by Geov Parrish
Geov Parrish is a weekly columnist for the Seattle Weekly and for the national site, WorkingForChange. He posts regularly at Eat the State! blog. Geov will post often here, and looks forward to your comments so he can respond to you. His full, fascinating bio is below.
________________________
I was laid up in the hospital all this last week, meaning I got to witness both the Alito debacle and the SOTU from the linoleum-caked institutional halls of the intensive care unit. Some pain-soaked immigrant whose liver was shot was screaming “Mama, MAAAMMAAAA, MAAAMAAA” all through Bush, which seemed oddly appropriate.
The local progressive blogosphere has been all a-twitter this week over Maria Cantwell’s “betrayal,” i.e., her vote to end the anti-Alito filibuster, and whether as a consequence progressives should still support her re-election bid this year. (Conclusion: Yes, because she’s a Democrat, and that’s what progressives do: we get screwed by Democrats, and then we vote for them anyway because being screwed by their opponents would be so much worse.) Excuse me?
Who did people think they were dealing with here? Cantwell (D-Wash.) is a centrist. Always has been, always will be. For three years, her position on Iraq has been indistinguishable from George Bush’s. She’s voted to confirm John Negroponte and a host of other Bush conservatives. ANWR was a shining moment. But on most issues, she is right there with Hillary Rodham Clinton, Joe Lieberman, and the other muddled moderates of the DLC. She. Is. Not. Liberal. She. Is. Not. Progressive. Cantwell’s votes on Alito taught us nothing about her that we didn’t know a month ago, or five years ago.
Readers know what I think of the Democrats’ utter failure to mount any serious challenge to the Alito nomination. They gave up at about the same instant he was nominated. But Democrats in general, and centrists like Cantwell in particular, were never given a political reason to betray their own instincts for accommodation and instead mount a real fight. Principle means nothing to these people. Even being a permanent minority party — a very real possible consequence of Alito’s confirmation — does not matter.
What matters is getting re-elected. And Cantwell never got the kind of constituent pressure on Alito that would make her sit up and take notice, let alone take action, let alone take courageous action. … continued below …
Dems like Cantwell DO NOT GIVE A (HOOT) about their political base, because they assume that base has nowhere else to go. Even when, as with Cantwell, they won their last election by only a thousand or so votes.
Cantwell, like every other Democratic senator, really only heard from anti-Alito constituents in great numbers for two or three days before the final vote. That level of frenzy should have started on Halloween, the (appropriate) day Alito was nominated, and never let up for an hour until Alito withdrew his nomination. Nothing of the kind happened, and that’s our failure. Not Cantwell’s. Ours. Now that, as with over a dozen other moderate Democratic senators, Cantwell has pissed on her base, again, the candidacies challenging her — Mark Wilson’s quixotic anti-war primary campaign, and Aaron Dixon’s rumored Green Party bid — are so hopelessly disadvantaged in organization, money, and support as to be politically meaningless.
Wilson and Dixon are great guys. Lifelong activists. Our guys. It’s our fault that nobody else has heard of, or will hear of, their candidacies. Not Cantwell’s fault. Ours. If Cantwell isn’t worried about taking on the money of Ted Stevens over ANWR, she’s sure not losing sleep over Wilson. (More’s the pity.)
Progressives like to piss and moan a lot about being unrepresented in the political process, and that’s true. It’s also true that the deck is stacked against our participation in many different ways. But difficult is not impossible. It’s up to us to build the coalitions, energize the constituents, and field the campaigns that will win us respect and influence when it comes to impacting public policy. That means more than laying out critiques and alternatives and mounting protests and position papers and expecting the world to salute. It means organizing, and it means listening to others and incorporating their concerns and ideas, and it means packaging our issues and candidates attractively and organizing more, and then organizing again, and again, until the world is forced not to salute but to get the hell out of the way of the fast-moving train.
That’s how the big boys and girls do it. If our issues and ideas and critiques and alternatives are so much better, and polls show widespread support (which they often do), we have advantages that can make up for having less money and experience. We can earn the experience. The days of any political hack with a (D) after her or his name automatically collecting our time, money, and votes because they haven’t (at least officially) jumped parties needs to be O-V-E-R. We can play this game, too.
