Captain Ian Fishback did the unthinkable. At least in the eyes of some of the military brass.
Fishback took his military oath seriously. He put fulfilling that oath above any personal benefit he might receive through cutting corners or hedging his commitment.
For 17 months, he tried for clarification about the treatment of prisoners via every avenue possible within the armed forces. All his attempts reached a dead end.
Finally, he reached out to a United State Senator
Here is a copy of the letter Captain Fishback sent on September 16, 2005, to Arizona Republican Senator John McCain:
Dear Senator McCain:
I am a graduate of West Point currently serving as a Captain in the U.S. Army Infantry. I have served two combat tours with the 82nd Airborne Division, one each in Afghanistan and Iraq. While I served in the Global War on Terror, the actions and statements of my leadership led me to believe that United States policy did not require application of the Geneva Conventions in Afghanistan or Iraq. On 7 May 2004, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s testimony that the United States followed the Geneva Conventions in Iraq and the “spirit” of the Geneva Conventions in Afghanistan prompted me to begin an approach for clarification. For 17 months, I tried to determine what specific standards governed the treatment of detainees by consulting my chain of command through battalion commander, multiple JAG lawyers, multiple Democrat and Republican Congressmen and their aides, the Ft. Bragg Inspector General’s office, multiple government reports, the Secretary of the Army and multiple general officers, a professional interrogator at Guantanamo Bay, the deputy head of the department at West Point responsible for teaching Just War Theory and Law of Land Warfare, and numerous peers who I regard as honorable and intelligent men.
Instead of resolving my concerns, the approach for clarification process leaves me deeply troubled. Despite my efforts, I have been unable to get clear, consistent answers from my leadership about what constitutes lawful and humane treatment of detainees. I am certain that this confusion contributed to a wide range of abuses including death threats, beatings, broken bones, murder, exposure to elements, extreme forced physical exertion, hostage-taking, stripping, sleep deprivation and degrading treatment. I and troops under my command witnessed some of these abuses in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
This is a tragedy. I can remember, as a cadet at West Point, resolving to ensure that my men would never commit a dishonorable act; that I would protect them from that type of burden. It absolutely breaks my heart that I have failed some of them in this regard.
That is in the past and there is nothing we can do about it now. But, we can learn from our mistakes and ensure that this does not happen again. Take a major step in that direction; eliminate the confusion. My approach for clarification provides clear evidence that confusion over standards was a major contributor to the prisoner abuse. We owe our soldiers better than this. Give them a clear standard that is in accordance with the bedrock principles of our nation.
Some do not see the need for this work. Some argue that since our actions are not as horrifying as Al Qaeda’s, we should not be concerned. When did Al Qaeda become any type of standard by which we measure the morality of the United States? We are America, and our actions should be held to a higher standard, the ideals expressed in documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Others argue that clear standards will limit the President’s ability to wage the War on Terror. Since clear standards only limit interrogation techniques, it is reasonable for me to assume that supporters of this argument desire to use coercion to acquire information from detainees. This is morally inconsistent with the Constitution and justice in war. It is unacceptable.
Both of these arguments stem from the larger question, the most important question that this generation will answer. Do we sacrifice our ideals in order to preserve security? Terrorism inspires fear and suppresses ideals like freedom and individual rights. Overcoming the fear posed by terrorist threats is a tremendous test of our courage. Will we confront danger and adversity in order to preserve our ideals, or will our courage and commitment to individual rights wither at the prospect of sacrifice? My response is simple. If we abandon our ideals in the face of adversity and aggression, then those ideals were never really in our possession. I would rather die fighting than give up even the smallest part of the idea that is “America.”
Once again, I strongly urge you to do justice to your men and women in uniform. Give them clear standards of conduct that reflect the ideals they risk their lives for.
With the Utmost Respect,
— Capt. Ian Fishback
1st Battalion,
504th Parachute Infantry Regiment,
82nd Airborne Division,
Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Of course, the members of the so-called respected clergy who the mainstream media turn to when a morality quote is needed have been silent about all this. Any adherence to Christian theology by these opportunists would be deadly to their White House access. Breaking the omerta would be their ultimate sin.
The leaders within the VFW have also been conspicuous by their see-no-evil, hear-no-evil and certainly speak-no-evil behavior. Of course, if they want the President or Secretary of Defense to address the next convention, well, silence is golden. The choice between supporting the troops or the top of the power hierarchy is simple for these sell-outs.
Here are the closing paragraphs from an article in the December 15, 2005 issue of Rolling Stone:on what took place since Fishback contacted McCain:
“…The decorated officer tried to work within the chain of command, demanding that the military come clean. But after seventeen months of stonewalling, Fishback finally decided to break ranks. “It is infuriating to me that officers are not lined up to accept responsibility for what happened,” he told Human Rights Watch. “That’s basic officership, that’s what you learn at West Point. It blows my mind.”
Based on Fishback’s account — as well as testimony from two unnamed sergeants he recruited to speak out — the human-rights watchdog issued a horrifying report on the routine abuse of Iraqi detainees. Most alarming is the practice known as “Fucking a PUC” — a “person under control” — in which Army cooks wielding Louisville Sluggers were encouraged to let off steam by savagely beating detainees.
Fishback could have chosen to remain anonymous — “Officer C,” as he was named in the report. Instead, he crafted an open letter to Sen. John McCain, himself a former prisoner of war, accusing the top brass of contributing to murder by refusing to set clear guidelines. “If we abandon our ideals in the face of adversity and aggression,” he concluded, “then those ideals were never really in our possession.”
Fishback’s letter sped the passage of McCain’s recent amendment banning torture and forced the Pentagon to launch an investigation into the abuses. “I deeply admire his courage in speaking out about the treatment of enemy detainees,” McCain tells Rolling Stone. “I have met few people more honorable than this young man.”
Infuriated, Rumsfeld reportedly ordered subordinates to go after the lowly captain. “Either break him or destroy him,” Rumsfeld was quoted as saying. “And do it quickly.” For now, however, Fishback is training to become a member of the elite Special Forces. The challenges of speaking out, he believes, will only make him a better soldier…”
Who does our self-pronounced Christian President side with? Yes, the most powerful person in our country, the one who shamefully claims Christ as his favorite philosopher, well, he prizes loyalty to himself over that of his so-called saviour.
Go ahead George. It’s understood why you could care less about what happens to Ian Fishback. But allowing his crucifixion is no different than imitating Pontius Pilate. So go ahead George, pound yet another nail into the body of Christ.
* For those of you wishing to support Ian Fishback, email Supportfishback@aol.com
