firedoglake on Rove’s intimidation of the Judiciary Committee:
So, let’s see: the Republican Party stands for (a) the Constitution, the nation and its principles or (b) whatever Karl Rove tells them to stand for, because they are big wimpy babies who aren’t allowed to think for themselves and who pee in their pants every time Karl says jump? You choose.
The Attorney General’s lack of candor adds to the already mounting credibility problem that this Administration faces. One of the things I tried to do in my second round of questions yesterday was to point out how incomplete and misleading the President’s comments on the NSA program in the State of the Union address were.
This administration reacts to anyone who questions this illegal program by saying that those of us who demand the truth and stand up for our rights and freedoms somehow has a pre-9/11 world view. In fact, the President has a pre-1776 world view. Our government has three branches, not one. And no one, not even the President, is above the law.
Yup, you got that one right! I htink I read from FDL or one of her links that karl threatned the repubs with knee damage if they did what would bring on the impeachment proceedings. Could we expect anything less of him…:o( What a bunch of cowards…..
Also, the more I hear from Russ, the more I like what I hear. Unless something is out there that I know nothing about, I am leaning his direction more so every day.
Russ went off on the Senate floor, including reading that quote above as part of his speech.
I want video. God damn that looks like it must have been a great speech.
Text here @ RawStory.
so is FDL running for Prez then?
The question I would like to hear…
Q. At what point is the President’s “inherent power” limited?
And the only point I notice is how upset Gonzo gets when people protest him in public..he is a fascist. But he only seems upset when it is people who are not his equals or dare I say “beneath him” protest. Well I guess that is part of the W/H’s arrogance.
Yes! That is the key question no one asks and no one answers.
I’m quite poor these days, but I’d giver $5 to any major reporter or opinion monger who publicy aksed any of the highprofile Bush regime spokespersons these questions.
“Can presidential authority be restrained by any law passed by congress?
If the president reserves the right to act on his own authority and not be answerable to the laws of the land, how then can we still consider our government a democracy instead of regarding it as a dictatorship?
I can’t think of a single news person likely to get access to a major regime player who would ask these questions, let alone press the question through follow ups.
I think it is highly unlikely that the SCOTUS gets involved in this any time soon (read: pre-2006 election), but were a lawsuit to get there tomorrow regarding the NSA wiretapping scandal, I would guess that Bush would lose 6-3 with the dissenters being Alito, Thomas, and Scalia. That assumes Roberts and Kennedy vote against Bush along with the four more reliable justices. If this happened, I bet the right would start calling Roberts the second coming of Souter.
I saw that clip of Feingold today on DemocracyNow! and he was magnificent. I wish that show was on about 8 hours a day. I have nothing to watch now that CNN does nothing but cheerlead for Dear Leader.