What makes progressive values progressive? I think these core things:
For me, the key words that define progressive commitments are:
Progressives, unlike liberals or blanket Democrats, are ALWAYS willing to see how micro, or “personal” inputs affect the larger picture. Vegetarianism, local cooperatives, defining home work as work, holistic health care, small scale loans are all micro issues with a macro impact. Whether we buy into any of these ideas or not…we progressives seek to explore how they connect to macro issues like energy policy, militarism, and Big Box stores selling cheap goods from China.
We can trace the roots of our movement deep into the past, whether it is the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the writings of the founding fathers and mothers of our nation, or the utopian idealists and socialists of the 19th Century. We are, fundamentally, humanists who see interconnectedness and human equality as THE core values from which all else flows.
One of the most popular essays I’ve written was titled “link it.” That, at its core, is what progressives do, it is how we see the world. We link things.
It is precisely the long haul battle of moving from the micro to the macro and linking the two that is the essence of the progressive political movement at the start of the 21st Century.
None of us can be sure, ultimately, of the success or failure of the progressive project. We seek not so much perfection as amelioration: we seek no less than the sustainability of the human community on this planet. We are long term thinkers with muddy hands and boots from working in the real world; we work both sides of the equation, the long and the short term, electoral politics and idealistic projects which we will never see realized.
No one who is truly convinced of the value of progressive ideals doubts, ultimately, that those ideals represent our best and most pragmatic hope for justice and peace. Our aspirations are rooted in that conviction, that progressive politics are both idealistic and pragmatic. We progressives are called starry-eyed idealists…when, of course, it is often our opponents who are living an illusion: polluting the earth in the name of development, making war in the name of peace, torturing in the name of the rule of law.
The progressive task is to build a city we may never see or live in. We know this city will be far from perfect but we hope that it will be a city more joyful and more sustainable and secure for every human person both because of the ideals we aspire to and the hard won pragmatic lessons we’ve learned about how to live as humans on this earth.
We draw our strength and hope from the human dignity to be found in simple things. We are inspired by those who’ve gone before us, and those who share our work in so many ways. Though none of us may ever see it, we’ve tasted in our daily lives what a city built on justice, equality and dignity might be like; we know its building blocks because we’ve helped shape them with our hands.
At the end of the day, the progressive movement is based on an authentic hope forged where ideals meet praxis, a hope without illusions, a hope rooted in fundamental humanist values.
On our darkest days, like so many who’ve come before us, that hope is enough to move us forward.
{Speaking of “hope without illusions”…judybrowni’s diary Make yourself heard on Alito is worth a visit and a click or two for the cause}
As a way of making my blog sustainable…which it currently isn’t (returning readership is way down)…I’m doing a subscription drive.
I think there should be room for strong and sustained solo blogs like my own in the blogosphere and one way to help do this is RSS subscription. Subscription lets blogs that don’t have a post…or a “news item of the day” story…every day reach readers who, nevertheless, are interested our content and writing projects.
This is my feed:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/k/o
There’s more information about RSS in the “subscription drive” link above.
Truth is, any link or visit you can make to k/o is totally appreciated. I know and appreciate that you read out of your own free choice, and am grateful whenever you choose to check in.
thanks,
kid o.
Hey KO, just wanted to let you know that I have you on my blogroll and am extremely glad you have an RSS now as it’s tough sometimes to keep up with all the quality blogs out there and still have a life… 😉
But I do manage to check my RSS at least once per day.
Keep up the excellent work and thanks for continuing to post on BooTrib.
RSS is not perfect, but it is probably the best hope for blogs with a slightly slower pace to build readership…
ie. I could post three times a week and still know that folks who wanted to read the pieces would get a chance to see them.
Ultimately I continue to be politically and personally committed to posting on large community blogs. However, there are things that are possible in a solo or small group environment that I’m interested in exploring as well.
It’s a catch-22, of course, I could simply cross-post my pieces on booman and dkos every time. People would read them.
But, and this is political too, I think there’s a reason to have sustainable solo blogs and small group blogs, and I hope to find ways to make that work even as the process is awkward and…uh…lonely at times.
But, and this is political too, I think there’s a reason to have sustainable solo blogs and small group blogs, and I hope to find ways to make that work even as the process is awkward and…uh…lonely at times.
Just as there seems to be more of a tolerance for “Outside the Democratic party” views at sites like BooTrib, or MLW, than at sites like dKos, or MyDD, a solo blog OR smaller group blogs ensure even more freedom of speech and help to keep more diverse opinions out there.
Just as there are some views that I know won’t fly at dKos at all, but will generate discussion here, I can post stuff at my own blog that might even seem controversial here.