It’s about time we started. Else the Maria Cantwells of the world will keep right on letting the Samuel Alitos of the world run our lives. She and her type will keep right on urinating on her base until she has a good reason not to, and he and his ilk will keep right on urinating on all of us until he is removed from power.
Find a campaign you like. Get experience. Get involved. Bring your friends. Recruit their friends. Stop complaining, and seize power.
Your move.
_________________________
Geov Parrish has been a local and national political activist and grass roots organizer since the mid-’70s, in Oregon, Houston, Washington D.C., and, since 1990, in Seattle. He is a former broadcaster, punk rock singer, convenience store clerk, strawberry picker, and successful small business owner whose first regular political writing (other than songs and poetry) came with co-editing the national pro-feminist Activist Men’s Journal (1991-96) and co-founding the Native American community newspaper On Indian Land in 1991. In 1996, he founded, and has since continued to co-edit, the community newspaper Eat the State!.
ETS! led to an unexpected career as a political commentator, beginning with offers to write regular weekly columns in The Stranger (1997-98) and both column and feature writing in Seattle Weekly (since 1998). Since 2001 he has written from two to five columns weekly for Working Assets’ national web site, Workingforchange.com. His work has also regularly appeared in AlterNet, ZNet, Common Dreams, In These Times, Mother Jones, and on web sites and in newspapers, magazines, and anthologies across the country. Since 1996 he has also appeared each Saturday morning on Seattle’s KEXP-90.3 public affairs program Mind Over Matters, and also records short political commentaries each week which air on KBCS-91.3 and on other community radio stations around the country. He contributes regularly to the Eat the State! blog.
A lengthy, terminal illness led to an experimental (and successful) double-organ transplant in 1994. Assorted serious health complications, including a stroke, have continued. Geov lives in Seattle with his long-time partner, Gavin Greene, and the dog Kit, who actually runs the house.
= = =
Welcome to the site, Geov!! And here’s wishing you good health.
Quislings, want to call themselves Democrats, and they don’t act like Democrats — well, then nobody but them should be surprised when progressives work to boot ’em out of office.
Maybe it will scare the rest of the lily-livered into doing their duty to both their constituents and the rest of the country, as well.
For security reasons, all new members with furry pets are required to post photos of them in the Froggy Bottom Lounge.
This is for your protection.
I like Eat the State. 🙂
Geov, just so you know, Ducky is a leftwing extremist. I’m not sure his politics have to do with why he wants to see a photo of the furry one.
I’d like to see Kit. Is he a cat or a dog. He should be a cat.
Jeeeeeeeeeez … am I tired or what? It says “dog Kit.”
I think it’s all that screaming at my teevee yesterday. I’m spent. I scared the shit out of my cats, I know that much.
(Where’s my silver cross? Dick Thornburgh is on my teevee … omg, Dr. Cyril Weight faces lots of criminal charges. I guess they won’t be interviewing him about Natalee Hollioway for a while.)
I am proud to be a moderate.
Hear! Hear!
Ductape, you ROCK! As always. I may not always agree with you, but I sure do like the way you make my head explode sometimes … and I mean that in a good way. Having my thinking challenged isn’t always pleasant, but the eventual outcome is always positive. And that’s a good thing!
You got me but good, Ducky!
(You know I was just joshin’ … and now I know why I was so addled last evening and couldn’t even read that Kit is a dog (duh!) … I have the full-blown flu and it hit me hard in the middle of the night, the story of which no one wants to hear.)
Back to bed momentarily … been there all day, and I’m sick of it.
I too most heartily welcome Geov to the site! I’ve been reading his commentary on Working For Change for several years, and really appreciate his perspective on any of the issues he takes on in his columns. I was really excited to see that he will be posting here regularly, and look forward to more of his insightful commentary. That doesn’t mean I won’t still haunt Working For Change, cuz I gotta have my weekly dose of Molly Ivins, but it’s great to see a committed ‘heavy hitter’ jump into the pond. Kudos.
And hoping Geov’s health will continue to improve. We need good men like him! (And more smart women too … don’t want that last comment misconstrued!)
Good call to action. Productive, optimistic, but grounded in real politick.
We, as the progressive left, need to get out of our echo chambers and start working on advancing our values and educating our friends and neighbours in each and every interaction we have.
