAN ROSS: Well, it’s completely counter to anything that DeLay or most Republicans seem to espouse, that was, on that island there were forced abortions. And the workers there who are all young women, who often had to pay to get these jobs, knew the rules. And they were barred from having boyfriends and certainly barred from having children if they became pregnant. They knew where to go, and there were a few essential back-alley abortion mills on the island. And that’s where these young Chinese women went in order to keep their jobs. And that was the deal. That’s part of the situation that was essentially endorsed by DeLay when he fought the laws. The laws were established essentially exempting Saipan, although it is a U.S. territory, from U.S. labor laws.
AMY GOODMAN: So, of course, the clothing that is made there says “Made in the U.S.A.”
More:
AMY GOODMAN: You talk about how in a memo that ABC News got that Abramoff wrote to his law firm, Preston, Gates, Ellis (& Rouvelas, Meeds, at the time), that was paid $1.36 million by Saipan officials, said such congressional trips, talking about Tom DeLay, are one of the most effective ways to build permanent friends on the Hill.
BRIAN ROSS: Exactly what they did. And, of course, Abramoff has now admitted that he used these trips as ways essentially of providing favors to congressmen who in return would do favors for him on Capitol Hill. And it’s not just Saipan. Of course, other trips to Scotland, to Moscow, to Paris, all around the world. Abramoff was a very friendly travel agent for members of Congress who wanted to go somewhere.
AMY GOODMAN:
BRIAN ROSS: Essentially what he accomplished was to stop legislation, which is easier to do than to get it through. He was able to block legislation that would have changed the labor and immigration laws in Saipan and made it illegal to have these kinds of contracts. You couldn’t have a contract like that in Los Angeles or anyplace else of the United States where the flag flies. But you could in Saipan. That was the loophole they were trying to close under the Clinton administration.
And in fact, when people at the Department of Interior attempted to do that, DeLay actually tried to introduce a bill to cut off funding for that particular section of the Department of Interior, to stop them from essentially backing the workers’ claims. And it became an ugly situation on Capitol Hill. And DeLay and others, but DeLay in particular, were involved in blocking the legislation and making sure that that status quo continued on Saipan.
Exploit one group, why not all.
Thanks for the link to the DN! transcript. I’ve been wishing I knew more about the DeLay/Abramoff story wrt the Marianas. Brian Ross explains it very clearly – and it is even more appalling than I imagined . . .
Abramoff ….does anyone know if he has any relationship with Stephen Hatfill who also was in South Africa around this time and has been a suspect in the Anthrax investigation. I know a lot of people think Hatfill was falsely accused, but I don’t. There is a ton of circumstantial evidence on him.
Also Juan Coles best column ever is today’s on Abramoff. Abrhamoff funneled donated indian money which were supposed to go to charilty to buy arms for radical Israieli settlers who had settled illegally on Palestinian land.
What have we become?
World Fascists
Remember…we are only hearing what we are hearing. What is it that we don’t know about. Look how far we have come in such a short time….how far we have come that we know about. How far have we come that we don’t know about.
Somebody has to find a way to get rid of Bush
I have been wondering about the South Africa connection myself but for another reason. As you may know, there were considerable connections between the white minority regime and Israel. A lot of joint development of conventional and non-conventional weapons were carried out. South Africa both built arms to Israeli designs and purchased equipment from them. It is widely believed that the Israelis tested an atomic bomb off the coast of South Africa, a highly suspicious flash was picked up on US satellites.
Now to get to your more specific point, biological warfare was one of the things that the South Africans were involved with. One project was an attempt to identify a germ agent that would selectively sterilise Palestinians so the demographic time bomb of higher birth rates could be defused. Hatfill could certainly have established links with the more fervent Zionists given these connections.
Now there may be a link here with Ariel Sharon in that he was both a senior Israeli officer and Defence minister and highly involved in the settlement movement. Despite his recent actions in Gaza, Sharon has been an enthusiast for them in the past and has purchased property in East Jerusalem. One of the corruption allegations against him involve a South African businessman.
As far as I know, there is no evidence that directly links the three or that they have ever met. Abramoff and Sharon have shared an interest in the illegal settlers and have connections with South Africa. Hatfill worked in South Africa apparently on projects that might have involved contact with Israel and is suspected of being involved in anthrax attacks which could be thought to have helped Abramoff.
As you may know, there are South African connections between a planned coup in an oil-rich country in Africa and a contractor providing “security” services for the US in Iraq. Many of the “specialists” in the old SA army sought to use their skill in a private capaity after majority rule. My diary of a month ago lists it. Now linking that in as well might be a push and you start to be in danger of seeing “worldwide Jewish conspiracies” but there do seem to be at least trading links between the extreme right in the US, the less savory elements of Apartheid SA, the fairly rich for who SA still remains a place for them to act as feudal lords and the more extreme elements in Israel.
and during Bush.
All of today’s attacks on free speech and political opposition were made during the Cold War half a century ago. The right has always made these arguments, and the masses of the people have always accepted them. There’s never been a serious objection to “government” power during my lifetime–only to liberal government power.
The reason that morons can triumph is that our system is structurally behind their goals and values, and against ours. Since corporations were ruled persons it’s been easily overpowered by business. If we hadn’t had the Depression at the same time a competing economic theory and world empire powers threatened, corporatocracy might have ended democracy here a lifetime ago.
The rise of the world of information–largely outside the reach and almost totally outside the conception of the Constitution–gives the powers of fascism vast spaces to operate that neither democracy nor civilization have ever discovered.
Historically, Reagan liberating the top end of the population and economy, and he & Clinton liberating the media, were the death knell for government of the people. In this information environment it probably doesn’t matter what form of government would be run here.
All Bush is doing is acting on the reality we on the left are between one-half and one full century out of date understanding.
I still say if we’re to take ‘back’ governance to any serious degree, we should study 3rd world minority democracy movements rather than the historic Democratic Party because of the position we’re in.
But ENOUGH “shock”.
This is nothing new.
It was this way during the Nixon years and the Reagan years. It was ALWAYS this way whenever J. Edgar Hoover had his hand in things.
It was this way when the best and brightest hopes we had were being murdered in broad daylight and patsies set up to take the blame.
It was this way when Joe McCarthy was demonizing people who gave a damn.
It was this way when Grandpa Bush was Hitler’s banker.
When the racist Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh were rich and powerful.
When the first real wealth in this country was made on the opium and slave trades.
It was this way when America was fucking FOUNDED on slavery. Our original sin…not yet really even admitted, let alone expiated.
When the entire nation was genocided our of the hands of its first residents.
And here we are once again wringing our hands and weeping while we sit at out $2000 computers in our $500,000 houses with $35,000 worth of gas guzzler(s) parked in the heated garage.
Give me a BREAK!!!
There is only one thing that will stop this situation in its tracks.
No…I take that back.
TWO things.
Either we make Washington DC look like this
and demand our country back SOON, or somewhere down the road all of America is going to look like this.
BET on it.
Our choice, now.
Business as usual…fall guys go down while bosses keep on with their hustle.
Or Nuremberg v. 2.
A mass catharsis of all of our sins.
We shall see.
Let us pray.
AG