Here is an interesting perspective on the Iraq War, among other subjects, by a former high level Marine. Wouldn’t it be compelling if he, by some genie’s magic, became Secretary of Defense?
Now that would be ‘MUST SEE’ television in his appearances before Congress and such.
I do have a question though: why not give this guy an entire “Meet The Press” show or a full “60 Minutes” episode? This country would learn so much, especially those who could somehow pull themselves away from “Entertainment Tonight” and other such life-sapping dreck.
Ex-Marine leader poses hard questions about war
BY ADAM PARKER
The Charleston Post and Courier
12-11-2005
Within the first days of the invasion in 2003, the U.S. military dropped leaflets in Iraq: “Surrender and be part of the new Iraq.”
“It was a brilliant success,” said Nathaniel Fick, a former Marine commander who participated in that first campaign.
Then, as the operation began to heat up, the military dropped “humanitarian rations,” which did not include pork or chemical heater packs, which some in Afghanistan had ingested to their great peril. The rations came in bright yellow boxes so they could be seen easily.
This won the hearts of many, Fick said.
Then the military began dropping cluster bombs, some of which failed to explode upon impact. They came in bright yellow packages, too.
“Wires get crossed, with unintended consequences,” Fick said.
Those consequences – the erosion and eventual loss of trust in American forces and American policy – were the subject of a recent lecture Fick offered College of Charleston students and faculty when he stopped here as part of a book tour. He is the author of “One Bullet Away,” a memoir of his experience as a commander in the Marines’ elite 1st Reconnaissance Unit.
Fick was one of the first to respond to the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, as part of the invasion force into Afghanistan, and he helped lead the charge into Iraq about two years later. His book recounts his prewar training and experience in two conflicts as a captain of an infantry platoon.
His perspective is said to be unique because he was a Marine who straddled the historical line between pre-9/11 and post-9/11 America. His Dartmouth University education and degree in classics make his an especially articulate first-person account of battle.
But Fick is no yes-man.
He has harsh words for the Bush administration and its policies in the Mideast as well as for the yellow-ribbon crowd that refuses to question U.S. leadership.
“Occupation breeds resentment,” he said. “When you have a boot on someone’s neck, they don’t appreciate it.”
Fick bemoaned missed opportunities, such as the chance in December 2001 to go after Osama bin Laden in the mountains of Tora Bora after reliable intelligence showed the al-Qaida leader likely was holed up there. But senior brass called off the operation to seal the valleys – the only way out – instead leaving matters in the hands of the Afghan Northern Alliance.
Fick said he suspects some improvised negotiating resulted in bin Laden’s escape.
“Kick the anthill and everyone would scatter,” he said. “And they’ll never be in one place again.”
While Fick disparages some of the politics that determine the United States’ Iraq policy, he is quick to point out that the Marines fundamentally are apolitical. The military is merely a tool politicians use to get what they want. And in the case of Iraq, it can only set the stage for the Iraqis themselves to rebuild their nation.
“Marines set preconditions for political change,” Fick said. “The military, however, cannot affect that change.”
Just because the Armed Forces are apolitical – they follow the orders of the commander in chief regardless of his party affiliation – that doesn’t mean they have no politics, Fick said.
The military is made up of individuals who are overwhelmingly conservative and predominantly Republican, he notes. “And that’s a problem.”
When most people in an organization share the same view, the world is seen in terms that are too absolute, he said.
Fick, who worked with Canadian, British, Australian and German forces, said he had the sense that they were more diverse politically and economically than the U.S. military.
This diversity encourages a nuanced interpretation of world events, he said.
Read on here because Fick also has some interesting things to say about the American public:
http://www.charleston.net/stories/default_pf.aspx?newsID=58041
One brief tidbit to entice you to continue:
“…Blue-state people seem to be relieved that an ex-Marine, of all people, would speak out against current policy, while red-state folks seem to be less willing to think through the issues, he (Fick) said…”
Hmmmmm.
