Crusing the web, I came across this story (hat tip to No Capital) about how our Military is cutting off its nose to spite its face. Or more specifically, discharging medical specialists trained to care for our wounded in a time of war because they have that dreaded “Gay” lifestyle:
Military Discharged Hundreds Of Gay Health Professionals
by Lolita C. Baldor, Associated PressHundreds of officers and health care professionals have been discharged in the past 10 years under the Pentagon’s policy on gays, a loss that while relatively small in numbers involves troops who are expensive for the military to educate and train.
The 350 or so affected are a tiny fraction of the 1.4 million members of the uniformed services and about 3.5 percent of the more than 10,000 people discharged under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy since its inception in 1994.
But many were military school graduates or service members who went to medical school at the taxpayers’ expense -_ troops not as easily replaced by a nation at war that is struggling to fill its enlistment quotas.
Once upon a time, people used to be afraid that having transfusions of “colored blood” would be dangerous to them. In fact, it wasn’t that long ago that our own military subscribed to these absurd beliefs:
On the eve of the Second World War, the Red Cross stockpiled large amounts of blood because of techniques developed by the brilliant African American scientist Dr. Charles Drew. Drew himself became director of the Red Cross’s Blood Bank in 1941, but resigned his position after the War Department ordered that the blood of Black and white donors be segregated.
Drew called the order “a stupid blunder,” but the Red Cross complied and imposed Jim Crow in the blood supply. The Red Cross even initially refused to accept the donation of blood by African Americans at the beginning of the war effort–though it was willing to accept cash donations from them. Throughout the war, the NAACP investigated complaints by Black servicemen of racist treatment by Red Cross.
The Red Cross desegregated the blood supply after the Second World War nationally, but it allowed its Southern chapters to continue segregating blood through the 1960s.
And there were countries that specifically worked to eliminate a certain group of people from practicing medicine because the powers that be decided that they were unfit to care for “normal” people:
Germany moved to eliminate the ‘Jewish influence’ from medicine by limiting their access to patients and medical school. In order to bolster claims of Aryan supremacy, the study of blood became a focus for distinguishing Aryans from Jews. The combined effects of these initiatives dealt a self-inflicted wound on the Nazi war effort. The more than 8,000 Jewish doctors barred from practice were replaced by hastily trained and inexperienced paramedics.
I wonder how many of our wounded soldiers give a damn about who cares for them, just so long as they know what they’re doing and can help. But in America, it seems, some lessons take a long time to learn. The prejudices against Jewish doctors in Germany, and the bigotted belief that African American blood was somehow unfit for use by whites, even during a period of national emergency, are thankfully prejudices that most of us have long abandoned. Maybe someday, the US Military will wise up and abandon their jihad against gays and lesbians, a policy that is both detrimental to our wounded and morally repugnant.
I won’t be holding my breath however.
Powerfully emotional piece, Steven, and factually 100% accurate.
It’s just like when the military got rid of all those Arab linguists who were gay. Just stupid.
This has to come from Rummy. What an asshole he is.
to make cash donations to a fund for widows and orphans of the gunmen who die from lack of medical care.
I always have an extremely hard time posting on a diary like this because what exactly can I say about how this kind of fucked up neanderthal thinking is?
Going off on a rant won’t do any good except to make me feel better for maybe all of 2 seconds and accomplish nothing. But it really is just so gdamned stupid as to be offensive to anyone with even half a brain-you’d think anyway. Yet never underestimated the power of bigoted assholes who seem always to be awash in their own screwed up moral superiority that somehow makes them ‘better’ in their heterosexuality than someone who isn’t.
I’ve said it before that all gay people and anyone who believes all people should have equality should start a ‘Taxation Without Representation’ Movement. If gay people can’t get married, can’t adopt, can’t be in the service, etc etc than they shouldn’t have to pay full taxes because they are being denied normal everyday human rights that most take for granted and don’t even have to think about.
The shorter version of this would be to tell all these prickheads to shut the fuck up and quit worrying about what kind of sex other people may be having.
Some people spend an inordinate amount of time noticing what parts swing where and what , exactly, we’re allowed to do with them
Just let me ask you all, do you ask if someone is straight or gay when you go to the ER terribly sick or someone in your family needs help from a paramedic or somthing such as this in the civilian world? Hell no you dont so what is the difference if it is in the military or not. I do not think their argument will hold with me…however I am a straight woman, but that doesnt matter if one is straight or gay if we do our job as to be expected. What I DO AFTER HOURS IS NOT ONES BUSINESS IF I DO NOT DRAG YOU INTO IT….RIGHT??!!
every day:
“NURSE, QUICK! MY CHILD NEEDS SOME HETEROSEXUAL BLOOD IMMEDIATELY!”
I believe that there is some evidence that the dishonorable discharges etc are being delayed until after the serviceman/woman has served their tour in Iraq, even when the “offence” is known in advance.
In the UK, the different services do not discriminate and some branches have had recruitment floats or booths in Gay Pride events. Service personnel who enter into a “civil partnership” can apply to be housed with their partner in “married quarters”. Maybe its significant that it is expected an extra 3,500 British will be sent to Afghanistan later this year. That would equate to roughly the number of gays who would probably still be in the US forces if the policy had not been in force.