Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly.
He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
MOSCOW/ST. PETERSBURG, January 25 (RIA Novosti) – Iran’s top negotiator at nuclear talks gave a cautious welcome to Russia’s proposal to establish a joint venture to enrich uranium for Iranian nuclear power plants on Russian territory and said Tehran wanted to continue talks with European Union representatives.
Ali Larijani, who is also the Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary, was in Moscow for talks prior to the arrival of a larger delegation, which is due to arrive in the Russian capital on February 13.
Would have loved to be there, seeing the increasing list of folks that confirm. But, alas…
Putting my faith in boran2 for another meet-up in the north-east, there seemed to be quite a bit of interest.
Were you suggesting cannibalism 😉
I would firmly like to state that we (on the left) do not eat our own. No, wait…
Anyway, it’s past 7. No more cubicle, heading home.
The Administration’s new FISA defense is factually false
In June, 2002, Republican Sen. Michael DeWine of Ohio introduced legislation (S. 2659) which would have eliminated the exact barrier to FISA which Gen. Hayden yesterday said is what necessitated the Administration bypassing FISA. Specifically, DeWine’s legislation proposed:
to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to modify the standard of proof for issuance of orders regarding non-United States persons from probable cause to reasonable suspicion. . . .
In other words, DeWine’s bill, had it become law, would have eliminated the “probable cause” barrier (at least for non-U.S. persons) which the Administration is now pointing to as the reason why it had to circumvent FISA.
[T]he Administration . . . submitted a Statement from James A. Baker, the Justice Department lawyer who oversees that DoJ’s Office of Intelligence Policy and Review . . . (snip)
Baker . . . in his Statement . . . began by effusively praising the Patriot Act on the ground that the 72-hour window provided by the Patriot Act had given the Administration the speed and flexibility it needed in order to engage in eavesdropping . . . (snip)
And then, regarding DeWine’s specific proposal to lower the evidentiary standard required for a FISA warrant, Baker said that:
The Department of Justice has been studying Sen. DeWine’s proposed legislation. Because the proposed change raises both significant legal and practical issues, the Administration at this time is not prepared to support it.
[T]he Administration identified two independent reasons for opposing this amendment. One reason was that the Justice Department was not aware of any problems which the Administration was having in getting the warrants it needed under FISA:
The practical concern involves an assessment of whether the current “probable cause” standard has hamstrung our ability to use FISA surveillance to protect our nation. We have been aggressive in seeking FISA warrants and, thanks to Congress’s passage of the USA PATRIOT Act, we have been able to use our expanded FISA tools more effectively to combat terrorist activities. It may not be the case that the probable cause standard has caused any difficulties in our ability to seek the FISA warrants we require, and we will need to engage in a significant review to determine the effect a change in the standard would have on our ongoing operations. If the current standard has not posed an obstacle, then there may be little to gain from the lower standard and, as I previously stated, perhaps much to lose. (snip)
The second concern the Administration expressed with DeWine’s amendment was that it was quite possibly unconstitutional:
The Department’s Office of Legal Counsel is analyzing relevant Supreme Court precedent to determine whether a “reasonable suspicion” standard for electronic surveillance and physical searches would, in the FISA context, pass constitutional muster. The issue is not clear cut, and the review process must be thorough because of what is at stake, namely, our ability to conduct investigations that are vital to protecting national security. If we err in our analysis and courts were ultimately to find a “reasonable suspicion” standard unconstitutional, we could potentially put at risk ongoing investigations and prosecutions.
By that time, the Administration had already been engaging in eavesdropping outside of the parameters of FISA, and yet the DoJ itself was expressing serious doubts about the constitutionality of that eavesdropping and even warned that engaging in it might harm national security because it would jeopardize prosecutions against terrorists. Put another way, the DoJ was concerned that it might be unconstitutional to eavesdrop with a lower standard than probable cause even as the Administration was doing exactly that.
