by Larry C. Johnson (bio below)
The jury is still out on whether Porter Goss is cleaning up the CIA or politicizing it. US News offers an excellent article on some of the current problems (see Seeking Spies) at CIA. Despite the happy talk that the place is getting better, there is an exodus of mid-level personnel underway. Basically, folks join the CIA thinking they will become Jack Ryan or Mitch Rapp. Within a few short years they realize they are Dilbert.
I don’t know if the CIA can be fixed, but recent news suggests Goss is serious about clearing out risk averse bureaucrats who were acting more like sedate bankers than dashing case officers. I am referring to the removal announced this week of Robert Grenier as the Chief of the Counter Terrorism Center. Some outside the Agency see this as part of a political vendetta. Folks I’ve communicated with who are knowledgeable and have had dealt with him say this is good news.
Before becoming the Chief of CTC, Robert Grenier (aka Bob) had been the CIA Chief in Islamabad during and after 9-11 . When the CIA started fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan in October of 2001, Grenier was one of the foot draggers. I’m told he took the Pakistani position on everything and was at constant odds with the Chiefs of the Counter Terrorism Center (Cofer Black and Hank Crumpton) on key issues of the war. US military personnel who worked with Grenier during his time in Pakistan remarked that he was always a dapper dresser and worked banker’s hours. They joked that he was well rested during the war. His men, however, were in the office around the clock. Case officers I know and respect viewed him as personally ambitions and not a stand up guy. He would not take a spear in the chest for anyone. With the benefit of history we can now see that Coffer and Hank were vindicated when the Taliban collapsed.
Unfortunately, the Robert Grenier type of case officer is the kind of person who has prospered at CIA. … continued below …
These are the men and women in the Directorate of Operations who were hired to be spies but preferred to stay in the suburbs of Northern Virginia rather than go overseas. Once overseas they chose to hunker down and put their time in. They are adept at playing political games in the halls of the CIA Headquarters. And, until recently, they were the ones getting promoted. The former DDO, Jim Pavitt is another example of this type. Many friends tell me he was a nice guy but had no business leading the DO. Pavitt, I’m told by guys who know, failed to successfully complete his first tour overseas as a Chief of Station, but was eventually elevated to the job of Top Spy because of his political skills on Capitol Hill. Case officers who were true field operatives were horrified by Pavitt’s lack of leadership during his tenure.
So, is Porter Goss purging “stay at home hacks” or retiring the hard charging field operative we need? He has done some of both since taking over. During Porter’s first months on the job he brought with him some Hill staffers who had also been CIA officers. These folks, known derisively as “Gosslings”, set out on their own personal vendetta against EUR (Europe) case officers. Their first casualties were Stephen Kappes and Michael Sulick (Kappes and Sulick were DDO and ADDO respectively). My friends tell me that Kappes and Sulick were a breath of fresh air because they were true operators and preferred being in the field rather than hanging around the CIA cafeteria. Rather than intervene to keep these guys on board, Goss kept hands off and did nothing when they resigned. This initial hands off attitude left him with a reputation, perhaps undeserved, that he was playing politics with CIA personnel.
Does Grenier’s departure signal that Goss now is serious about trying to reform the CIA? Maybe. The CIA, unlike the U.S. military or the State Department Foreign Service, does not have an “up-or-out” career service. The U.S. Army, for example, would nornally only promote about 70% of Captains to the rank of Major. Those not promoted had to resign. (As noted in a previous blog, the Army is slipping on this quality control because they are desperate for bodies). The CIA, however, only required you to survive your first three year probation period. Once you passed that milestone you had a job for life (as long as you didn’t sell yourself to the Russians or the Chinese). Not surprisingly the upper ranks of CIA managers, particularly over the past decade, have tended to be filled with folks who were great at getting along with their bosses but were not necessarily good field operatives. Unlike the Army, where the weeding out process still leaves you with officers as diverse as Barry McCaffrey and Tommy Franks, the CIA upper ranks became more homogenous and rewarded those who were most like their superiors.
Two things are certain–we need good human intelligence and good field operators can not be trained over night. The current turmoil at CIA will put this nation at risk if we do not get serious about training, supporting, and retaining a new generation of case officers who are willing and comfortable in working overseas for extended periods. Solving this mess must be a priority for Goss. Grenier’s dismissal may be a sign that he is getting a hand on the massive task. Now, if George Bush and Dick Cheney would finally admit that outing CIA case officers like Valerie Plame is a bad thing, we would truly be on the road to a new and better CIA.
……………………………………………………..
Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm that helps corporations and governments manage threats posed by terrorism and money laundering. Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism (as a Deputy Director), is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management. Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC’s Nightline, NBC’s Today Show, the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world. Further bio details.