Luckily we have some pretty damn active activists here in the Frog Pond… glad to have you with us holding our feet to the fire.
Geov-
From one newcomer to Booman to another, welcome into this community! I’m finding this to be a good pond to jump into and swim around in!
howieinseattle
Welcome to the pond Geov.
I’d like to learn more about Aaron Dixon and others like him, which explains why I love the color around here so much ;o)
I like your message. I’ve been so frustrated lately with the democrats that I resigned myself to looking for intelligent life by broadening my search here ;o)
Various comments:
Kit is a dog, except when she makes pig-like noises. “Tampopo” is one of my favorite all-time movies! (I lived in Japan, twice, and was married for 20 years to a Japanese woman. The film rings very, very true…)
Aaron Dixon has for nearly four decades been a prominent African-American civil rights leader in Seattle, dating back to his Black Panther days. At this point he is only considering a Green Party run against Cantwell. It’s a pity the GP doesn’t have nearly the resources or organization to do a legend like Aaron justice.
Similarly, I’m not writing off Mark Wilson. I do think it’s beyond unimaginable that he can beat Cantwell in a primary. But it’s not at all inconceivable that he could do well enough in a primary to give Cantwell a good, soul-searching scare.
Cantwell as centrist: sorry, but this ounntry is a lot more conservative than many progressives think. The Senate has 55 R’s and an independent (plus the undefinably wretched Joe Lieberman), all of whom sre more conservative than Cantwell. In the context of this country’s politics — todsy, not 25 yeats ago — she’s a centrist. By the world’s standards, of course, she’s a raving right-wing lunatic.
For what it’s worth, I’m not letting Cantwell and other Democratic senators off the hook for their wretched performance against Alito. (See, among others, “The Democrats Surrender” on http://www.workingforchange.com, on 1-18-06, two full weeks before the final vote.) That’s simply not what I was writing about or responding to here. I find it beyond appalling that Dems essentially turned over control of the third branch of gov’t with barely a whimper. It’s inexcusable. But I keep coming back to the fact that they don’t pay attention to what progressives think because they don’t have to. That’s not “blame the victim”; it’s power politics, Beltway style. And since we’ll never compete with money, we have to compete with bodies.
Thanks to everyone for the kind wordd of welcome. I hope I can deserve them.
I’m going to remain in my radical, leftwing, elitist, extremist position that the fundamental concept of a republic is that it is the job of the representative to be able to act intelligently.
Alito was not an “issue” of the sort that only portions of the electorate or political activists are likely to grasp. Quite the reverse. It takes someone in position to see and with the training and experience to discern a move that commits the entire nation to a radical restructuring of the nature of government itself for a generation or more to come.
The responsibility was the Senators’–heirs, and the framers’, and it doesn’t matter one cent to me which of them has made this system an overt threat to me for the rest of my life.
Welcome and wishing you good health.
Okay, let’s try some of that framing stuff I’ve been reading about (btw, total political novice here):
Cantwell is a right-wing Democrat.
Ah, that feels better.
Well, I’m one who is usually arguing that framing is about a lot more than which words are chosen, but damn! calling Cantwell and her ilk a “centrist”?
To most people “centrist” = “moderate.” The radical right is doing it’s damnedest to remodel voters’ frames to view DTF’s definition of moderate (hear! hear! DTF) as the looney, extremist left.
Call Cantwell what she is – NOT a centrist, in the average person’s understanding* of that word. Right-wing Democrat is a much more accurate description of her. So thanks, tampopo, for making that clear.
[*We wonkish types, of course, have discussed at length what we mean by “centrist” and we don’t mean it as a compliment. We see the radical right as having re-defined the political landscape so far to the extreme right that “centrist” is somewhere between Francisco Franco and common sense. That the radical right has done this, and how they have done this, is something I’ll be happy to explain – at some length – to any “average person” who will sit still long enough to hear my rant on the subject. However, since most of them get restless when I do, “right wing Democrat” will do in the meantime.]
And btw, Geov, other than the quibble about the description of Cantwell as a centrist . . . right on!
The way I figure, if she doesn’t care about her “base”, then she shouldn’t be too surprised if her “base” stops caring about her. Blaming the victims of her cowardice does not in any way, shape, or form exhonerate her for her lousy choices. That’s what all this “y’all should have started calling her office on Halloween” talk amounts to: blaming the victims. Fuck that!