The more things change the more they stay the same:
Copyright 1975 The New York Times Company: Abstracts
Information Bank Abstracts
NEW YORK TIMES
January 8, 1975, Wednesday
SECTION: Page 25, Column 5
LENGTH: 162 words
BYLINE: BY JOHN HERBERS
JOURNAL-CODE: NYT
ABSTRACT:
J Herbers analysis of Pres Ford’s comm to investigate allegations of domestic CIA spying holds Ford’s action in selecting his Vice Pres and men from outside Adm who have never been known for skpeticism about US intelligence operation is departure from past practices under Pres Johnson and Nixon, who made sure comms were balanced to represent opposing viewpoints on issues. Notes State Sec H A Kissinger, Philip W Buchen, Donald Rumsfeld and John O Marsh Jr aided Ford in selections. Says their decision was to find members who held wide public respect but would not compromise CIA. Says Adm officials privately say Pres’s selections were designed to avoid common occurrence of recent yrs: the runaway comm that issues findings or recommendations the Pres cannot accept. Notes no Cong member was apptd to panel. Says White House is encouraging Cong to appt special HR-Sen joint com to make inquiry. Notes other differences between this comm and past comms (M).
Despite advice to the contrary, former President Gerald Ford has given an obituary interview to The New York Times.
An account in this week’s Newsweek magazine said Donald Rumsfeld, Ford’s former chief of staff, considered the idea morbid and managed to stall The Times for more than a year. But Ford enthusiastically ordered approval of the interview, the contents of which the magazine said will remain secret until Ford’s death.
That ground rule, Newsweek said, enabled Ford to be more candid about such subjects as Watergate and the Nixon pardon that he would have been otherwise.
Wonder what Newsweek will have for us when Ford passes on?
Copyright 1977 The Washington Post
The Washington Post
January 14, 1977, Friday, Final Edition
SECTION: First Section; A15
LENGTH: 89 words
HEADLINE: Production of Warhead Ordered by Rumsfeld
BODY:
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld ordered the Air Force yesterday to start production of a new warhead about twice as powerful as present nuclear weapons on Minuteman III intercontinental missiles.
The brief announcement said Rumsfield acted after an assessment that the Mark 12A warhead “can achieve acceptable military characteristics.”
The Mark 12A warhead is designed for a nuclear explosion equivalent to 400,000 tons of TNT. A Minuteman III would carry three of them at a time, aimed separately at different targets.
Concerning the Matthews’ affair: I can’t help but think this is a bad idea.
We used to label certain blogs part of “the reality community” or some such thing. But I feel like some of the “reality” part is slipping away.
Matthews is not worth it — he is a slime ball of the worst sort. Even when he is attacking Republicans, which seems like never now-a-days, he is still a slime ball. His manners are the worst and he is so stuck on himself it is sickening to even see him on television.
But a boycott? I vote for turning off the TV altogether and putting on some music… or at least popping in a new DVD (I have the newest, and sadly, the last Bergman film here, hardly an action packed affair — but the man is a bloody genius in my book).
I think this boycott may have some legs. Tweety is already starting to back off a bit. And yes, he’s a slimeball, but he’s a slimeball that people take seriously as a journalist. We need to prove to his advertisers that he is alienating a large portion of potential buyers/users of their products.
And, here is my news re: what is going on in my life (other than digging into Medicare D and single payer info):
My car was making a really strange noise…had a repair done on it last year when it was doing something similar. So I took it back to the place where I had it fixed and here’s the good news. The noise that it is making is nothing to worry about per a reputable mechanic.
Mechanic’s suggestion re: car–drive it into the ground!!! Did that about 10 years ago: had a Fiero that had a blown head gasket–kept checking the fluids and got 100,000 miles on the damn thing–I swear to God!!! (Damn O2 sensors kept going out–learned how to change those myself!!!)
And, here’s an example of more of the bs that women have to put up w/when a car dies: Used to have an older, beat-up pick-up (got it for a couple hundred)a few years ago. Anyway, the starter died on that right near a questionable mechanic’s. I was told $300.00 for a new starter–said the hell with that–that price was more than what I paid for the damn pick-up. So I went into the shop, grabbed a hammer, beat the hell out of the starter, turned the key and drove away. Left my jacket in the shop–hell, they can have it! (I ended up buying a starter and a buddy changed it–less than $100!)
Wooohoo!! Congrats on the car. I hate bringing the car into the shop. As a woman, I feel like places try to take advantage of my lack of car knowledge and I get defensive. I’d love to take a basic car care class just to at least be knowledgeable.