The key to solo blogs is that it makes for major alternatives to the big blogs that are easily accessible, a diversity that is always neccessary in developing outside the box ideas.
I don’t want what happened to the MSM to happen to blogs (The corporate sellouts in the SCLM!) And I am not even inferring that this has happened at all in blogs, just that I don’t want it to happen in the future.
Solo blogs can help keep the big blogs honest in a little way, IMHO. Unless you consider the conglomorate of right-wing-talking-point blogs re-enforcing their “circle of lies”… But that is a different topic. LMAO
.
education ● education ● education!
Struggle against poverty and equality starts at not going to school with hunger, here at home and across the globe. The fight is still at level of illiteracy.
EducationNews.org
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
education!
.
One secundary link you may have missed —
Research: Nutrition and health, Health foods
“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
Speaking of “hope without illusions”…judybrowni’s diary Make yourself heard on Alito is worth a visit and a click or two for the cause…
just sayin.
What you have written is nowhere.
Progressives, unlike liberals or blanket Democrats, are ALWAYS willing to see how micro, or “personal” inputs affect the larger picture.
I’ve wondered about this for years now so please bear with me.
Ever since ‘centrist’ Democrats decided to redefine and demonize liberalism, promote ‘progressivism’ (to the point of calling their policy wing The Progressive Policy Institute) the dialogue between and shared values of actual (and evolving in response to changing times) liberals and the Blue Dogs has been manipulative and confused and wider swathes of the former Democratic base voters have been effectively disinfranchised.
I’ve always been uncomfortable with the lable ‘progressive’ just as I’m uncomfortable with a ‘big tent’ which includes men like Zell Miller and Joseph Lieberman (and anyone who mocks ‘purity’ in discussions about public policy strategies which are so justly unpopular amoungst wide portions of the former Democratic party base, the operative justification ends with the phrase ‘Who else do they have to vote for’, a question which consistently over the past 25 years has been answered by increasing numbers of people with “nobody”, thus reducing those actively represented by the Democratic party to the white and middle class.
I’ve combed the Progressive Policy Institute’s database and have been unable to find much dot connecting or even much awareness that everyone in the country isn’t white and upper middle class so I guess I disagree with your characterization. As far as I can tell, Progressives read The New Republic and vote for Mary Landreiux and Joseph Biden. As far as I can tell elected progressives on a state and local level were in charge when Katrina hit New Orleans and when Grey Davis lost to Ahnuld. And on and on.
the US domestic political condition I have seen in a while, if ever.
A close runner-up would be that wonderful exchange between Mary Landrieux and Anderson Cooper in the early days of Operation Crescent Cleansing, her graciousness in thanking her fellow politicians, including Bush, as Anderson kept going on about people dying and bodies floating in the streets…
Thank you. Coming from you in particular that means a great deal. Besides, when trying to discuss what I see when I look at the state of ‘progressive’ politics I’m usually dismissed or treated with scorn and derision.
A close runner-up would be that wonderful exchange between Mary Landrieux and Anderson Cooper in the early days of Operation Crescent Cleansing, her graciousness in thanking her fellow politicians, including Bush, as Anderson kept going on about people dying and bodies floating in the streets…
A most telling moment in what is, I believe, the single most disgusting and terrifying domestic event since SCOTUS ruled in Bush v. Gore. So much for the ‘pro-life’ conservatives in both parties. Somehow, I’m deeply reluctant to reward the citizens of Gretna with billions of federal aid.
If you want to write a diary about the Progressive Policy Insititute and the DLC…be my guest.
Their use of progressive, which you endorse, has absolutlely nothing to do with this diary.
No, you’re not reading carefully. I was addressing your mischaracterization of ‘liberal’. My point was that while I often find self described ‘progressives’ who are either unable or unwilling to connect the dots (or, as you put it, being “willing to see how micro, or “personal” inputs affect the larger picture”) I seldom find self described liberals who are unwilling to do so. Thus your statement was both inaccurate and needlessly divisive.
My point about the PPI was to point out to you that the ‘centrist’ dems made up the term some time ago while simultaneously earning a good living savaging liberal ideas and people who self describe as liberals. And that they’re still doing this despite the fact that PEW reports people who self identify as ‘liberal’ as the most rapidly growing ideological niche of any of their multiple classifications.
Their use of progressive, which you endorse, has absolutlely nothing to do with this diary.
They made it up and it provides cover for all sorts of people who may or may not theoretically share your values but consistently do not demonstrate any inclination to express these values in their lives, battles (or blogging personas, for that matter).