If I were living in the Evergreen state, I’d be voting for her challenger in any primary, and if need be would be voting Green in a general election. A Democrat that votes barely differently from her Republican counterparts is for all practical purposes irrelevant. That’s the reality.
Geov (who is one of the last readable attributes of the Weekly) raises the very good point– which I dismissed earlier today, but which makes quite some sense now that he’s ‘splained it to me– that real hellfire should have been brought upon Cantwell many months ago, back around Halloween, or for that matter, from the moment she slithered out of her Redmond corporate campus and onto our local tv screens.
But, Geov, uh, then you make it sound like Wilson’s campaign is a lost cause at this point, because, erm, we’ve got only SEVEN months until Cantwell’s inevitably re-throning, so we might as well throw in the towels now? Only SEVEN months???
I, on the other hand, am seeing SEVEN months of Wilson-sponsoring, money-raising, door-to-door knocking, opportunity just sitting there like money on a table, if we don’t seize this opportunity.
Or seen him speak? What did you like about him?
Whoops, I forgot to make the point– in case it weren’t obvious– that Halloween was only 4 months ago, but the primaries are seven months hence. That’s seven months to mobilize. Okay, off my soapbox.
Now this is a breath of fresh air. After repeated posts about how we should forgive Cantwell (and her ilk), it is nice to see an opposing viewpoint. I do not like golden showers and I cannot support people who piss on me. If I had to hold my nose and make a choice, I probably will choose pee over shit. That is not to say that I will not attempt to replace the pee’er with someone who has ethics.
This point needs to be driven home…we do have a voice and we can be heard if we scream loud enough.
I was thinking today that I would love to see a BuyBlue type site that focused on our Dems and how they vote. A nice, simple chart showing each major vote and how our Dems stacked up, House and Senate. Then the liberal blogosphere would have an easy way to evaluate each Dem. Combined with a PAC, it could be a great way to bring all the Liberals and Progressives together to take over the Democratic Party, or at least get a more representational voice. I would also recommend a boycott of all the major Democratic groups that support unethical Dems, like Lieberman, Cantwell and Feinstein. Not one dollar more! By backing alternative candidates and using the blogosphere, we could potentially make a difference. Heck, I even think if such a thing got off the ground and was widely received, it would make a difference.
I can see how some politicians are already responding to Liberals and Progressives presence on the internet. I don’t think we would have gotten as far as we did with the Alito filibuster otherwise. It just wasn’t far enough. It’s time to turn up the volumn, if not for us, then for our children and grandchildren.
What do you like about him?
Have you worked with him?
Have you seen him speak lately? What did you like about his ideas? What did you like about the way he presented himself?
If you know him, why hasn’t he run for any lesser office, to see how being a part of government suits him?
that is, supporting the campaign of Ned Lamont, which I think actually could unseat Joe.
I think this would be a very effective warning shot across the bow for “moderate” Dems in DC. And I think it’s do-able.
At the least, I think people from all over the country should give a tiny bit of money to Ned Lamont’s campaign — that alone would send a very effective message to DINOs about the possibility that people CAN unite to defeat them.
http://nedlamont.com/
My $10 is nothing. 100 people with $10 is $1,000. Ned says he’s aiming for 100,000 donors from around the country. I’d love to see that happen.
What do you all think?
Well he did run for “lesser” office, the House of Representatives, in 2002, He ran that time as a Green again Congressman Jay Insleee. Then he ran against Sen. Patty Murray in 2004, as a Libertarian. But your point is well-taken, IMO.
Re: #25 from Howie in Seattle: My records don’t show what party Wilson ran with when he challenged Inslee in ’02, since he was a minor candidate outside Seattle; I assume it was Libertarian, since he was definitely Green Party when he ran against Murray in ’04.
I’ve known Mark Wilson for years through his association with Veterans for Peace in Kitsap County. He’s been a presence in and around anti-war efforts in Seattle for many years. I’ve never seen him speak on the campaign trail but judging from campaign literature he’s equally progressive on other issues. I’m a little suspicious that he keeps running for office when he’s done so poorly, but he (quite accurately) sees a dearth of progressives in these races.