Had that same problem myself in the past. But, after driving all of the junks that I have had (can’t afford anything 1/2way decent) learned one very important thing: If you find a reputable place, stick with them–go to independents, NOT dealerships. And, if it is something they don’t do, i.e., transmission work, ask them to refer you to someone. (They know who is good and who gives other mechanics a bad rep.)
Aquaintance of mine is the owner of a shop in town, and this guy is GOOD! (Treats people like he’d want to be treated, and, if a woman comes in stranded w/a car problem, he treats the woman how he’d want his wife to be treated if she were in that situation.) Told him about the starter incident and he wondered how places like that could stay in business. I recommend him all the time…and so do other people. Remember one time I was talking to one of my neighbors re: different a car problem and three guesses who I was referred to?
Copyright 1977 The Washington Post
The Washington Post
January 20, 1977, Thursday, Final Edition
SECTION: Style; Personalities; D4
LENGTH: 380 words
BYLINE: Karen De Witt and Nina S. Hyde
BODY:
It was “hello” and “goodbye” for Elizabeth taylor and husband, former Navy Secretary John Warner. Not to one another, but to jobs. Warner and Taylor were fron-row gusts at the “swearing out” yesterday of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Afterward Warner led his wife down the hall, saying, “I’ve got just five minutes to show her my former office.” Taylor herself is starting a new career. As a teacher. She is conducting a seminar on theater and film for drama students at the University of Virginia and surrounding high students selected by their drama teachers. Taylor and Warner are living in Middleburg, Va.
Tonight is the conclusion of The War that Made America on PBS. Since last week’s first installment was pretty even handed, albeit told, as usual, from the British Colonial experience, I expect tonight’s will be too. It was the Indians and the Canadians/Mississippi Valley French who were the losers in this struggle. The “real” French went back to France leaving their colonists, many of whom had been here for more than 150 years, behind to fend for themselves. And the Indians of the Great Lakes never lost the war, the French made peace without them. Once the Americans started moving into their land — well you know the rest.
I assume this would be a good adjunct for the Boo Book Club choice — Lies my Teacher Told Me. ,
One of my best friends is a member of one of the tribes around Buffalo NY that was part ofthe Iriquois Nation, and the oral history he received growing up was filled with quite a lot about this period of the French/Indian wars.
the native Americans were of course beytrayed by everyone, and in reality whether such betrayal was by white English or White French made no real difference to them in the long term. Empire is empire, and it always creates victims.
Yep. They were the losers. I guess you can argue that they were the losers the minute Europeans “discovered” America. But the loss of their land, etc. was not a done deal until the British defeated the French. Then the Indians could no longer play one side off against the other — that was a big defensive loss for them. And once the Americans were in control — well, to Americans, the only good Indian was a dead Indian. They waged a war to the death.
I tend to focus on the remaining French settlers also because I’m partly descended from French colonials and Indians. (And German settlers in Bucks county who were living during this time too.)
Tragically for the indigenous people, it wouldn’t have mattered in the end whether the English or the French prevailed. Their own plight would have been the same; disposession and annihilation.
I had Welsh and Austrian ancestors in Bucks County, (around New Hope), including one, (a Welsh Quaker doctor) who served with General “Mad Anthony” Wayne at Valley Forge and elswhere during the revolution against the British.
I have to admit, this song has been running through my head for much of the time since Katrina.
On the turning away
From the pale and downtrodden
And the words they say
Which we won’t understand
Don’t accept that what’s happening
Is just a case of others’ suffering
Or you’ll find that you’re joining in
The turning away
It’s a sin that somehow
Light is changing to shadow
And casting it’s shroud
Over all we have known
Unaware how the ranks have grown
Driven on by a heart of stone
We could find that we’re all alone
In the dream of the proud
On the wings of the night
As the daytime is stirring
Where the speechless unite
In a silent accord
Using words you will find are strange
And mesmerized as they light the flame
Feel the new wind of change
On the wings of the night
No more turning away
From the weak and the weary
No more turning away
From the coldness inside
Just a world that we all must share
It’s not enough just to stand and stare
Is it only a dream that there’ll be
No more turning away?