Personal Blog: No Quarter || Bio
Recommended Book List || More BoomanTribune Posts
Thanks so much for this, especially the background… I saw the reports yesterday on dumping Grenier but I wanted to know if it was true.
I also heard Grenier was on the Iraqi Survey Group, is this true do you know? Is this one of the guys who was willing to “fix” the intelligence to suit the administration?
Pax
Beware any and all BushCo appointees.
If as is evident from the results of the policies and actions of this administration over last six years…if it walks like a duck, etc… the true purpose of the BushCo regime is to either topple this country from its position of power in the world or (more likely) to try to maintain that position by turning the U.S. into a fascist system in the belief that the elite (the corporate elite, in this case…the “winners”) should rule the the people (the “losers”) by edict…
If either of these possibilities are true then any and all BushCo appointees (No matter how effective their short term actions may appear to be) are agents of a terrible change that is about to befall us here.
Short and sweet?
Resist them ALL.
On every level.
Winston Churchill: “…whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.”
There really is no other valid approach when one is resisting fascism, whether its forces use tanks or Diebold machines.
Goss is just another functionary in this system, and if in the course of conquering Europe Hitler’s troops might also have displaced or killed a few thieves or incompetent malingerers, that in NO WAY means that they should have been congratulated for their actions.
Remember this.
BushCo is the enemy of individual freedom.
This has been proven a thousand times, beyond any reasonable doubt whatsoever.
Are they sincere in their beliefs, in their approach, these people? Do they really believe that what they are doing is good for America and thus by extension good for the rest of the world?
I sincerely hope so, because any OTHER consideration of what they are about leads to real horror as far as I am concerned.
But…Hitler was sincere as well. (Unless you believe in the existence of pure evil. A VERY rare occurrence here on earth, in my view, and even MORE rare at high public levels of effectiveness. Or so I pray.)
He was simply wrong.
WAY wrong. As events proved.
Well…these people are wrong too, and will undoubtedly fail in their efforts no matter WHAT the philosophical roots of those efforts may be. But if and when they ARE to fail, better early than late, because the longer this kind of mistake continues, the more massively horrifying the results. And the only way to effectively combat this sort of movement is to fight its proponents indomitably, on every front.
Just as Mr. Churchill so eloquently suggested.
But…there ARE no “beaches” in this war. It is INFO war, being fought here in this brave new Information Age. And when we say…”Oh. Well, it looks like Goss may be cleaning up the CIA” or “Oh. Well, Alito isn’t THAT bad” or “Oh. Well, we DO have to stay in Iraq because we can’t afford to let it fall apart” we are essentially saying “Oh. Well, Czechoslovakia wasn’t really working that well anyway, and those Germans DO need their lebensraum.”
We are collaborating with the enemy.
We are Chamberlaining away a piece of our war; we are Vichying with these viciously wrong motherfuckers.
And it just does not work.
We are already at the point where they have taken over the Czechoslovakia and Poland of our freedom and culture, and the invasion of France is not that far in the future.
We must wake up and wake up NOW.
“…whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.”
Winston was right.
He was right then, and he is STILL right today.
We are at the point where no quarter can be given.
“Peace in our time”?
“…recent news suggests Goss is serious about clearing out risk averse bureaucrats who were acting more like sedate bankers than dashing case officers”? (Would that such a movement were taking place in the Democratic Party instead of the CIA…)
If the CIA’s “dashing case officers” are dashing around the world opposing the awakening of heretofore oppressed people just so that we can drive SUVs and get fat on bad food…give me the risk averse bureaucrats ANY time.
Goss works for BushCo.
BushCo is wrong wrong W-R-O-N-G!!!
Thus…Goss is wrong.
Undoubtedly Tenet was ALSO wrong. Two wrongs do not make a right, but they DO often make a right wing.
The CIA itself appears to largely have gone “wrong” (Or is that “right”?) way back in the ’60s or even earlier.
Understand this.
Secrecy is power.
Absolute secrecy is absolute power.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
And here we jolly well are…
Once the absolutely secret and therefore inevitably corrupt CIA succeeded in corrupting its overseers…including the media…well, then, it was already game, set and match.
Do we “need” a secret service of this sort?
Yes.
The world is what it is and what it always has been. A ball of vicious competition and strife.
Has this particular spy system gotten a little…out of hand?
Whadda you…kiddin’ me, or what?
Goss?
He works for BushCo.
BushCo?
IT works for corporate interests the short-term, quarterly profit goals of which best are served by controlling the government.
Fascism?
“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” Benito Mussolini.
Need I say more?
I think not.
Resistance is NOT futile.
It is necessary to our very survival.
Or…Machine World 2010 is just around the corner.
Your choice.
Goss?
Please…
AG