You shouldn’t have to watch it alone… and now you won’t have to.
On January 31st, Democrats from across the country will gather together and watch the State of the Union. At one of those parties, hosted by a Democracy Bond holder, Governor Dean will watch with them.
You can start planning your Watch Party in a few simple steps by visiting:
As an event host, you will be in a position to provide critical information to fellow Democrats in your community before the speech. Immediately following the address, there will be a nationwide conference call with Governor Dean, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
If you have never hosted one of these events before, it’s simple. One thousand individuals hosted parties for the national organizing kick-off, and it went off without a hitch. The DNC’s online event tools takes care of a large portion of the planning and invitation process. As the big day draws near, you will receive the latest information and research about the president’s speech so you and your guests are prepared to respond immediately.
In one year, the president is going to give another State of the Union Address — let’s make sure that when he looks out over both branches of the new Congress, he sees more Democrats than Republicans.
PS….I wish there was a firefox extension for booman like dkos
Reading about it here the next day is about all this guy’s stomach can handle at this point. I’ll watch a movie or Basketball game and try not to think about what is going on in D.C., at least for that night.
In my own little way, I’m trying to be supportive of the only Party, somewhat standing, that has a chance at turning the country around. I think it has less to do with watching, than the actual getting together with people LIVE.
I know, soon as I sent my pathetic response last night, I regretted it. I should know better and support you and Mr. Dean. Sorry for a moment of depressed weakness. I meant no offense.
Yes. You can take the photos to a good photography shop to scan them in for you, or you can purchase a scanner for home use. I have this scanner and it has a tray for slides and a different tray for negatives.
If you aren’t technically savvy, I would recommend taking the photos somewhere professional and having someone burn CDs for you.
Thank you. I may do the photo shop thing for now, as there’s no room on my desk for another gadget. But that’s a nice scanner and definitely one to consider at the point I get one. The current printer is a Canon, too.
I thought I might make some notecards, Christmas cards from some of the pix.
Getting better about being tech-savvy, especially thanks to online help.
My BF and I are going through old family photos and slides and slowly scanning them in for posterity. Would be a shame to lose the photos to time or catastrophic loss. That’s why we bought the scanner – we can do it at home in our spare time. But I’m a technical person so it is easier for me to set up than maybe some other people.
Tucker Carlson just said (in a promo for tonight’s show): “Should rapists decide who the next President is? That is what some Democrats are saying. See my show at x”
In a letter to Speaker Hastert, Democratic Leader Pelosi, Democratic Whip Hoyer, and Ranking Member Waxman ask for a congressional investigation into the role played by the Alexander Strategy Group, a lobbying firm closely linked to Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff, in the passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug Act and the drafting of the budget reconciliation bill currently before the Congress. (snip)
We are writing to ask you to open an investigation into the role that the Alexander Strategy Group, a lobbying firm closely linked to Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff, played in crafting the Medicare Prescription Drug Act of 2003 and the budget reconciliation bill currently pending before Congress.
The Medicare Prescription Drug Act, which has caused so much confusion and havoc since January 1, was a product of a corrupt legislative process. When the bill passed, we knew that Democratic members had been denied opportunities to offer amendments and that the vote had been held open for hours in the dead of night to twist arms. Afterwards, we learned that crucial cost estimates were illegally withheld from Democratic members; that the key Administration official responsible for writing the bill was simultaneously negotiating a high-paying job representing drug and insurance companies; and that the Republican chairman responsible for steering the legislation through Congress subsequently accepted a lucrative job in the pharmaceutical industry. We further learned about a Republican member who had alleged that a bribe had been offered him on the House floor.
Recently, with the indictments of Tom DeLay and Jack Abramoff, new questions have arisen about the role of the Alexander Strategy Group in this dishonest process. We know from lobby disclosure forms that the largest single client of the Alexander Strategy Group was the pharmaceutical industry, which paid the small firm over $2.5 million, including nearly $1 million in 2003 when the prescription drug law was being written. We also know from these records that the primary lobbyist for the drug industry at Alexander Strategy Group was Tony Rudy, who previously worked for both Mr. DeLay and Mr. Abramoff and who is identified as “Staffer A” in Mr. Abramoff’s indictment. And we know from multiple accounts in the news media that the Alexander Strategy Group has been deeply implicated in the scandals now sweeping through Washington. link
.
Washington has warned India a landmark deal giving it US nuclear technology may fall through if Delhi does not back a UN motion against Iran.
The deal could “die in Congress” if India does not vote against Iran at a meeting of the UN nuclear watchdog, US Ambassador David Mulford said.
The US is pursuing action against Iran over its apparent nuclear ambitions.
President George Bush will strong-arm
PM Singh over Iran vote.
India says it rejects any attempt to tie its stance on Iran to its deal with the US on acquiring nuclear know-how.
‘Test of credibility’
Washington agreed last year to share advanced civilian nuclear technology with Delhi, lifting sanctions triggered by India’s nuclear tests in 1998.
● UN Security Council Iraq vote bribe
● Pakistan backs $7bn Iran-India pipeline project
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
.
Favors Talks with EU
MOSCOW/ST. PETERSBURG, January 25 (RIA Novosti) – Iran’s top negotiator at nuclear talks gave a cautious welcome to Russia’s proposal to establish a joint venture to enrich uranium for Iranian nuclear power plants on Russian territory and said Tehran wanted to continue talks with European Union representatives.
Ali Larijani, who is also the Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary, was in Moscow for talks prior to the arrival of a larger delegation, which is due to arrive in the Russian capital on February 13.
[…]
≈ Cross-posted — earlier comment ≈
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
for the SoCal Meetup. (Not that earthshaking, but didn’t want Oui to feel lonely in here…)
Come one come all! We really want to see your face and give out lots of hugs!!
Would have loved to be there, seeing the increasing list of folks that confirm. But, alas…
Putting my faith in boran2 for another meet-up in the north-east, there seemed to be quite a bit of interest.
You will be missed and I sure hope you eaterners can get a meetup going too!
Spellcheck/preview is my friend. Of course you KNOW I meant Easterners right? LOL
Were you suggesting cannibalism 😉
I would firmly like to state that we (on the left) do not eat our own. No, wait…
Anyway, it’s past 7. No more cubicle, heading home.
Thanks. I will post another diary in a day or so. I’ve been researching accomodations.
from Glenn Greenwald:
Ummm, yea, they have nothing to hide here . . .
The more things change the more they stay the same:
Information Bank Abstracts
NEW YORK TIMES
January 8, 1975, Wednesday
SECTION: Page 25, Column 5
LENGTH: 162 words
BYLINE: BY JOHN HERBERS
JOURNAL-CODE: NYT
ABSTRACT:
J Herbers analysis of Pres Ford’s comm to investigate allegations of domestic CIA spying holds Ford’s action in selecting his Vice Pres and men from outside Adm who have never been known for skpeticism about US intelligence operation is departure from past practices under Pres Johnson and Nixon, who made sure comms were balanced to represent opposing viewpoints on issues. Notes State Sec H A Kissinger, Philip W Buchen, Donald Rumsfeld and John O Marsh Jr aided Ford in selections. Says their decision was to find members who held wide public respect but would not compromise CIA. Says Adm officials privately say Pres’s selections were designed to avoid common occurrence of recent yrs: the runaway comm that issues findings or recommendations the Pres cannot accept. Notes no Cong member was apptd to panel. Says White House is encouraging Cong to appt special HR-Sen joint com to make inquiry. Notes other differences between this comm and past comms (M).
From WP: 8/29/77
Wonder what Newsweek will have for us when Ford passes on?
I mean the NYT’s, not Newsweek.
Having fun with that?
A little birdie gave it to me.
Ya gotta see this – I don’t know how to reproduce the stuff she’s done, but this is destined to be a classic:
http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2006/1/25/171557/960
Samuel Alito: e unum, unum.
by susie dow
Wed Jan 25, 2006 at 05:15:57 PM EST
The preamble to the Constitution as seen thru the eyes of Samuel Alito.
Woo hoo!!!! Now I just have to drop the resignation bomb on my current employer. I can’t tell you how much I hate working for this organization.
Also, if you haven’t seen it yet, Open Letter to Chris Matthews is starting a targetted boycott of Chris’ advertisers. Feel free to pile on.
Congratulations!
Concerning the Matthews’ affair: I can’t help but think this is a bad idea.
We used to label certain blogs part of “the reality community” or some such thing. But I feel like some of the “reality” part is slipping away.
Matthews is not worth it — he is a slime ball of the worst sort. Even when he is attacking Republicans, which seems like never now-a-days, he is still a slime ball. His manners are the worst and he is so stuck on himself it is sickening to even see him on television.
But a boycott? I vote for turning off the TV altogether and putting on some music… or at least popping in a new DVD (I have the newest, and sadly, the last Bergman film here, hardly an action packed affair — but the man is a bloody genius in my book).
I think this boycott may have some legs. Tweety is already starting to back off a bit. And yes, he’s a slimeball, but he’s a slimeball that people take seriously as a journalist. We need to prove to his advertisers that he is alienating a large portion of potential buyers/users of their products.
And, here is my news re: what is going on in my life (other than digging into Medicare D and single payer info):
My car was making a really strange noise…had a repair done on it last year when it was doing something similar. So I took it back to the place where I had it fixed and here’s the good news. The noise that it is making is nothing to worry about per a reputable mechanic.
Mechanic’s suggestion re: car–drive it into the ground!!! Did that about 10 years ago: had a Fiero that had a blown head gasket–kept checking the fluids and got 100,000 miles on the damn thing–I swear to God!!! (Damn O2 sensors kept going out–learned how to change those myself!!!)
And, here’s an example of more of the bs that women have to put up w/when a car dies: Used to have an older, beat-up pick-up (got it for a couple hundred)a few years ago. Anyway, the starter died on that right near a questionable mechanic’s. I was told $300.00 for a new starter–said the hell with that–that price was more than what I paid for the damn pick-up. So I went into the shop, grabbed a hammer, beat the hell out of the starter, turned the key and drove away. Left my jacket in the shop–hell, they can have it! (I ended up buying a starter and a buddy changed it–less than $100!)
Woo-hoo!
Wooohoo!! Congrats on the car. I hate bringing the car into the shop. As a woman, I feel like places try to take advantage of my lack of car knowledge and I get defensive. I’d love to take a basic car care class just to at least be knowledgeable.
Had that same problem myself in the past. But, after driving all of the junks that I have had (can’t afford anything 1/2way decent) learned one very important thing: If you find a reputable place, stick with them–go to independents, NOT dealerships. And, if it is something they don’t do, i.e., transmission work, ask them to refer you to someone. (They know who is good and who gives other mechanics a bad rep.)
Aquaintance of mine is the owner of a shop in town, and this guy is GOOD! (Treats people like he’d want to be treated, and, if a woman comes in stranded w/a car problem, he treats the woman how he’d want his wife to be treated if she were in that situation.) Told him about the starter incident and he wondered how places like that could stay in business. I recommend him all the time…and so do other people. Remember one time I was talking to one of my neighbors re: different a car problem and three guesses who I was referred to?
the Casey ad will remain up here at BT? I’ll raise ya two peanut butter and sardine sandwiches.
Tonight is the conclusion of The War that Made America on PBS. Since last week’s first installment was pretty even handed, albeit told, as usual, from the British Colonial experience, I expect tonight’s will be too. It was the Indians and the Canadians/Mississippi Valley French who were the losers in this struggle. The “real” French went back to France leaving their colonists, many of whom had been here for more than 150 years, behind to fend for themselves. And the Indians of the Great Lakes never lost the war, the French made peace without them. Once the Americans started moving into their land — well you know the rest.
I assume this would be a good adjunct for the Boo Book Club choice — Lies my Teacher Told Me. ,
One of my best friends is a member of one of the tribes around Buffalo NY that was part ofthe Iriquois Nation, and the oral history he received growing up was filled with quite a lot about this period of the French/Indian wars.
the native Americans were of course beytrayed by everyone, and in reality whether such betrayal was by white English or White French made no real difference to them in the long term. Empire is empire, and it always creates victims.
Yep. They were the losers. I guess you can argue that they were the losers the minute Europeans “discovered” America. But the loss of their land, etc. was not a done deal until the British defeated the French. Then the Indians could no longer play one side off against the other — that was a big defensive loss for them. And once the Americans were in control — well, to Americans, the only good Indian was a dead Indian. They waged a war to the death.
I tend to focus on the remaining French settlers also because I’m partly descended from French colonials and Indians. (And German settlers in Bucks county who were living during this time too.)
Tragically for the indigenous people, it wouldn’t have mattered in the end whether the English or the French prevailed. Their own plight would have been the same; disposession and annihilation.
I had Welsh and Austrian ancestors in Bucks County, (around New Hope), including one, (a Welsh Quaker doctor) who served with General “Mad Anthony” Wayne at Valley Forge and elswhere during the revolution against the British.
I have to admit, this song has been running through my head for much of the time since Katrina.
Via Atrios, a very thoughtful analysis of media malfeasance and disservice by Peter Daou here.
Host a State of the Union Watch Party
You shouldn’t have to watch it alone… and now you won’t have to.
On January 31st, Democrats from across the country will gather together and watch the State of the Union. At one of those parties, hosted by a Democracy Bond holder, Governor Dean will watch with them.
You can start planning your Watch Party in a few simple steps by visiting:
http://www.democrats.org/events/create
As an event host, you will be in a position to provide critical information to fellow Democrats in your community before the speech. Immediately following the address, there will be a nationwide conference call with Governor Dean, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
If you have never hosted one of these events before, it’s simple. One thousand individuals hosted parties for the national organizing kick-off, and it went off without a hitch. The DNC’s online event tools takes care of a large portion of the planning and invitation process. As the big day draws near, you will receive the latest information and research about the president’s speech so you and your guests are prepared to respond immediately.
If you are interested in hosting Governor Dean in your home that evening, you must be a Democracy Bond holder you can sign up for that here https://www.democrats.org/page/contribute/DemBondBlog
In one year, the president is going to give another State of the Union Address — let’s make sure that when he looks out over both branches of the new Congress, he sees more Democrats than Republicans.
PS….I wish there was a firefox extension for booman like dkos
Reading about it here the next day is about all this guy’s stomach can handle at this point. I’ll watch a movie or Basketball game and try not to think about what is going on in D.C., at least for that night.
In my own little way, I’m trying to be supportive of the only Party, somewhat standing, that has a chance at turning the country around. I think it has less to do with watching, than the actual getting together with people LIVE.
I know, soon as I sent my pathetic response last night, I regretted it. I should know better and support you and Mr. Dean. Sorry for a moment of depressed weakness. I meant no offense.
From Robert Scheer’s excellent Truthdig, a terrific article by my favorite Gore, Gore Vidal., about the hapless Bush and the arc of history.
I’ve been cleaning out old pictures, lots of slides, and wonder if I can scan the keepers into the computer and then make CDs of them? Yes?
What additional gadgets would I need in that case? My hard drive will make CDs, although I’ve never used it for that.
Yes. You can take the photos to a good photography shop to scan them in for you, or you can purchase a scanner for home use. I have this scanner and it has a tray for slides and a different tray for negatives.
If you aren’t technically savvy, I would recommend taking the photos somewhere professional and having someone burn CDs for you.
Thank you. I may do the photo shop thing for now, as there’s no room on my desk for another gadget. But that’s a nice scanner and definitely one to consider at the point I get one. The current printer is a Canon, too.
I thought I might make some notecards, Christmas cards from some of the pix.
Getting better about being tech-savvy, especially thanks to online help.
My BF and I are going through old family photos and slides and slowly scanning them in for posterity. Would be a shame to lose the photos to time or catastrophic loss. That’s why we bought the scanner – we can do it at home in our spare time. But I’m a technical person so it is easier for me to set up than maybe some other people.
I have had a great deal of success just by taking a photo of the photo with my digital camera, and then just transferring the pix to my pc.
Good idea. I don’t have a digital camera, but it’s on my list of things to do/buy.
Tucker Carlson just said (in a promo for tonight’s show): “Should rapists decide who the next President is? That is what some Democrats are saying. See my show at x”
Bush did say “bring it on,” right?